IHP 340 Module Six Worksheet(1)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
340
Subject
Statistics
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by ProfIronWolf38
Module Six Worksheet
Identification of Methods and Interpretation of Results
Prompt
:
Review Table 1 below and then complete the Module Six Worksheet steps.
Note: the chi-square (c
2
) test is covered in Module Seven.
Table 1: Characteristics of Women According to Intake of Alcohol
Variable
Nondrinker*
Drinker*
Test Statistic**
P
value
Mean age of mother at birth (years)
28.2 +
4.4
30.1 +
4.4
19.16
<.0001
% of mothers with education > 12 years 71.1%
77.6%
226.9
<.0001
% of mothers who smoked during pregnancy
7.5%
12.0%
100.7
<.0001
Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m
2
)
23.8 +
4.6
23.7 +
4.3
0.8
0.469
Note: intake of alcohol was during pregnancy except for prepregnancy BMI comparison where drinking status was also prepregnancy.
*Continuous variables presented by mean +
standard deviation, categorical variables as %
** Test statistic is either a
2 value or a t-value
Reference:
Dale, M. T. G., Bakketeig, L. S., and Magnus, P. (2016). Alcohol consumption among first-time mothers and the risk preterm birth: A cohort study. Annals of Epidemiology 26, 275–282
Steps
:
For this assignment, complete the following steps:
1.
Complete this worksheet by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information. Use Table 1 as your source of information. Use the provided completed cells in the matrix to help you fill in the rest of the cells. 1
Variable 1
Variable 2
Name of Variable 1 (Provide Units or Categories)
Quantitative (continuous) or Categorical?
Name of Variable 2 (Provide Units or Categories)
Quantitative (continuous) or Categorical?
Appropriate Statistical Test to use
Corresponding Research Question
P value
Pre-Pregnancy BMI
Quantitative (continuous)
Drinker type (nondrinker or drinker)
Categorical
Two-sample independent t-test
Is there a significant difference in pre-pregnancy BMI between mothers who do and do not drink?
<0.469
Percentage of mothers with an education greater than 12 years
Categorical
Drinker type (nondrinker or drinker)
Categorical
Chi-square test
Did the amount of education received vary by mothers who drank and those who did not?
<.0001
Pre-pregnant intake of alcohol (drinker vs nondrinker)
Categorical
Smoked during pregnancy (y/n)
categorical
Chi-square test
Is there a significant incidence of smoking during
pregnancy between mothers who do or do not drink?
<.0001
Pre-pregnant intake of alcohol (drinker vs nondrinker)
Categorical
Age of mother when child is born (years)
quantitative (continuous)
Two-sample independent t-test
Is there a significant difference in the mean age of mothers at birth who drink
and do not drink?
<.0001
2.
Write out a complete answer to each of the four research questions stated in the matrix. Be sure to state what is being compared and what group or groups did better and by how much. Also, state if the difference was statistically significant or not.
RQ1.
This question compares the relationship between the pre-pregnancy BMI of mothers (quantitative)
who do or do not drink (categorical). The average BMI of mothers who did drink was 23.7 ± 4.3 compared to the BMI of mothers who did not drink was 23.8 ±4.6. Based on the p-value of this comparison, we cannot reject the null hypothesis because Ho: p = 0.05, and p = 0.469. Since p = 0.469 > 2
0.05, we cannot conclude statistical evidence of a relationship between pregnancy BMI and alcohol consumption. RQ2. This question compares a relationship between the percentage of mothers with an education level > 12 years (categorical) and whether they consume alcohol (categorical). The chi square test concluded that 77.6% of mothers with an education level > 12 years consume alcohol whereas 71.1% of mothers with an education level > 12 years do not consume alcohol. Ho: p = 0.05 and the p-value was <.0001, therefore the null hypothesis can be rejected. Since .0001 < 0.05, it can be concluded that there is statistical significance of a difference between mothers with an education level > 12 years who consume
alcohol and mothers who do not.
RQ3. This question compares the relationship between the percentage of mothers who smoked during pregnancy (categorical) and their consumption of alcohol (categorical). The chi square test concluded that 12% of mothers who smoked during pregnancy consumed alcohol whereas 7.5% of mothers who smoked during pregnancy did not consume alcohol. Ho: p = 0.05 and the p-value for this test is <.0001, therefore we can reject the null hypothesis as p<.0001 < 0.05 and conclude that there is statistical evidence indicating a higher percentage of smoking during a pregnancy and alcohol consumption.
RQ4.
This question compares the mother's age at birth (quantitative) with the pre-pregnant intake of alcohol (categorical). The t-test concluded that the average age of a mother who consumes alcohol was 30.1 ± 4.4, while the average age of a mother who does not consume alcohol was 28.2 ± 4.4. Based on the p-value of p<.0001, we can reject the null hypothesis since Ho: p = 0.05. Since p<0.0001 < 0.05, we can conclude that there is statistical evidence that the average age of a mother at birth was higher if she
consumes alcohol. 3.
Were the values of BMI more varied among the women who drank or did not drink prior to getting pregnant? Explain how you know this.
There is no statistical evidence indicating a relationship between the BMI of pre-pregnant mothers and their consumption of alcohol. Ho: p = 0.05. The result of this t-test was p<0.469. 0.469 > 0.05, therefore no statistical evidence can be concluded since the p-value is greater than alpha. However, we can confirm that there is a greater variation among mothers who did not drink because the standard deviation was ±4.6 compared to the ±4.3 standard deviation of mothers who did. 4.
Upload and submit your completed worksheet assignment.
3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Documents
Related Questions
Please use the classical approach, not p value approach
arrow_forward
The Data
The dataset "energy" is a random sample of 56 cases from “Existing Buildings Energy Performance Ordinance Report” from the City of San Francisco Open Data Portal. There are 2,629 cases in the dataset.
Citation: SFEBO Help Desk.(Last updated 11/13/2020). Existing Buildings Energy Performance Ordinance Report [data file]. Provided by SF Environment. (Retrieved 11/29/2020). https://data.sfgov.org/Energy-and-Environment/Existing-Buildings-Energy-Performance-Ordinance-Re/j2j3-acqj
There are 57 cases. Each case is a building in San Francisco that must be benchmarked using Energy Star Portfolio Manager annually.
There are 6 variables:
parcel - the parcel number
building - the building name
postal_code - the postal code
year_built - the year the building was built
energy_score19 - the ENERGY STAR score for 2019; 1 - 100, where 50 is the national median score, and 100 is best energy performance.
energy_score18 - the ENERGY STAR score for 2018
energy.csv download…
arrow_forward
The number of awards earned by students at one high school is recorded. Predictors of the number of awards earned include the type of program in which the student was enrolled (e.g., vocational, general or academic) and the score on their final exam in math. Below is a description of the variables and their levels of measurement
Variables
Student ID - NOMINAL
Math Scores - RATIO
Total # of awards - DISCRETE
Program Type - NOMINAL (categorical with three levels: (1)general, (2)academic, (3)vocational)
Total Students= 200
Total Awards = 194
Total math scores = 10529
Program Type sum = 405
Summarize in words the frequency distribution for the program type variable.
arrow_forward
Please help me figure this out. Thank you :)
arrow_forward
Do the data indicate a significant change in grade distribution? Test at the .05 level of significance. Use Chi-square
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...
Algebra
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:McGraw Hill
Related Questions
- Please use the classical approach, not p value approacharrow_forwardThe Data The dataset "energy" is a random sample of 56 cases from “Existing Buildings Energy Performance Ordinance Report” from the City of San Francisco Open Data Portal. There are 2,629 cases in the dataset. Citation: SFEBO Help Desk.(Last updated 11/13/2020). Existing Buildings Energy Performance Ordinance Report [data file]. Provided by SF Environment. (Retrieved 11/29/2020). https://data.sfgov.org/Energy-and-Environment/Existing-Buildings-Energy-Performance-Ordinance-Re/j2j3-acqj There are 57 cases. Each case is a building in San Francisco that must be benchmarked using Energy Star Portfolio Manager annually. There are 6 variables: parcel - the parcel number building - the building name postal_code - the postal code year_built - the year the building was built energy_score19 - the ENERGY STAR score for 2019; 1 - 100, where 50 is the national median score, and 100 is best energy performance. energy_score18 - the ENERGY STAR score for 2018 energy.csv download…arrow_forwardThe number of awards earned by students at one high school is recorded. Predictors of the number of awards earned include the type of program in which the student was enrolled (e.g., vocational, general or academic) and the score on their final exam in math. Below is a description of the variables and their levels of measurement Variables Student ID - NOMINAL Math Scores - RATIO Total # of awards - DISCRETE Program Type - NOMINAL (categorical with three levels: (1)general, (2)academic, (3)vocational) Total Students= 200 Total Awards = 194 Total math scores = 10529 Program Type sum = 405 Summarize in words the frequency distribution for the program type variable.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...
Algebra
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:McGraw Hill