Quiz Basics of US Government govt 422

docx

School

Liberty University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

422

Subject

Political Science

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

20

Uploaded by JudgeMule2360

Report
Quiz: Basics of US Government Due Nov 13 at 11:59pm Points 125 Questions 42 Time Limit 120 Minutes Instructions The quiz: Covers the Learn material from Module 1: Week 1 Module 3: Week 3 . Contains 42 multiple-choice and essay questions. Is limited to 120 minutes. Allows 1 attempt. Is worth 125 points . Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module 3: Week 3. Attempt History Attempt Time Score LATEST Attempt 1 64 minutes 95 out of 125 * * Some questions not yet graded Correct answers are hidden. Score for this quiz: 95 out of 125 *
Submitted Nov 13 at 9:11pm This attempt took 64 minutes. Question 1 2.5 / 2.5 pts Article III of the Constitution leaves the organization of the lower federal courts to the _____. Congress Supreme Court Cabinet state legislatures Question 2 2.5 / 2.5 pts In American constitutional law, _____ denotes the power of a court of law to review a policy of government (usually a legislative act) and to invalidate that policy if it is found to be contrary to constitutional principles. judicial review judicial restraint judicial activism judicial notice Question 3 2.5 / 2.5 pts
Until 1937 the Supreme Court often frustrated attempts by Congress to exercise police powers. The Court achieved this result by narrowly interpreting the Commerce Clause. following the doctrine of dual federalism. distinguishing between manufacturing and distribution of products. All of the above are true. Question 4 2.5 / 2.5 pts There have been 9 justices on the Supreme Court since _____. 1789 1869 1937 1985 Question 5 2.5 / 2.5 pts The _____, which outlawed slavery, nullified the Supreme Court’s decision in Dred Scott. Twelfth Amendment
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Thirteenth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Fifteenth Amendment Question 6 2.5 / 2.5 pts In _____, the Supreme Court upheld a provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that provided no person completing the sixth grade in an accredited non-English-language Puerto Rican school can be denied the right to vote through inability to read or write English. Katzenbach v. Morgan (1966) South Carolina v. Katzenbach (1966) Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections (1959) Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Company (1968) Question 7 2.5 / 2.5 pts The _____ grants defendants the right to confront (examine or cross-examine) witnesses for the prosecution and the right to have “compulsory process” (the power of subpoena). Fourth Amendment Fifth Amendment
Sixth Amendment Eighth Amendment Question 8 2.5 / 2.5 pts The _____ states that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Seventh Amendment Eighth Amendment Ninth Amendment Tenth Amendment Question 9 2.5 / 2.5 pts The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, enacted as a response to Employment Division v. Smith (1990), was _____ by the Supreme Court in City of Boerne v. Flores (1997). upheld struck down not granted certiorari None of the above is true.
Question 10 2.5 / 2.5 pts The _____ states: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” Seventh Amendment Eighth Amendment Ninth Amendment Tenth Amendment Question 11 2.5 / 2.5 pts The_____ Plan called for a bicameral legislature of the national government where seats were apportioned among the states based on population. New York New Jersey Virginia Georgia Question 12 2.5 / 2.5 pts
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The Supreme Court in Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918), invalidated by a _____ margin federal restrictions on child labor. 5 to 4 6 to 3 7 to 2 8 to 1 Question 13 2.5 / 2.5 pts Article _____ of the Constitution recognizes the judiciary as a separate branch of government. I II III IV Question 14 2.5 / 2.5 pts Justice _____ articulated the Ashwander rules, which seek to protect judicial power not only by deflecting constitutional questions but by making narrow rulings when constitutional issues are considered. Louis Brandeis
Hugo Black Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. None of the above is true. Question 15 2.5 / 2.5 pts The _____ protects people against arbitrary use of eminent domain, the power of government to take private property for public use. Second Amendment Third Amendment Fourth Amendment Fifth Amendment Question 16 2.5 / 2.5 pts The Supreme Court grants approximately _____ petitions for certiorari out of the 10,000 that are filed each term. 100 200
300 400 Question 17 2.5 / 2.5 pts Chief Justice John Marshall contributed significantly to the expansion of constitutional power at the national level. narrowing of constitutional power at the national level. expansion of constitutional power exercised by the states. application of the Bill of Rights to the states. Question 18 2.5 / 2.5 pts The Court’s ruling in McCardle reminds us of Congress’ power over Supreme Court _____. appointments impeachments jurisdiction salary
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Question 19 2.5 / 2.5 pts Under the Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court has continued to move, with notable exceptions, in a _____ direction. liberal conservative neutral None of the above is true. Question 20 2.5 / 2.5 pts In U.S. v. Darby (1941) the Supreme Court upheld the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Full Faith and Credit Act of 1940. the Internal Security Act of 1940. the Social Security Act of 1935. Incorrect Question 21 0 / 2.5 pts The power of the Supreme Court to invalidate unconstitutional acts of Congress was first implied in Hylton v. United States (1796).
Marbury v. Madison (1803). Eakin v. Raub (1825). Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Question 22 2.5 / 2.5 pts In Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), the Supreme Court invalidated the _____ of 1820. Judiciary Act Alien and Sedition Acts Missouri Compromise Neutrality Act Question 23 2.5 / 2.5 pts In Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918), the Supreme Court invalidated a federal statute imposing restrictions on the use of _____. marijuana oleomargarine
child labor railroad tracks Question 24 2.5 / 2.5 pts The _____ overruled the Supreme Court’s decision in Pollock v. Farmer’s Loan and Trust Company (1895) where the Court invalidated a federal law that imposed a tax on incomes over $4,000 per year. Fourteenth Amendment Fifteenth Amendment Sixteenth Amendment Seventeenth Amendment Question 25 2.5 / 2.5 pts It is the _____ that ultimately controls making any changes to the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction. president Supreme Court Congress states
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Question 26 2.5 / 2.5 pts Under Article I of the Constitution, members of the House of Representatives must be at least _____ years of age; members of the Senate must be at least _____ years old. 25; 30 30; 35 35; 40 40; 45 Question 27 2.5 / 2.5 pts Article III of the Constitution provides that the Supreme Court “...shall have _____ jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the _____ shall make.” original; Congress appellate; Congress original; Court appellate; Court Question 28 2.5 / 2.5 pts
The “stream of commerce” doctrine was first articulated by Justice _____ in Swift and Company v. United States (1905). Louis Brandeis Oliver Wendell Holmes William Rehnquist Sandra Day O’Connor Question 29 2.5 / 2.5 pts When all of the judges on an appellate court participate in the oral argument of a case it is said that they are sitting _____. en banc habeas corpus all together certiorari Question 30 2.5 / 2.5 pts The _____ prohibits military authorities from quartering troops in citizens’ homes without their consent. First Amendment
Third Amendment Fifth Amendment Seventh Amendment Question 31 2.5 / 2.5 pts By comparison with the Court of the mid-1930s, the Supreme Court of today is less likely to invalidate a federal tax designed chiefly as a regulatory measure. more likely to invalidate a federal tax designed chiefly as a regulatory measure. less likely to recognize broad national legislative power. more likely to strike down state economic regulations. Question 32 2.5 / 2.5 pts Crimes committed by persons in the military services are normally tried before federal district courts. state criminal courts.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
the Court of Military Justice. courts-martial. Question 33 2.5 / 2.5 pts Judges on all Article III courts are appointed for _____ by the president with Senatorial consent. two years five years ten years life Question 34 2.5 / 2.5 pts The Supreme Court first recognized the power of Congress to conduct investigations in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). Gibbons v. Ogden (1924). Fletcher v. Peck (1810). Kilbourn v. Thompson (1881).
Question 35 2.5 / 2.5 pts To be removed from office on impeachment, a federal judge must be convicted by a _____ vote of the U.S. Senate. simple majority two-thirds three-fourths unanimous Question 36 2.5 / 2.5 pts Routine cases in the U.S. Courts of Appeals are decided by panels of _____ judges. three five seven nine Question 37 2.5 / 2.5 pts The _____ is an Article III court, in that Congress has created this tribunal by exerting its authority under Article III of the United States Constitution.
Court of International Trade Court of Federal Claims Tax Court Court of Appeals for Veterans’ Claims Incorrect Question 38 0 / 2.5 pts The theory of _____ powers originated with Alexander Hamilton, an advocate of strong centralized government. enumerated reserved implied concurrent Question 39 2.5 / 2.5 pts Which of the following is an example of an implied power of Congress? The regulation of interstate commerce The appropriation of funds
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The conducting of investigations Declaring war Question 40 2.5 / 2.5 pts Article _____ of the Constitution specifies the qualifications for members of the House of Representatives and the Senate. I II III IV Question 41 Not yet graded / 12.5 pts Explain the origin of judicial review and evaluate the various justifications that have been proposed for it. Your Answer: Judicial review does not come from English common law. The courts in England did not have the power to override Parliament. Hamilton argued for this power in the federalist, however it is not included in the Constitution. In the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803), Chief Justice John Marshall, attempted to fix an issue that he had caused while working for the previous presidential administration, said that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was "null and void" because it gave the court powers that the Constitution did not. (Stephens, Jr., Scheb II, & Glennon, 2015) The next case they used this newfound power in was the Dred Scott (1857), which ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, and severely damaging the Court's reputation. The Court continued to use judicial review to overturn policies of
the other branches, except when the two branches looked like they would unite against them. The power of judicial review is normally unchallenged today. Hamilton described the justification for judicial review best in Federalist No. 78, "No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid." Hamilton argues that the Constitution is the supreme law of the country, and therefore any law that goes against it should not exist, and if the people want it to, then that is what constitutional amendments are for. Stephens, Jr., O. H., Scheb II, J. M., & Glennon, C. (2015). American Constitutional Law, Volume I: Sources of Power and Restraint (Sixth Edition ed.). Stamford, CT, USA: Cengage Learning. Question 42 Not yet graded / 12.5 pts Citing particular Supreme Court decisions, both historic and modern, explain the difference between judicial activism and judicial restraint. Your Answer: Judicial activism and judicial restraint are opposite of one another. Judicial activism is the exercise of the power of judicial review to overturn government actions. It is the refusal of the courts to knock down such acts, leaving the subject to ordinary politics, is known as judicial restraint. Judicial activism is a concept of judicial decision-making in which a judge advocates for modern ideals and conditions while allowing personal views on public affairs. Judicial activism is a method that allows judges to exercise judicial review and make decisions at the federal level, including decisions on constitutional issues. It also empowers legal institutions to overturn legislative or federal executive actions. A court case that is a good example of Judicial activism is Brown v. Board of Education. Britannica, Judicial activism | Definition, Types, Examples, & Facts | Britannica, Researched on November 11, 2023. Judicial restraints are meant to prevent courts from interfering excessively with democratic politics. Judicial restraint encourages judges to refrain from making unconstitutional judgments and limits their authority. Judicial restraint is when the courts don't allow the interpretation of the Constitution by Congress or any other constitutional body in decision-making. Plessy v. Ferguson and Korematsu v. United States would be examples of judicial restraint. Thoughtco, Judicial activism What Is Judicial Activism? Definition and Examples (thoughtco.com) Links to an external site.