Short essay in Theo 202 topic Christian faith
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Concordia University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
202
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by AgentMosquitoMaster939
Short essay in Theo 202
Topic : Christian faith in Moral Life
Example 1 :
The act of well-known individuals revising their viewpoints serves as a powerful
motivator and a testament to their courage. Admitting a mistake or wrongdoing is a
daunting task for anyone, stemming from our natural inclination to uphold our beliefs,
protect our egos, and maintain a positive self-image. Yet, as human beings, it's inherent
for us to err and encounter new information that challenges our existing beliefs. Mark
Lynas, a prominent figure, publicly acknowledged a significant error in his perspective
on genetically modified crops.
Such admissions require qualities like integrity, bravery, and strength, especially when
made in front of a large audience. Lynas' reconsideration of his stance on GMOs and
his commitment to honesty serve as a genuine source of inspiration.
Individually, we
are constantly in the process of acquiring and integrating knowledge, continuously
analyzing new information and evidence.
Regular reassessment is crucial for maintaining a healthy mindset and making informed
decisions based on fresh evidence. Given the influential role public figures play in
shaping opinions, they have a moral obligation to transparently communicate any shifts
in their viewpoints. The key lies not in changing one's views but in fostering a receptive
mindset and acknowledging it when such a shift occurs.
Example 2 :
Looking at it from a bigger picture, I think its inspirational that Mark Lynas admitted he
was wrong after looking at the science from an "unbiased" point of view. Being able to
admit you're wrong and to a large group of people who have their own staunch opinions
on the matter at that, takes a lot of courage and is very admirable in that sense.
However, from a more cynical perspective it is possible there is foul play behind the
scenes. Perhaps Lynas was bribed by a major GMO/pharmaceutical company like
Monsanto or Bayer. Or perhaps the information that Lynas garnered was tampered with
by a GMO company.
The topic of genetic modification as well is a very divisive one, it can create more food
for the world population, but it can also set a dangerous precedent in the future. If crops
are genetically modified, why not livestock? Why not pets? Why not humans? And what
implications does that hold if we were to go down that path? Truthfully I believe there is
no right answer until we define what our path as a society should be, and then discuss if
that path is the right one.
Example 3 :
I find Mark Lynas's change of heart regarding GMOs is quite relevant to our
discussions of progress and redemption in Christian ethics.
From my perspective, the ability of a person to change their mind in the face of
evidence is a commendable trait, especially when that person, like Mark Lynas, held a
prominent position against GMOs. It suggests a humility and a willingness to engage
with new information and admit previous misunderstandings.
This aligns well with the Christian ethical framework we have been learning about,
particularly the aspects of progress-developing through questioning and seeking truth-
and redemption, which involves a transformative experience that leads to a new
understanding and, often, new actions.
Such a high-profile change of mind should not be an immediate source of inspiration or
disappointment but rather a call to consider the evidence and reasoning that led to the
change. It is easy to feel betrayed when someone you agreed with changes their
stance, but it is also an opportunity for all involved to re-examine their own beliefs and
the evidence supporting them. It is, in a sense, an invitation to a communal intellectual
pilgrimage.
In making a judgment about this change, I would look to several questions:
1. Has Lynas provided compelling evidence to support his new position? As someone
dedicated to the pursuit of truth, it is crucial to assess the quality and weight of the new
information.
2. Does the change reflect a genuine concern for the common good, or does it appear
to be motivated by personal gain or pressure from external groups?
3. What is the potential impact of his change of stance on public opinion and policy? Is it
likely to lead to greater good or harm?
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help