22

docx

School

University of Nairobi *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

390

Subject

Sociology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by chestamike0

Report
Topic 5 Discussion According to Jacques and Wright (2008), what do these authors state that without a theoretical framework the active criminal interview data is not scientific? Do you agree or disagree? According to authors such as Jacques and Wright (2008), active criminal interview data lacks scientific rigor in the absence of a theoretical framework. A theoretical framework provides a systematic foundation for understanding events, guiding researchers in developing hypotheses, gathering relevant data, and evaluating outcomes. Without this framework, interviews may lack organization, resulting in inconsistent data gathering and processing. A theoretical framework is essential for establishing the validity and reliability of findings in criminal interviews. It aids in the identification of key variables, clarifies linkages between them, and directs the development of research questions. Without such supervision, data collecting may lack focus and fail to address critical elements driving criminal behavior. I agree with Jacques and Wright. A theoretical framework serves as the scaffolding for scientific investigation, which necessitates an organized method to inquiry. It guarantees that research is more than anecdotal or ad hoc, adding to a field's accumulated knowledge. A theoretical framework improves the study's credibility, replicability, and potential for practical applications in law enforcement and criminal justice. Without it, research may lack the depth and coherence required for scientific progress. While conducting a field interview, recording data that include field notes, transcripts, memos, and written records of the research process, is a challenging job for any data collectors. How do you make sure that you have the best quality data from the field interviewing tasks? Collecting high-quality data during field interviews is a difficult but necessary undertaking for researchers. Meticulous preparation and rigorous approaches are required to obtain the best possible data. First and foremost, comprehensive interviewer training programs are required. These programs should address research objectives, interview techniques, and ethical issues, emphasizing the necessity of data gathering standardization. Prior to the main data collection phase, pilot testing enables for the discovery and correction of any difficulties with the interview protocol, improving the dependability of following data. It is critical to communicate expectations and directions to interviewees clearly. Throughout the fieldwork phase, trained researchers supervise and monitor to ensure data quality. Creating a feedback mechanism encourages constant contact and tackles any issues as they arise. Using technology to record audio or video and take digital notes improves accuracy and organization. The richness of the interview setting is captured through extensive field notes, transcripts, and memoranda. By including reflexivity practices, interviewers are encouraged to reflect on their biases, increasing transparency and awareness. Finally, ethical factors such as gaining informed consent and maintaining participant confidentially are critical to the research's credibility. Researchers can traverse the challenges of field interviewing by combining these methodologies, yielding the greatest quality data for relevant analysis and interpretation. Reference
Jacques, S., & Wright, R. (2008). Intimacy with outlaws: The role of relational distance in recruiting, paying, and interviewing underworld research participants. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(1), 22-38.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help