Eight Elements of Thought
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Nairobi *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
LI
Subject
Political Science
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
6
Uploaded by ChiefKookabura2067
1
Eight Elements of Thought
Student’s Name
Course
University
Professor’s Name
Date
2
Eight Elements of Thought
The 8 Elements of Thought, developed by Richard Paul and Linda Elder, are a set of
eight criteria designed to foster critical thinking. Critical thinking is the process of actively and
skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating information to reach
an answer or conclusion. The 8 Elements of Thought are as follows: purpose, question at issue,
information, interpretation, assumptions, conceptualization, implications and consequences, and
point of view. These eight elements are designed to help people become more effective and
efficient thinkers. By analyzing each element, people can develop a more robust understanding
of an issue and come to a well-informed
The 9/11 Report is a comprehensive document that provides an in-depth analysis of the
events leading up to the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001. The report, which the National
Commission authored on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, seeks to identify the causes of
the attacks and suggest ways to prevent similar attacks from occurring. In this essay, I will
discuss how the 8 Elements of Thought, as articulated by Richard Paul and Linda Elder, can be
applied to the 9/11 Report to understand better the key issues and arguments presented in the
document.
The primary purpose of the 9/11 Report is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the
events leading up to the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001. In doing so, the report seeks to
identify the causes of the attacks and suggest ways to prevent similar attacks from occurring. The
report also seeks to provide the public with an understanding of the threat of terrorism and to
promote governmental accountability for the attacks. In order to achieve its purpose, the 9/11
Report provides an in-depth analysis of the events leading up to the attacks. The report examines
the Middle East's political, economic, and social conditions that created an environment
3
conducive to terrorism, as well as the failures of the US intelligence system that allowed the
attacks to occur (
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, 2004)
. The
report also analyzes the failures of federal agencies to respond to the attacks promptly and
suggests ways to prevent similar attacks from occurring in the future.
Discussion in the 9/11 Report centers on whether or not the attacks of September 11,
2001, could have been avoided. The report's authors set out to determine what led to the attacks
and how to stop them from happening again. Further, they want to push for authorities to be held
responsible for the attacks. The 9/11 Commission Report attempts to address this question by
investigating the Middle East's political, economic, and social factors and the shortcomings of
the United States intelligence community that contributed to the attacks (
National Commission
on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, 2004)
. The report also examines the federal
government's slow response to the attacks and makes recommendations for how to prevent future
attacks.
One of the most crucial parts of the human mind that the 9/11 Report covers are the
ability to draw inferences. The report is filled with inferences made by the authors based on the
data they gathered. The authors note, for instance, that such a massive and well-executed attack
could not have been carried out without extensive preparation (
National Commission on Terrorist
Attacks Upon the United States, 2004)
. By drawing this conclusion, the authors gain insight into
the scope and complexity of the attacks. They are better equipped to offer guidance for
preventing future attacks of a similar nature.
The 9/11 Commission Report argues that the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001,
could have been avoided if the United States government had responded more effectively to the
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
threat posed by terrorism. The report's authors contend that the attacks could have been
prevented if the United States government had responded more effectively to the threat of
terrorism (
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, 2004)
. To back up
this claim, the 9/11 Report examines in detail the Middle East's political, economic, and social
conditions that fostered an atmosphere favorable to terrorism, as well as the shortcomings of the
US intelligence system that contributed to the attacks. The report further examines the federal
government's delayed response to the attacks and offers recommendations for preventing future
attacks.
The evidence presented in the 9/11 Report includes interviews with key figures,
documents from the US government, and the findings of the National Commission on Terrorist
Attacks in the United States. The authors of the report also make use of the work of other
scholars and professionals in the study of terrorism. The 9/11 Report relies on sworn testimony,
official government documents, and the findings of the National Commission on Terrorist
Attacks Upon the United States to back up its claims (
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks
Upon the United States, 2004)
. The report's authors provide a thorough analysis of the political,
economic, and social conditions in the Middle East that fostered an environment conducive to
terrorism, as well as the failures of the US intelligence system that enabled the attacks
themselves, drawing on the work of other scholars and experts in the field of terrorism studies.
The authors of the 9/11 Report make several assumptions in their analysis of the events
leading up to the attacks of September 11th, 2001. They believe the attacks could have been
avoided if the US government had responded more effectively to the terrorist threat. The report's
authors also make the assumption that the political, economic, and social conditions in the
Middle East fostered an atmosphere favorable to terrorism and that the United States government
5
should have taken action to address this issue (
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon
the United States, 2004)
. The report's authors also assume that the US intelligence system did not
do enough to detect and prevent the attacks, and that the government should have taken action to
improve the system.
Implication refers to the idea that the evidence presented in the report can be used to
draw conclusions beyond the evidence itself. The 9/11 Commission Report discusses some
significant aspects of thought, including the idea of implication. The 9/11 Report makes several
inferences about the attacks, one of which is that the terrorists were successful in part because of
loopholes in our border security system (
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the
United States, 2004)
. This suggests that we need to beef up our security in this area to prevent
future attacks.
In conclusion, the 8 Elements of Thought can be applied to the 9/11 Report to understand
better the key issues and arguments presented in the document. The 9/11 Report's primary
objective is to offer a thorough examination of the circumstances surrounding the terrorist attacks
of September 11, 2001. This report examines the question, "How could the attacks have been
prevented?" from the perspective that the United States government did not respond adequately
to the threat posed by terrorism. The report's authors rely on interviews with key figures, official
US government documents, and the conclusions of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks
Upon the United States to back up their claims, and they make a number of assumptions in their
analysis of the events leading up to the attacks. When the 8 Thinking Habits are applied to the
9/11 Report, we gain a deeper understanding of the document's central claims and supporting
evidence. By analyzing these incidents, we can learn not only what led up to them but also how
to stop them from happening again in the future.
6
References
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (2004). The 9/11 Commission
report: Final report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United
States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help