Utilitarianism is a system that believes morality
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Liberty University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
101
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by MagistrateHyena2751
Utilitarianism is a system that bases morality on the greatest good for the greatest number of people. According to Rae, utilitarianism stands out because it does not require a special appeal to
any religious authority; instead, it appeals to nonmoral criteria for determining the good.
1
Virtue ethics emphasizes having good qualities with excellent character traits determines morality. Ray argues that virtue theory is an ethic of character and not a duty, and it holds individuals accountable to the moral principles of being Christ-like in nature and not in spirit.
2
Virtue ethics is essential for mankind, and it promotes social unity. Natural law is centered around moral principles that God revealed outside the Bible. To interpret God’s Word outside the Scripture, Rae let us know that you must have natural wisdom and it must appeal to observed evidence for its authority.
3
The good about natural law is point out unjust laws that support racial and gender discrimination, because those types of laws are not acceptable outside of the Scripture. Deontological (duty) ethics is the core of morality based on God’s word and natural law. Tseng and Wang pointed out a good thing about duty ethics and said that duty and obligations are the basis for moral decisions.
3
This statement lets us know Christians has a moral duty follow God’s commandments and the moral principles outside the Bible. Ethical egoism claims a self-interest act is good, and that act is considered moral. It also claims the good thing about its system is it treats people with dignity and respect. Natural law and duty ethics are similar because both are based on religion and moral duty to obey God’s Word inside and outside of the Scripture determine morality. However, they have their differences and related personal interpretation of duty and what is moral to their church teaching. Topics such as politics, homosexuality, and immigration seem to be the major ones. Natural law is the most significant ethical theory, and it is based on unchanging, universal moral principles for man that are not tied to Scripture. God’s Word is available for everyone. Nevertheless, natural law forces Christians to view ethics differently because it addresses issues not directed in Scripture. The Bible and natural law are God’s written and unwritten plans for humanity. Without the Bible, it would be hard for people to comprehend the morality of what is wrong, such as stealing, adultery, and lying. However, natural law addresses unwritten Scriptures
on justice, fairness, human dignity, and other issues essential to morality. This is where wisdom comes into play understanding morality. Rae lets us know that the concept of wisdom opens the door to a more general form of natural law.
4
This statement lets me know that without Scripture, people must have access to God’s moral code. He also argues that for God to hold the world legitimately accountable for sin, they must have access to God’s standard of morality, even if they lack special revelation.
5
Unfortunately, many issues facing our country today are not written in the Bible, and they are not
simple to comprehend on what is right or wrong. One of them is abortion. This subject alone has divided this country, and at time protests turn violent. The primary question about abortion is whether it falls under killing, which is forbidden in the Bible, or does it fall under in natural law
holds standards to dignity and that a woman has a right to make decisions about her body on commandments that are not in the Bible. 1.
Tseng, Po-En, and Ya-Huei Wang. “Deontological or Utilitarian? An Eternal Ethical Dilemma in
Outbreak
.”
International journal of environmental research and public health
vol. 18,16 8565. (p1-13) 13 Aug. 2021, doi:10.3390/ijerph18168565
3.
Tseng, Po-En, and Ya-Huei Wang. “Deontological or Utilitarian? An Eternal Ethical Dilemma in
Outbreak
.”
International journal of environmental research and public health
vol. 18,16 8565. (p1-13) 13 Aug. 2021, doi:10.3390/ijerph18168565
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help