W1_Project_PHI2301_Rodriguez_L.doc
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
South University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
PHI2301
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by ChiefHeronMaster1015
1
Title
W1_Project_PHI2301_
Rodriguez_L
.doc
PHI2301
Week
1
Project
Student Name
Liliadne Rodriguez
South University
December, 3, 2023
1
A dialectic is a method of thinking that investigates conflicting viewpoints and
draws a conclusion using the Socratic discourse. To reach a conclusion, two or more parties
present and assess reasons and counterarguments through questioning and discussion. The
foundation of debate is the idea that truth can be found by evaluating several points of view and
verifying the integrity of particular assertions. It is frequently employed in philosophical debates
to examine and assess complex concepts methodically.
Socratic dialogue is a type of debate in which questions challenge an
individual's beliefs and assumptions. The Greek philosopher Socrates created this inquiry style
because he thought acquiring knowledge was the most significant goal in life. He sought to
understand the truth by engaging in dialogue with others and questioning their beliefs and
opinions. Socrates believed the best way to arrive at the truth was to ask questions and
thoughtfully consider the answers. He believed that through this method of inquiry, one could
uncover previously unknown knowledge.
The idea of whether or not there is absolute truth is one notion that may be
investigated using the Socratic Method. Since no one response can be "true," this is a
complicated and frequently contested problem. The Socratic approach could be used to examine
the different viewpoints on this issue and assess the merits of each claim. Examining the
arguments for and against the presence of ultimate truth, the consequences of different solutions,
and the moral ramifications of each solution could all be part of this.
2
Socrates thought that knowledge could be acquired and that opinions were not
absolute because they were founded on personal beliefs. Socrates believed knowledge was an
unchanging reality that could only be discovered through intense research and analysis.
Furthermore, he believed that pursuing knowledge was the ultimate goal of life and that this was
the only way to understand the world in which one lived truly. In the Meno, Socrates makes the
case that knowledge may be acquired by research and inquiry and exists regardless of one's point
of view. Socrates argues in The Republic that knowledge can be acquired via education and
experience and applied to make informed decisions regarding the outer world.
In answer to whether humans will ever be able to know the whole truth, it isn't
possible. Although there are very accurate reports and conclusions based on past experiences,
there is always the possibility that our assumptions and opinions need to be corrected. However,
diligent research can help us better understand the world and the concepts that philosophers
study. Although we may never fully understand these issues, we can develop a more
sophisticated understanding.
Philosophers look at challenging topics and occasionally lack more definitive
answers. These topics could include the meaning of life, the nature of reality, and the relationship
between good and evil. Even while we might be able to form logical conclusions from our
personal experiences and viewpoints, the truth is ultimately arbitrary and subject to change. We
must always ensure our findings are correct because our biases and experiences limit our
understanding of the cosmos. It is a noble goal to seek wisdom and information, and we should
3
learn as much as we can about the world around us. But no matter how much we learn, we will
only partially comprehend the kinds of ideas that philosophers look at. There is no definitive
answer to the questions we seek, and the truth is a changing target. There is only one truth, and
we must acknowledge this and continue to base our knowledge-seeking on our individual beliefs,
moral principles, and life experiences. Ultimately, humans are unable to know the truth with
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
certainty. Even while we can learn more about and comprehend the world, the truth is ultimately
arbitrary and relies on our unique experiences and viewpoints.
4
References
Aristotle. (1941).
The basic works of Aristotle
. New York, NY: Random House.
Inamura, K. (2020). J. S. Mill on Liberty, Socratic Dialectic, and the Logic behind Political
Discourse.
Journal of the History of Ideas
,
81
(2), 257–
277. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2020.0016
Plato. (1937).
The republic
. London, UK: Penguin Books.
Stern-Gillet, S. (2010).
The Cambridge Companion to Socratic philosophy
. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.