Untitled document(11)
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Cerritos College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
100
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
Pages
3
Uploaded by AgentLapwingMaster1923
“Why are so Many Unarmed Black American Killed by the Police?” – Markman
1.
The author seems to indicate that police brutality and violence against Black
Americans is historically based. What biases/prejudices do people still have
against Black Americans that is seen in our history?
Throughout history, there have been prejudices against Black Americans,
including the belief that they are drug addicts and that they always desire to do
harm. Prejudices and biases against Black Americans have existed throughout
our history and continue to this day. The idea that Black Americans are inherently
violent is one form of racism. This stereotype makes the assumption that they are
always aggressive or dangerous, which is untrue for some people. The
presumption that Black Americans engage in drug-related activities is another
kind of racism. Thisstereotype reinforces unfavorable perceptions by falsely
linking Black Americans to criminal activity. To advance justice and equality for all
people, it is critical to acknowledge and combat these prejudices.
2.
Why do you think people continue to hold these bias or prejudicial views against
Black Americans?
I think those who have been exposed to false information about Black Americans
grow up to be prejudiced or bigoted toward them. Rather than understanding who
they truly are, they are being brought up based on how other people think certain
individuals should behave. They are merely looking at the cover of a book on
other planets. People who have been influenced by inaccurate information and
preconceptions about Black Americans are still inclined to have biased or
prejudicial views against them. Due to societal expectations and preconceptions
about Black Americans that are fostered by a lack of personal interaction,
prejudices against them are frequently passed down through the generations.
That is to say, instead of taking the time to comprehend the distinct experiences,
viewpoints and contributions to Black Americans, they are making snap
judgments about them based on flimsy attributes or preconceived thoughts.
Stated differently, their assessments are purely focused on outward appearances
or preconceptions, failing to take into account the rich diversity and complexity of
the Black American community.
3.
Markman, the author, offers some solutions at the end of his article. Do you think
these are good/viable solutions? Why or why not? And can you offer any other
solutions to this problem?
In my opinion, these are good options for the police since they allow them to
establish the proper discipline rather than constantly being subjugated by the
public.
"Ruling on Baker's Gay Wedding Cake Case" -- Rubin
1.
Justice Kennedy states, “religious and philosophical objections are protected,
[but] it is a general rule that such objections do not allow business owners and
other actors in the economy and in society to deny protected persons equal
access to goods and services under a neutral and generally applicable public
accommodations law" (1). This sounds like a good idea, but in reality there have
been many cases where religious business owners have denied services to
LGBTQ individuals or couples. Do you think business owners should have a right
to deny services to minority groups, including LGBTQ people? Why or why not?
Yes, in some situations, company owners should be able to reject service to
customers since they are still human. However, if the customer is acting rudely or
with a negative attitude, I do not believe it is appropriate to refuse service.
Refusing to accept service, however, is not regarded as the proper course of
action if there is no good basis for doing so. The response agrees that company
owners have rights but it also says that they shouldn’t use those rights to
discriminate against LGBTQ people or other minority groups.
2.
At the end of his ruling, Justice Kennedy believes the cases should be resolved
with "tolerance, without undue disrespect to sincere religious beliefs, and without
subjecting gay persons to indignities when they seek goods and services in an
open market." (3). How do you think we can balance religious freedom without
discrimination against minority groups, such as LGBTQ people?
In response, it is implied that individuals who discriminate on the basis of religion
might be doing so because it is what they have been taught and are familiar with.
In addition to emphasizing the fact that discrimination is still immoral, it
underscores how crucial it is to comprehend their viewpoint. The discussion of
mass shooting follows with the response claiming that some people’s pessimistic
attitudes have caused them to occur more frequently. Additionally it states that
this problem exists globally and is not exclusive to America. One cannot truly
hold individuals who discriminate based on religion responsible as it may be the
only thing they were taught and what they grew up believing. Nevertheless, it is
still immoral in any case.
“Many Mass Shootings…” – Jenkins
1.
Mass shootings have, unfortunately, become commonplace in America. Why do
you think these shootings have become more frequent?
Because some people simply have a negative mindset. Unfortunately, it affects
people everywhere throughout the world, not just in America.
2.
Jenkins discusses the issues of AR-15’s being used in mass shootings. Do you
think they should be banned for all citizens? Why or why not?
Yes, an AR-15 shouldn’t be a gun that the average citizen actually needs.
Because they contend that the average person really doesn’t require an AR-15,
they should be outlawed for all citizens. Although the logic behind this isn’t made
clear, it seems to imply that AR-15v is a deadly and possibly dangerous weapon
that isn’t required for regular civilian use.
3.
What would you propose to combat the problem of mass shootings in our
society?
Allowing people to keep their right to bear weapons while making every effort to
outlaw firearms. Aiming to restrict firearms as much as possible while preserving
the freedom of individuals to keep and bear arms is the suggested answer to the
issue of mass shootings in our society. In tracking the problem of mass
shootings, this strategy seeks to strike a balance while upholding each person’s
constitutional rights. It is thought that harder restrictions on gun ownership such
as waiting periods, background checks and bans on specific types of weapons
will make it harder for people who might endanger public safety to obtain
firearms. It’s crucial to make sure law-abiding folks can still exercise their rights,
though.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help