ABA 626 Week 3

docx

School

National University College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

626

Subject

Statistics

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by PrivateSummer15605

Report
Figure 1.1 Student ABA 626 Acquisition Standard Celeration Chart Chart 1.1 Student ABA 626 Acquisition Raw Data
Figure 2.1 Student ABA 626 Acquisition Application Deck 1 Report Chart 2.2 Student ABA 626 Acquisition Application Deck 1 Report Timeline
Chart 3.1 ABA 626 Application Fluency Deck 1Report Chart 3.2 ABA 626 Fluency Application Deck 1 Report Timeline Data Analysis Figure 1.1 displays the data collected for the week of February 19 th , 2024 to February 25 th , 2024 for deck 2 of ABA 626. Acquisition accel data over the week is present with an upward trend and high varability. The upward trend and medium level are hypothesized to be due to running the deck daily becoming more understanding of the terms. The last accel data point of the week was at 7 indicating that AIM has not been met. Acquisition decel data is present with a low level
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
and high variability. The decel level and variability is hypothesized to be due to not completing a study mode of the deck and only completing time trials. Figure 3.1 displays the data collected for week of February 19 th , 2024 to February 25 th , 2024 for fluency deck 2. Acquisition accel data over the week is present with a medium level of 10 and low variability indicating that fluency is not being maintained. The level and variability are hypothesized to be due to the fluency deck having so many cards in combination of past decks allowing for randomization of the deck and possibility of getting the cards I struggled with more often than the ones I am fully fluent in. Additionally, the variability is due to becoming fluent in clicking incorrect or correct efficiently rather than my hand working faster than my mind. Study Approach and Adjustments Antecedent The first step of the week was to set my aim at 14 accel. Then determined my reinforcer for the week if this goal was met by Friday. Current reinforcement procedures include being reinforced by increasing my Accel data points daily and completing my SAFMEDS by the end of the day. If I meet my weekly accel goal by Friday, I can be reinforced by a weekend free of studying SAFMEDS and treating myself to one item I desire from a store/re. Other antecedent procedures include studying the deck by completing at least one study mode session and then one study mode session with only missed cards before running timed trials. Additional procedures include studying 5 days per week for no less than 15 minutes by reading through the deck, saying the cards out loud, and writing down the terms and definition I continuously miss. Additionally, I will highlight key words to pull out from the example or definition and use quizlet to further test my knowledge and build my long- and short-term memory. Behavior: Since starting a new deck, on day 1 of running trials I ran one 30-second timing, on days two through five I ran five 30-second timings. For my fluency deck, I run three 30-second timings and review the fluency deck report graph to analyze whether I am on trend to maintaining my AIM or if I need to make any adjustments. This is done a minimum of 5 days. This week I did complete all five days of SAFMEDS. Consequence: Following my last timing of the week, I enter the data into Precision X at the end of the week. I am looking at the data across the week and the deck to evaluate if the AIM is anticipated to be met and/or if there is variability in the data through the graphs presented in my decks. This week's acquisition accel data has a medium level with a upward trend. For decel cards, an additional study time for 10 to 15 minutes was performed. Adjustments: No adjustments are to be made for the upcoming week.