Rennix Robinson Trolley Problem and Millar Robot Cars Ethics
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Rutgers University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
PHIL 104
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by CountOstrichMaster282
Qudsia Malik
October 7, 2023 Doctor Edel PHIL 334-005
Rennix Robinson Trolley Problem and Millar Robot Cars Ethics “The Trolley Problem Will Tell You Nothing Useful About Morality" by Rennix & Robinson (2017) and “You Should Have A Say In Your Robot Car’s Code of Ethics” by Millar (2014) explore the ethics of autonomous vehicles in the modern world. These articles are about the ethics of autonomous vehicles, which are cars that can drive themselves. The first article, by Rennix and Robinson, says that a famous moral problem called the trolley problem is not useful for deciding how autonomous vehicles should make ethical decisions. The Trolley Problem is: If a self-driven car is about to hit a group of people, should it swerve and hit one person instead? Rennix and Robinson think the trolley problem is too simple and doesn't consider all the complexities of real-life situations. They believe that autonomous vehicles should prioritize human life and follow rules and guidelines set by the government and industry.
The second article, by Millar, says that people should be able to decide the ethics of their own autonomous vehicles. They think that personal values and beliefs should influence how cars
behave. They also worry that the algorithms that control autonomous vehicles might not be transparent, so people should have control over the code and be responsible for it. They suggest a
collaborative decision-making process with public involvement and regulation.
Both articles give information about the moral concerns of autonomous vehicles, but they
have different ideas about how to address these concerns. The first article thinks that regulations
and industry guidelines should be followed, while the second article thinks that individuals should have control over the ethics of their own cars.
Rennix and Robinson are saying that the trolley problem, which is a moral dilemma about a train and people on the tracks, is not a good way to decide how self-driving cars should make ethical decisions. They think the trolley problem is too simple and doesn't show the real complexities of making moral choices. They also think it's not fair because it only looks at numbers and doesn't think about how valuable a person's life is.
Rennix and Robinson focus on meaning, motive, and personal perception of ethical decisions and they believe that autonomous vehicles must be pre-programmed to value a human being's life. However, in his article, Millar argues that people should be able to control the ethics of their own computer based autonomous cars.
He thinks that users should be able to customize the moral code of their car to match their own values and beliefs. Millar also thinks that the algorithms behind autonomous cars should be transparent, so that people can take responsibility for them. He believes that users should be able to set parameters for when their car should prioritize their safety over other road users. When it comes to making decisions for self-driven cars, we should think about what is best for people. People's safety should be the most important thing. We should also follow the laws and rules that are in place for driving. And we should make sure that the cars are made in a way that is acceptable and safe.
It's also important for individuals to have a say in the ethics of self-driven cars. People should be able to decide what they think is right and wrong for their own cars. This way, they can take responsibility for their choices. There are many challenges when it comes to making decisions for self-driven cars. We need to find a balance between making rules for everyone,
letting people customize their cars, and making decisions as a group. Overall, self-driven cars are
a complicated topic with many moral issues to consider. It's important to think about what is best
for people's safety and to involve individuals in making decisions for their own cars.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help