Untitled document (34)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Indian River State College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1045
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
8
Uploaded by neisy2831
Rubric for Written Assignment
Drug Brochure
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Score Clarity of Introduction
Points: 2 (2%)
Introduction - Student does not introduce the topic or tell the reader what to expect.
Points: 3 (3%)
Introduction - Student somewhat introduces the topic or tells the reader what to expect.
Points: 4 (4%)
Introduction - Student introduces the topic and tells the reader what to expect.
Points: 5 (5%)
Introduction - Student thoroughly introduces the topic and tells the reader what to expect.
Application of Theory
Points: 4 (4%)
Accuracy - Student does not accurately apply theory and/or research to the topic.
Points: 8 (8%)
Accuracy - Student applies theory and/or research to the topic. Points: 11 (11%)
Accuracy - Student accurately applies theory and/or research to the topic.
Points: 15 (15%)
Accuracy - Student thoroughly and accurately applies theory and/or research to the topic.
Application of Theory
Points: 2 (2%)
Relevance - Student does not focus discussion directly on topic content.
Points:3 (3%)
Relevance - Student focuses discussion somewhat on topic content.
Points: 4 (4%)
Relevance - Student focuses discussion on topic content. Points: 5 (5%)
Relevance - Student focuses discussion directly on topic content.
Application of Theory
Points: 4 (4%)
Resources – Student does not use peer reviewed and/or scholarly resources.
Points: 6 (6%)
Resources – Student somewhat uses peer reviewed and/or scholarly resources.
Points: 8 (8%)
Resources – Student mostly uses peer reviewed and/or scholarly resources.
Points: 10 (10%)
Resources – Student consistently uses peer reviewed and/or scholarly resources.
Critical and Creative Thinking
Points: 12 (12%)
Critical Thinking - Student does not apply higher-level thinking skills (e.g., evaluates and analyzes) prior to making recommendations.
*Include one item besides the names
Points: 18 (18%)
Critical Thinking - Student applies higher-level thinking skills, somewhat (e.g., evaluates and analyzes) prior to making recommendations.
*Include 2-3 of these items
Points: 24 (24%)
Critical Thinking - Student applies higher-level thinking skills (e.g., evaluates and analyzes) for the most part, prior to making recommendations
.
* Include 4-5 of these items
Points:30(30%)
Critical Thinking - Student applies higher-level thinking skills (e.g., evaluates and analyzes) prior to making recommendations.
Information included *names (brand and generic), *action, *side effects, *dietary restrictions, *contraindications,
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
*usual dose
Critical and Creative Thinking
Points: 4 (4%)
Creative Thinking - Recommendations demonstrate original thinking. Points: 6 (6%)
Creative Thinking - Recommendations demonstrate original thinking. Points: 8 (8%)
Creative Thinking - Recommendations demonstrate original thinking. Points: 10 (10%)
Creative Thinking - Recommendations demonstrate original thinking.
Organization
Visual appeal Points: 2 (2%)
Organization - Organization of paper does not demonstrate critical thinking, nor the use of
transitions, and APA headings
•
Used same font throughout brochure
Points: 3 (3%)
Organization - Organization of paper sometimes demonstrates critical thinking, sometimes uses of transitions, and APA headings
•
No color or graphics Points: 4 (4%)
Organization - Organization of paper demonstrates critical thinking, use of transitions, and
APA headings but with minor errors
•
Use of color or graphics
Points: 5 (5%)
Organization - Organization of paper demonstrates critical thinking, use of transitions, and
APA headings
•
Use of colorful graphics
Quality of Writing
Points: 2 (2%)
In Text Citations and Paraphrasing – In text citations and paraphrasing are not done using
format required for scholarly work
Points: 3 (3%)
In Text Citations and Paraphrasing – In text citations and paraphrasing are done using format required for scholarly work but contains major/numerous errors
Points: 4 (4%)
In Text Citations and Paraphrasing – In text citations and paraphrasing are done using format required for scholarly work but with minor errors (underlined).
Points: 5 (5%)
In Text Citations and Paraphrasing – In text citations and paraphrasing are done using format required for scholarly work
Quality of Writing
Use of appropriate word choices
Points: 2 (2%)
Precision - Student does not use terminology or write clearly and concisely.
*Information presented in unclear manner, minimal number of 3 syllable words
Points: 3 (3%)
Precision - Student does not either use terminology and/or write clearly and concisely.
*Language used is above the normal lay population, 3-4 medical terms used, multiple 3-4 syllable words
Points: 4 (4%)
Precision - Student uses terminology and writes clearly and concisely.
*Language used is above the normal lay population, 3-4 medical terms used, limited number of 3 syllable words
Points: 5 (5%)
Precision - Student consistently uses terminology and writes clearly and concisely.
*Written at language appropriate for minimally educated population (limited number of 3 syllable words), written in easy to follow format
Quality of Writing
Points: 2 (2%)
Mechanics - Student does not spell, construct sentences, and punctuate correctly
Points: 3 (3%)
Mechanics - Student somewhat spells, constructs sentences, and punctuates correctly
Points: 4 (4%)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Mechanics - Student spells, constructs sentences, and punctuates correctly
Points: 5 (5%)
Mechanics - Student consistently spells, constructs sentences, and punctuates correctly
Quality of Writing
Points: 2 (2%)
Reference List is not constructed correctly
No reference included
Points: 3 (3%)
Reference list has numerous errors
1 source
Points: 4 (4%)
Reference list as minor errors
2 sources
Points: 5 (5%)
Reference list is constructed correctly
3 sources
TOTAL SCORE