Case Study

.docx

School

Ashford University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

208

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Jun 12, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

6

Uploaded by AmbassadorRose14617

1 Operation: Organ Freedom University of Arizona Global Campus Operation: Organ Freedom
2 Molly Nash was diagnosed with the rare genetic disease known as Fanconi Anemia or Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). This condition is known to affect the spongy material inside the bone, leading to gradual deterioration. Unfortunately, the limited knowledge of the disorder at the time meant that the life expectancy rate was no more than 10 years for Molly. This disease is passed down through family genetics and affects the bone marrow. The most feasible treatment option is a bone marrow transplant from a matching sibling donor, which was not available to Molly at the time. The family searched for help in the 90’s but many children did not survive bone marrow transplants that were to no relation to them. It would be rejected because they could not receive the proper amount of radiation and chemotherapy for the repair of the children's DNA. In August of 2000, the Wagner family received a miracle when Adam Nash was born via embryo selection. This innovative technique, however, was highly controversial at the time, with many people considering it as an act of Dr. Wagner attempting to play God. Embryo selection involves screening the embryos before implantation to choose the one with the least likelihood of carrying the disease. The procedure involves in vitro fertilization, where eggs are fertilized with sperm outside the body and implanted into the uterus. In the case of the Nash family, the selection process was done to ensure that the baby would not carry the same disease as their daughter Molly. While the ethics of embryo selection may still be debated, there is no doubt that the procedure has given hope to families faced with genetic disorders. The story of the Nash family's journey highlights the importance of scientific innovation and the ethical considerations that come with it for the future.
3 Is it moral for parents to conceive a child to save the life of a sibling? (150) The decision to conceive a child with the sole purpose of saving the life of another sibling is a complex ethical issue that raises many questions. Society has yet to provide a clear consensus on this matter, and opinions are divided. On one hand, some people believe that the well-being of the child being born or the sibling in need of assistance should be the priority. On the other hand, others believe that this practice infringes on the child's independent rights and should be avoided. These varying beliefs are rooted in religious, cultural, and individual opinions and reflect the complexity of the issue. While some may highlight the well-being of their family and see organ donation as the best way to save their child's life, others may view this as a violation of the child's autonomy and choose to explore alternative options. Regardless of the decision made, it is important to approach this issue with careful consideration and respect for all parties involved. As with any ethical predicament, there are no easy answers, and it is up to the parents to weigh the options and make a decision that aligns with their values and beliefs. Is it moral to conceive to save a sibling's life?
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help