PS3-Y20 Dariel Gracia
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
South Texas College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
ORGANIZATI
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by raulgortiz1
Dariel Gracia
Exploring Weaknesses in an Argument
Practice exploring weakness in an argument by evaluating an argument. Complete the following steps.
1.
Save this file with a new name
Click the File tab, click Save As, add your name to the end of the filename, then click Save. For example, save this file as
PS3-Y20 Sharon Rodriguez.docx
.
2.
Get ready Read the following arguments, which are all weak. 1.
Quest should market tours to professionals in certain fields. Engineers are very meticulous. They would enjoy Quest tours if they knew more about them.
2.
Assuming that most U.S. travelers want to stay in the United States this summer, Quest should promote popular American tours.
3.
Quest should schedule monthly tours to Norway because it feels like the right thing to do.
4.
Quest tour enrollments were high until Keisha Lane became vice president of operations. Her decisions are clearly causing the decline in tour sales.
3.
Now you try it
In the following space, explain why each argument is weak.
This argument is weak because it relies on a vague assumption about engineers without providing any evidence or reasoning to support the claim. It assumes that engineers would enjoy Quest tours if they knew more about them, but it lacks any justification for why this would be the case. Additionally, it doesn't provide any specific plan or strategy for marketing tours to professionals in certain fields.
This argument is weak because it relies on an assumption without providing any evidence to support it. Assuming that most U.S. Travelers want to stay in the United States this summer is a speculative claim that lacks data or research to back it up. Without supporting evidence, the argument lacks persuasiveness and could be based on flawed assumptions about traveler preferences.
You Try It
This argument is weak because it lacks any logical reasoning or evidence to support the recommendation. Simply stating that scheduling monthly tours to Norway "feels like the right thing to do" is not a sufficient justification for making business decisions. Without providing any rationale or analysis of the potential benefits or drawbacks of scheduling tours to Norway, the argument lacks substance and credibility.
Submit the document to your instructor as requested.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help