Fmily Violence Assignment.edited

docx

School

University of Notre Dame *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

402

Subject

Sociology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by nkimanzi89

Report
1 Exploring Family Violence Among Underserved Same-Sex Intimate Partners in Our Community Recognizing the frequency and effects of familial violence in romantic relationships between same-sex partners has been more common lately. While discussions around domestic violence often focus on heterosexual relationships, it is crucial to shed light on the unique experiences faced by same- sex couples. As an expert on family violence in our community, I am honored to provide insight into the types of family violence that occur among underserved same-sex intimate partners, the risk factors they face, and the considerations for systemic treatment. Abuse in same-sex intimate partner relationships can take many different forms, such as financial, emotional, sexual, or physical abuse. Physical abuse may involve acts such as hitting, slapping, or pushing. Sexual abuse can encompass non-consensual sexual acts or coercive behaviors. Emotional abuse may include verbal insults, threats, isolation, or manipulation. Financial abuse involves controlling or restricting access to financial resources. It is important to note that family violence does not discriminate based on sexual orientation or gender identity. However, same-sex intimate partners may face additional challenges due to societal stigma and discrimination. It can exacerbate the power dynamics within their relationships and make it more difficult for them to seek help. Same-sex intimate partner violence is a significant concern for the LGBTQ+ community, and it is essential to understand the risk factors that contribute to its occurrence. One of the primary risk factors for same-sex IPV is a power imbalance in the relationship. It can manifest in various ways, such as differences in socioeconomic status, education, age, or social status. An environment of coercive control, which can turn into physical, psychological, or sexual abuse, can arise when one spouse has greater authority or influence over the other. Internalized homophobia and internalized transphobia can also contribute to the risk of same- sex IPV. When individuals internalize negative messages about their sexual orientation or gender identity, it can lead to self-hatred, low self-esteem, and a sense of shame. These feelings can make it more challenging for individuals to recognize and assert their boundaries, leading to a higher risk of IPV. Social support is crucial in any relationship, and it is especially important for individuals in same-sex relationships. However, the LGBTQ+ community often faces discrimination and marginalization, which can lead to a lack of social support. When individuals do not have a support system, they may feel isolated and vulnerable, increasing their risk of IPV. Jealousy and possessiveness are common issues in any relationship, but they can be particularly problematic in same-sex relationships. This can be due to societal expectations and norms that perpetuate the idea that same-sex relationships are less valid or desirable. When individuals feel insecure about their relationship, they may become controlling or possessive, leading to IPV. Substance abuse can contribute to IPV in any relationship, and it is no different for same-sex relationships. Alcohol and drug abuse can impair judgment, increase aggression, and exacerbate existing issues in a relationship. When individuals are under the influence, they may be more likely to engage in harmful behaviors, such as physical or emotional abuse. Financial dependence can also be a risk factor for same-sex IPV. When one partner is financially dependent on the other, it can create a power imbalance and increase the risk of coercive control. It can
2 be particularly challenging for same-sex couples, as they may face discrimination and marginalization in the workplace or when seeking financial assistance. A history of trauma can increase the risk of IPV in any relationship, and it is no different for same-sex relationships. When individuals have experienced trauma in the past, they may be more susceptible to IPV. It can be due to the lingering effects of trauma, such as anxiety, depression, or PTSD, which can impact their ability to recognize and assert their boundaries. Individuals may not understand the signs of IPV or do not know where to seek help; they may be more likely to remain in an abusive relationship. Education and awareness are essential to addressing same- sex IPV and providing support to those who are affected. Addressing family violence among underserved same-sex intimate partners requires a comprehensive and inclusive approach. Systemic treatment should consider the unique challenges faced by this population and provide tailored support. Service providers need to be knowledgeable about LGBTQ+ issues and create an inclusive environment that respects diverse sexual orientations and gender identities. Thiincludes training staff on the specific dynamics of family violence within same-sex relationships. Developing support networks specifically designed for same-sex intimate partners can help create safe spaces where survivors can seek assistance without fear of judgment or discrimination. These networks should include LGBTQ+-affirming counselors, therapists, and community organizations. Advocacy efforts should focus on improving legal protections for same-sex intimate partners, ensuring they have equal access to resources such as restraining orders, shelters, and legal aid services. Collaborating with LGBTQ+ organizations and policymakers is crucial in effecting systemic change. Conclusion: Family violence within same-sex intimate partner relationships is a pressing issue that requires attention and action from our community. Through comprehension of the various forms of violence encountered by marginalized same-sex couples, identification of the risk factors they encounter, and application of systemic treatment approaches tailored to their specific requirements, we can strive towards establishing a more secure and welcoming community that welcomes everyone, irrespective of their gender identity or sexual orientation.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help