Philosophical Framework Paper
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Maryland, University College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
414
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
9
Uploaded by mina3050
1
Philosophical Framework Paper
UMGC
November 7, 2023
2
Deontological Ethics
Deontological ethics, often attributed to the work of Immanuel Kant, is one of the major ethical frameworks that emphasize the moral rightness of actions based on their intrinsic nature, rather than their consequences. This ethical perspective stands in contrast to teleological ethics, which assesses actions based on their outcomes. Kant's central premise is the concept of the "categorical imperative," a foundational idea that forms the basis of deontological ethics. The categorical imperative asserts that individuals should act according to principles that could be universalized without contradiction. In other words, an action is considered morally right if it could be applied as a universal law without leading to logical inconsistencies.
Immanuel Kant, an 18th-century German philosopher, is the most prominent proponent of deontological ethics. He believed that moral principles are grounded in reason, and individuals
possess a moral duty to act in a manner that adheres to these principles, regardless of the potential consequences. Kant's groundbreaking work, particularly his seminal work "Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals," outlined the core principles of deontological ethics and solidified his reputation as a leading figure in the field of moral philosophy (
Boje, 2014). Kant's work laid the foundation for deontological ethics, and it did not undergo significant
refinement through the work of later philosophers in the same way that other ethical frameworks,
such as virtue ethics, have been developed and refined over time. Kant's categorical imperative remains a central tenet of deontological ethics, and subsequent scholars have mainly focused on exploring its implications and applications.
One primary criticism of deontological ethics is its potential for inflexibility and the imposition of rigid moral rules. Critics argue that this approach may not adequately address complex moral dilemmas or real-life situations where moral obligations appear to conflict (
Hay,
3
1998). In public safety, adhering strictly to deontological principles might not allow for the necessary flexibility required to make situational judgments effectively. For instance, a police officer who is strictly bound by deontological principles might struggle to make on-the-spot decisions in high-pressure situations, as these principles may not account for the nuanced variables and outcomes in real-world scenarios.
Despite these criticisms, deontological ethics has significant applications in the field of public safety. It provides a strong and clear foundation for establishing codes of conduct and laws within public safety organizations. Public safety practitioners, particularly police officers and first responders, often rely on established rules and regulations to guide their actions. These rules, rooted in deontological principles, help ensure consistency, accountability, and a sense of moral clarity in an environment where quick and decisive actions are often required.
Furthermore, the deontological duty to protect and serve serves as a moral compass for individuals in public safety roles. The categorical imperative's emphasis on the inherent rightness
of certain actions, such as safeguarding lives and upholding the law, aligns closely with the values and personality traits of those drawn to the field of public safety. Police officers, for instance, are often driven by a strong sense of duty and a commitment to upholding the law, making deontological ethics a natural fit for the profession. In public safety, the deontological framework ensures that practitioners prioritize their moral obligations and responsibilities above all else, contributing to the preservation of public order, safety, and justice.
Teleological Ethics
Teleological ethics, often referred to as consequentialism, is a moral framework that evaluates the morality of actions based on their consequences. This ethical perspective emphasizes the end results and seeks to maximize the overall good or minimize harm. In the
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
context of public safety, teleological ethics plays a significant role in guiding decision-making processes. This discussion will delve into the main premises, notable philosophers, criticisms, and applications of teleological ethics in the realm of public safety.
The central premise of teleological ethics is the principle of utility, often associated with the philosopher John Stuart Mill. According to Mill's utilitarianism, actions are considered morally right if they produce the greatest overall happiness or the least amount of suffering. This principle aims to maximize the well-being of individuals and society as a whole. In teleological ethics, the focus is primarily on the consequences of actions, rather than the inherent nature of the actions themselves.
Teleological ethics distinguishes itself from deontological ethics, which emphasizes the intrinsic quality of actions, and virtue ethics, which centers on the development of virtuous character traits. While deontology relies on moral duties and universal principles, teleology focuses on achieving the best outcomes, regardless of the means used. For example, a deontologist might argue against lying in all circumstances, while a teleologist might accept lying if it leads to a greater overall good.
John Stuart Mill is the preeminent proponent of teleological ethics, and his work on utilitarianism, particularly outlined in his essay "Utilitarianism" (1861), significantly influenced the development of this ethical framework (
Miller, 2013). Mill provided a structured framework for assessing actions based on their contribution to human happiness. He argued for the importance of distinguishing between higher and lower pleasures, favoring intellectual and moral
pursuits over mere sensual pleasures, to achieve a more refined understanding of utility.
Refinements in teleological ethics have occurred over time. Philosopher Peter Singer expanded on utilitarian principles to address complex ethical issues, including animal rights and
5
global poverty. Singer's utilitarian approach includes the consideration of all sentient beings, extending the scope of teleological ethics to a broader moral landscape (
Miller, 2013). This refinement reflects the evolving nature of the teleological framework, adapting to modern ethical
challenges and incorporating a more inclusive perspective on consequences.
Critics of teleological ethics argue that it may justify morally questionable actions if they lead to a perceived greater good. For example, critics question whether it is ethical to sacrifice the rights or well-being of a minority for the happiness of the majority. Teleology's exclusive focus on outcomes may also neglect the rights and dignity of individuals, especially in situations where rights-based ethics, such as deontology, would protect those rights (
Miller, 2013).
In the field of public safety, teleological ethics has several applications. It is particularly useful in decision-making processes involving resource allocation, risk management, and crisis response. For instance, during a natural disaster, public safety officials may need to make choices
about deploying resources and prioritizing assistance to affected areas. Teleological ethics allows
them to assess the consequences of these decisions, aiming to minimize harm and maximize overall safety and well-being.
Teleological ethics also aligns with the values and personality traits of individuals drawn to the field of public safety. Public safety professionals often possess a strong sense of duty and a
commitment to safeguarding their communities. They are driven by a desire to protect and serve, which resonates with the utilitarian goal of maximizing overall happiness and minimizing suffering. In many cases, public safety practitioners inherently value the welfare and safety of the
public, making teleological ethics a relatable and practical framework for their work.
Furthermore, teleological ethics is applicable in assessing policies and regulations within the public safety sector. Decisions regarding public safety budgets, resource allocation, and risk
6
assessments can benefit from a teleological perspective, which prioritizes the most effective and beneficial outcomes for the community. By considering the consequences of these decisions, public safety agencies can ensure that their policies align with the goal of maximizing overall well-being and safety.
Virtue Ethics
Virtue ethics, rooted in ancient Greek philosophy and epitomized by philosophers such as
Aristotle and Plato, offers a distinct ethical framework that focuses on the development of virtuous character traits as the foundation of morality. Unlike deontological and teleological ethics, which emphasize rules or consequences, virtue ethics places a central emphasis on the moral qualities of individuals (
Gellera, 2017). This perspective is characterized by specific premises, key philosophers, criticisms, and practical applications.
The main premise of virtue ethics is the cultivation of virtuous character traits, which serve as the foundation for ethical action. Virtue ethicists argue that moral actions result from the
development of virtues such as honesty, courage, compassion, and wisdom. Instead of relying on specific rules or focusing solely on consequences, virtue ethics places greater importance on the character of the person making moral decisions. Virtue ethics also emphasizes the pursuit of eudaimonia, often translated as "human flourishing" or "living well," as the ultimate goal of human life.
Aristotle, one of the most influential proponents of virtue ethics, outlined this ethical perspective in his works, particularly in "Nicomachean Ethics." In this seminal text, Aristotle detailed the concept of eudaimonia and the importance of virtues in achieving a life of excellence
(
Gellera, 2017). He argued that virtues are developed through habituation and that ethical
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
7
decisions should reflect the golden mean, finding a balance between extremes of deficiency and excess.
While virtue ethics has its roots in ancient philosophy, it has undergone significant refinement through the work of modern philosophers. Alasdair MacIntyre, in "After Virtue" (1981), sought to revive and reformulate virtue ethics for contemporary moral discourse. MacIntyre emphasized the role of narrative and community in the development of virtues and moral reasoning, expanding the concept of virtue ethics beyond individual character development (
Thompson, 2017).
Virtue ethics faces various criticisms, including charges of cultural relativism and the potential lack of specific guidance in moral decision-making. Critics argue that virtues can vary across cultures and time periods, making it challenging to establish a universally applicable ethical framework. Moreover, virtue ethics may not offer clear answers in situations where virtues come into conflict, such as when courage and compassion seem incompatible.
In the field of public safety, virtue ethics offers a unique perspective and can play a significant role in guiding ethical decision-making. It works well to guide the type of work done in this discipline by fostering virtuous character traits among practitioners. Public safety professionals, such as police officers, firefighters, and emergency responders, often face challenging, high-stress situations where their character and values significantly influence their actions. Virtue ethics provides a foundation for cultivating qualities like honesty, courage, empathy, and compassion, which are essential in promoting trust, ethical behavior, and the well-
being of the community.
Virtue ethics is relatable to practitioners in public safety because it aligns with the values and personality traits commonly associated with individuals drawn to the field. Many who
8
pursue careers in public safety are motivated by a strong sense of duty, responsibility, and a desire to protect and serve their communities. These values resonate with the pursuit of virtuous character traits and ethical excellence. Virtue ethics acknowledges the inherent virtues that public
safety professionals often embody and encourages their development as an integral part of their role.
Furthermore, virtue ethics can be applied in public safety to evaluate the moral implications of organizational culture, policies, and decision-making. Public safety agencies can foster a culture that prioritizes the development of virtuous character traits among their personnel, promoting integrity, empathy, and moral excellence. Moreover, the assessment of policies related to community engagement, diversity, and accountability can be conducted through a virtue ethics lens, ensuring that the agency's actions align with virtuous principles.
9
References
Boje, D. M. (2014). Storytelling organizational practices: Managing in the quantum age
. Routledge.
Hay, I. (1998). Making moral imaginations. Research ethics, pedagogy, and professional human geography. Ethics, Place & Environment
, 1
(1), 55-75.
Miller, D. E. (2013). John Stuart Mill: Moral, Social, and Political Thought
. John Wiley & Sons.
Thompson, J. W. (2017). An Analysis of Alasdair MacIntyre's After Virtue
. CRC Press.
Gellera, G. (2017). An Analysis of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
. CRC Press.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help