Order 1351217 - Applying ethical principles

.docx

School

Egerton University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

4050

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by wembe61

Running Head: APPLYING ETHICAL PRINCIPLES 1 Applying Ethical Principles Student’s Name Instructor’s Name Institution Course Date

APPLYING ETHICAL PRINCIPLES 2 Applying Ethical Principles Ethical qualities are fundamental for any medical care provider. They are significant because workers should perceive dilemmas and use sound judgment dependent on the patients' values and a clinical point of view. The four principles of medical care ethics are nonmaleficence, justice, autonomy, and beneficence (Jafari et al., 2019). Utilizing these principles concerning the ethical decision-making model can help medical experts to analyze ethical situations. Medical care experts plan, put together and administer the functions of the medical care facilities at which they work. Hence, they assume an imperative role in guaranteeing that patients get high quality and ethical medication. Medical care experts assume a significant role in facilitating decision-making about patients' care, especially when the circumstance may have ethical and moral dilemmas. Overview of the Case Study Jenna Smith and Chris Smith are first time guardians of five-day-old Ana and have a very natural viewpoint regarding parenthood. They both wish not to immunize Ana. They are intellectuals and clarifies that they have explored vaccines and seen the possible harm brought about by them far exceed any advantages. They notify their new pediatrician, Dr. Kerr, that they viewed mommy-blogs that portray how vaccines may have caused the inability to communicate well or autism in numerous kids. Dr. Kerr tunes in while Chris and Jenna defend their choice and comprehend the controversy between autism and vaccination that has become visible. At that point, Dr. Kerr commences to inform them regarding the advantages of immunizations and the dangers of not being inoculated. Dr. Kerr utilizes dependable resources and insights to influence Chris and Jenna. She briefs them regarding the decrease in child mortality over the previous century according to

APPLYING ETHICAL PRINCIPLES 3 immunizations. Dr. Kerr provides them with instances of information sources like Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, a global immunization wellbeing surveillance framework supported by the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control. It urges people to report unfavorable responses to immunizations so the national government can screen the products' safety. She keeps informing Jenna and Chris that no vaccine has proven to lead to autism or some other formative disorder. Dr. Kerr lastly proceeds to clarify that the vaccine would not merely be for Ana's advantage but also for other kids she interacts. For example, children with impaired immunity or kids who are too young to get specific vaccinations, or even kids with congenital infections can protect other children from being susceptible to particular illnesses. Despite the wealth of information that Dr. Kerr introduced to Jenna and Chris, they acknowledged to understand yet would not have Ana immunized. Dr. Kerr is uncertain what to do with regards to Jenna and Chris and their child Ana. She does not know whether she should regard Jenna and Chris's desires or ethically fulfill her obligations as Ana's pediatrician. Analysis of Ethical Issues in the Case Study For this case study, Dr. Kerr gets confronted with an ethical dilemma uncovered by Jenna and Chris Smith declining immunization for their five-year-old little girl Ana. Dr. Kerr realizes it is her commitment as a medical care provider to protect Ana from infection and illnesses using prophylaxis mediations. Jenna and Chris Smith disclose their exploration discoveries to Dr. Kerr, telling her the wellspring of their data was from mommy-blogs that they discovered on the web. Dr. Kerr is patient and lent them her ears while they talk about their interests. She, at that point, educates them regarding all the misguided judgments of the entire debate. She supported her information with evidential discoveries and sources to guarantee Jenna and Chris Smith would

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

APPLYING ETHICAL PRINCIPLES 4 accept realities and insights instead of assessments of peers. Dr. Kerr clarifies not only the advantages that Ana would have but also the way that it could put other youngsters in danger. Notwithstanding all the data introduced to Jenna and Chris, they remained by their choice to block Ana from getting immunizations. Dr. Kerr realizes that child inoculations contribute fundamentally to the overall population's strength, just as the individual vaccinated. This scenario is the ethical dilemma that Dr. Kerr is confronted with. Using the Ethical Decision-Making Model to Analyze the Case Study The ethical decision-making model's three essential steps incorporate moral judgment, moral awareness, and moral conduct. Moral judgment is choosing what is good and bad. This step possesses two deciding factors to base determination, including the attributes of an individual like inclinations, and the qualities of organizations like culture or pressing factors. Moral awareness is a person's sensitivity to another person's morals and values. The result of both moral judgment and moral awareness is moral conduct (ethical behavior). Moral conduct is the activity of making the best choice (Musbah et al., 2016). Dr. Kerr's ethical conduct is exhibited by how she acknowledges the significance of preventing communicable illnesses in youngsters by educating the Smith's about vaccinations and the benefits that come with immunization. Her ethical judgment gets revealed by her effort to supply Jenna and Chris Smith with adequate information regarding the matter to attempt to adjust their perspective of not permitting Ana to get vaccinated. Dr. Kerr trusts it is the best thing for her five-day-old patient to get vaccinated. Hence, this, at last, reflects her moral conduct to fix this difficulty. Effectiveness of Communication Approaches in the Case Study Since Dr. Kerr is Ana's pediatrician and making Ana her patient is critical to comprehend that Dr. Kerr is the interfacing point between the Smiths and their daughter Ana regarding

APPLYING ETHICAL PRINCIPLES 5 clinical advice or practices. The two players assume an indispensable part in Ana's prosperity since Ana cannot settle on her own clinical treatment choices. Dr. Kerr, Chris, and Jenna must have excellent communication to do what is best for Ana. The way that Jenna and Chris both communicated their vaccination concerns and the connection they presume it has to autism to Dr. Kerr shows an exceptional communication between Dr. Kerr and the Smith's. Active attention and understanding that Dr. Kerr shows also depict that she does not simply wish to force her convictions on the Smith's. Instead provides them with information to assist them in being completely mindful of their choice. She gave them research and dependable resources, gauged advantages and risks, and clarified that it would not simply be significant for Ana but also for other youngsters. Even though Dr. Kerr gave vital information with proof to support it, it was as yet insufficient to influence Smith's choice. Dr. Kerr did whatever she thought was correct and what she believed she was ethically committed to accomplishing for Ana as her pediatrician. Listening and communicating establishes healthy patient-doctor relationships and is an approach to construct trust and rapport. However, Dr. care could have used visual aids that show different images between vaccinated and unvaccinated children for the Smith's to realize the effect of not considering vaccination for their child. Resolving the Ethical Dilemma by Applying Ethical Principles This contextual study shows each of the four ethical principles, beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. Dr. Kerr comprehends that Jenna and Chris Smith reserve a privilege to choose Ana's clinical treatment regarding their autonomy. Dr. Kerr wants to have Ana immunized, which shows beneficence, to secure her and other kids she interacts with,

APPLYING ETHICAL PRINCIPLES 6 which shows nonmaleficence; she treats Jenna and Chris Smith reasonably and without predisposition by listening and understanding what they need to state, which shows justice. Maybe Dr. Kerr could provide Smith's alternatives with regards to vaccines. Dr. Kerr could recommend having the opportunity to consider everything before settling on a solid choice and send them back home with extra information to look on to guarantee they are completely instructed regarding the matter. Dr. Kerr could likewise recommend getting a few antibodies and quit others. Ana is just five days old and has time before getting enlisted into a school where it is necessary to get vaccinated. Unquestionably Dr. Kerr would need to keep up the patients' autonomy without driving certain convictions. Yet, more data and time concerning the issue may help Jenna and Chris Smith's awareness and comprehension regarding immunizations in children. Conclusion Ethical dilemmas can get settled by utilizing the moral decision-making model and the four principles of medical care ethics. Having a solid connection among patients and doctors can help when ethical dilemmas emerge. Dr. Kerr, Jenna, and Chris Smith communicated their views of the situation. Giving Jenna and Chris Smith different alternatives regarding immunizations may help them not feel constrained, knowing there are other pathways. Having Dr. Kerr provide these options can help the Smiths feel freer to realize that their pediatrician is not just thinking of her moral commitment as a medical care provider yet mull over their interests. This way, letting Dr. Kerr keep up the standards of medical care ethics.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

APPLYING ETHICAL PRINCIPLES 7 References Jafari, H., Khatony, A., Abdi, A., & Jafari, F. (2019). Nursing and midwifery students’ attitudes towards principles of medical ethics in Kermanshah, Iran. BMC medical ethics , 20(1), 1- 6. Musbah, A., Cowton, C. J., & Tyfa, D. (2016). The role of individual variables, organizational variables and moral intensity dimensions in Libyan management accountants’ ethical decision making. Journal of Business ethics, 134(3), 335-358.