Extra-credit Heidi
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Texas A&M University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
ETHICS
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by HighnessGiraffeMaster365
1.
Dr. Stone wants to know about Personality, Background history, Sexual misuse, and
Mental illness, which ones would Heidi care about and which ones would she consider
inconsequential?
The moral responsibility philosopher Heidi L. Maibom would most likely
prioritize personality and mental health issues in her research. She strongly emphasizes
the role that emotions, particularly empathy, play in moral decision-making; therefore, it
seems that she would find personality qualities significant. A person's personality can
influence how they handle moral conundrums.
Furthermore, given that Maibom's research frequently explores the influence of
moral agency on affective states, it is probable that she would have concerns regarding
mental health. Situations that impact emotional control and cognitive function may
impact a person's capacity to make ethically sound decisions, consistent with Maibom's
primary concerns.
On the other hand, she might view past trauma and sexual abuse as less directly
related to her particular concentration on moral obligation. Although prior history can
offer context, Maibom focuses more on the present factors that impact moral judgments,
such as feelings and sympathetic reactions. Although it is a grave ethical matter, sexual
misuse may not be immediately related to her intellectual questions.
In conclusion, while prior history and sexual abuse may be seen as less crucial to
Maibom's specific philosophical investigations, personality, and mental illness are likely
to be more critical to her work on emotions and moral responsibility.
2.
Tommy Lynn Cells
(abandoned as a child, and sexually abused as a child)
a.
According to Heidi’s argument(s), can he reflect on his actions? Why or why not?
Heidi L. Maibom argues that people's emotional and empathetic
capacities are closely linked to their capacity to reflect on their actions. Tommy
Lynn Cells would probably be able to think back on his acts if, despite his
problematic past filled with sexual abuse and abandonment, he is capable of
experiencing and understanding emotions, particularly empathy. Maibom
highlights the significance of emotional involvement in moral responsibility,
implying that people with emotional deficiencies could find it challenging to do
so.
b.
Do you think he can reflect on his actions and realize he was/is blameworthy?
Tommy Lynn Cells's level of emotional and empathic development will
determine whether or not he can consider his acts and acknowledge his guilt. In
particular, if he understands how his acts affect other people, he may be able to
engage in self-reflection and come to terms with his blameworthiness if he can
engage with and comprehend the emotional consequences of his actions.
c.
According to Heidi’s argument(s), is he suffering from a different set of values,
and thus, morally/criminally blameworthy; or is he insane and not blameworthy?
Explain
From Heidi L. Maibom's point of view, Tommy Lynn Cells's traumatic
upbringing may have caused him to have different values, which could have
affected his moral judgments and behavior. This does not, however, automatically
relieve him of moral or legal responsibility. Maibom recognizes the intricacy of
moral obligation, considering empathy and feelings. The particulars of Cells'
emotional and moral makeup will determine whether or not he is viewed as
morally culpable.
d.
He was put to death 10 days ago by the State of Texas should he had been?
The moral and ethical conundrum raised by Tommy Lynn Cells' execution
by the State of Texas transcends the particular points made by Heidi L. Maibom.
Maibom's research emphasizes the importance of emotions in determining moral
responsibility. In addition to social values and legal frameworks, the moral
ramifications of state-sanctioned executions are among the broader ethical issues
surrounding the death penalty. It is a complicated topic with many opposing
viewpoints, and people's views on the death sentence frequently change
depending on their convictions regarding justice and the value of human life.
3.
David Parker Ray and Cindy Hendy
a.
According to Heidi’s argument(s), could they reflect on their actions? Why or
why not?
The arguments by Heidi L. Maibom suggest a close connection between
emotional and empathetic abilities and the capacity for self-reflection. David
Parker Ray and Cindy Hendy could consider their acts if, despite the charges
against them, they can interact with and comprehend emotions. Maibom
highlights the role that emotional involvement has in defining moral
responsibility.
b.
Do you think they can reflect on their actions and realize they were blameworthy?
The degree to which David Parker Ray and Cindy Hendy possess
emotional and empathic intelligence will determine whether or not they can
consider the consequences of their acts and admit their guilt. They may be able to
reflect on themselves and recognize their moral responsibility if they can
comprehend the emotional fallout from their behavior.
c.
According to Heidi’s argument(s), are they suffering from a different set of
values, and thus, morally/criminally blameworthy; or are they insane and not
blameworthy? Explain
From Maibom's point of view, those who operate outside of societal
norms might do so because of their own experiences, which have developed their
values. This does not, however, automatically relieve them of moral or criminal
responsibility. Because Maibom places so much focus on emotions, it is possible
for people who hold diverse beliefs to be still morally responsible if they are
capable of comprehending emotions.
4.
Kathy wood and Gwendolyn and Graham
a.
According to Heidi’s argument(s), could they reflect on their actions? Why or
why not?
Maibom's theories suggest that emotional and empathetic capacities are
linked to the ability to reflect on one's actions. Should Kathy Wood, Gwendolyn
Graham, and Graham Young be able to interact with and comprehend emotions,
they could be able to take stock of what they did. Maibom's focus on emotions
implies that people must be emotionally involved to understand the moral
ramifications of their actions.
b.
Do you think they can reflect on their actions and realize they were blameworthy?
To what degree Kathy Wood, Gwendolyn Graham, and Graham Young
can feel regret for what they did and realize that they were at fault will depend on
these qualities. They can reflect on themselves and recognize their moral
responsibility if they can comprehend the emotional fallout from their acts.
c.
According to Heidi’s argument(s), are they suffering from a different set of
values, and thus, morally/criminally blameworthy; or are they insane and not
blameworthy? Explain
From Maibom's point of view, people with various moral standards and
who have been exposed to diverse experiences can nevertheless be ethically and
legally responsible, provided they can interpret emotions. The presence or lack of
emotional engagement and sympathetic responses determines whether a person is
deemed mad or morally culpable. According to Maibom's paradigm, Kathy
Wood, Gwendolyn Graham, and Graham Young could face moral and legal
ramifications if they exhibit emotional empathy in the face of possible moral
transgressions.
5.
Westly Allan Dodd
(irresistible impulse to kill children)
a.
According to Heidi’s argument(s), can he reflect on his actions? Why or why not?
Maibom's theories suggest that emotional and empathetic capacities are
intimately related to the ability to reflect on one's actions. If Westley Allan Dodd
is capable of interacting with and comprehending emotions, even despite his
alleged overpowering drive, then he could be able to think back on what he did.
According to Maibom's paradigm, people require emotional involvement to
understand their actions' moral ramifications.
b.
Do you think he can reflect on his actions and realize he was/is blameworthy?
Depending on how far along he is in his emotional and empathic
development, Westley Allan Dodd may or may not be able to consider his acts
and acknowledge his guilt. It may be possible for him to reflect on his conduct
and recognize his moral responsibility if he can comprehend the emotional fallout
from his activities.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
c.
According to Heidi’s argument(s), is he suffering from a different set of values,
and thus, morally/criminally blameworthy; or is he insane and not blameworthy?
Explain
From Maibom's point of view, people with various moral standards and
who have been exposed to diverse experiences can nevertheless be ethically and
legally responsible, provided they can interpret emotions. An investigation into
Dodd's emotional and sympathetic reactions is necessary to determine whether or
not he is deemed insane or is simply suffering from a different set of values. By
exhibiting emotional intelligence despite his alleged inclination, Dodd might be
held legally and morally responsible, according to Maibom's paradigm.
6.
Nathan bar Jonah
(abused raped and tortured as a kid?)
a.
According to Heidi’s argument(s), can he reflect on his actions? Why or why not?
Maibom's theories suggest that emotional and empathetic capacities are
intimately related to the ability to reflect on one's actions. Nathan bar Jonah
might think back on his deeds if, despite his documented history of abuse, rape,
and torture, he is capable of interacting with and comprehending emotions.
According to Maibom's paradigm, people require emotional involvement to
understand their actions' moral ramifications.
b.
Do you think he can reflect on his actions and realize he was/is blameworthy?
The level of Nathan bar Jonah's emotional and sympathetic abilities will
determine whether or not he can consider his conduct and acknowledge his guilt.
It may be possible for him to reflect on his conduct and recognize his moral
responsibility if he can comprehend the emotional fallout from his activities.
c.
According to Heidi’s argument(s), is he suffering from a different set of values,
and thus, morally/criminally blameworthy; or is he insane and not blameworthy?
Explain
From Maibom's point of view, people with various moral standards and
who have been exposed to diverse experiences can nevertheless be ethically and
legally responsible, provided they can interpret emotions. An analysis of Nathan
bar Jonah's sympathetic and affective reactions is necessary to determine whether
or not he is deemed mad or is simply suffering from a distinct set of values.
According to Maibom's paradigm, Nathan bar Jonah might be considered legally
and morally responsible if he can show emotional comprehension despite his
alleged background.
7.
Leonard Lake
a.
According to Heidi’s argument(s), can he reflect on his actions? Why or why not?
Maibom's theories suggest that emotional and empathetic capacities are
intimately related to the ability to reflect on one's actions. Leonard Lake might
consider his actions if he can interact with and comprehend emotions. According
to Maibom's paradigm, people require emotional involvement to understand their
actions' moral ramifications.
b.
Do you think he can reflect on his actions and realize he was/is blameworthy?
The degree of Leonard Lake's emotional and empathic abilities will
determine whether or not he can consider his acts and acknowledge his guilt. It
may be possible for him to reflect on his conduct and recognize his moral
responsibility if he can comprehend the emotional fallout from his activities.
c.
According to Heidi’s argument(s), is he suffering from a different set of values,
and thus, morally/criminally blameworthy; or is he insane and not blameworthy?
Explain
From Maibom's point of view, people with various moral standards and
who have been exposed to diverse experiences can nevertheless be ethically and
legally responsible, provided they can interpret emotions. Lake's emotive and
sympathetic reactions raise the question of whether he is insane or just suffering
from different ideals. In light of the egregious nature of Lake's crimes, Maibom's
approach suggests that he might face moral and legal consequences if he can
exhibit emotional comprehension.