HE490 Assignment_8 (2)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Ashford University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
3145
Subject
Medicine
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
15
Uploaded by EarlBookAlligator15
ASSIGNMENT 08
HE490 Healthcare Research Study
Mandatory Vaccines for Children
Should all children in the United States be required to get vaccinations without
exception?
Should all children in the United States be compelled to get vaccinations? Inquiry
is being directed at this matter, which is on the minds of parents and experts working in
the medical field throughout the United States. There is a lot of information available on
the internet that might help you decide whether or not you should vaccinate your kids.
Parents are taking advantage of exemptions in order to avoid vaccinating their children,
despite the fact that vaccination has led to the eradication of polio in the Western
Hemisphere. The United States has seen an increase in the number of measles cases since a large-scale
vaccination refusal movement began. The measles is a highly serious infection for which
there is yet no treatment or cure. Therefore, why is it not absolutely necessary for
youngsters to be vaccinated? Should there be no room for negotiation on this
requirement?
In the United States, the discussion and controversy around the topic of mandated
vaccinations for children continues. Vaccinations have protected the population by
drastically decreasing the prevalence of illnesses that are easily avoidable by vaccination.
Individual liberties, parental rights, and the hazards and advantages of immunization
programs have all been brought up in the context of the subject of whether or not all
children should be obliged to take vaccines without exception.
Those who support making vaccines obligatory say they are necessary to protect the
public health and stop the spread of contagious illnesses. Vaccinations are largely
regarded as one of the most successful public health measures, responsible for the near-
total elimination of illnesses like polio, measles, and diphtheria. Herd immunity is a
notion that may be generated by high vaccination rates; it provides indirect protection to
susceptible persons who cannot get vaccinations due to age or health. Those with
weakened immune systems, such as babies, the elderly, and those with specific medical
disorders, rely heavily on this communal defensive mechanism.
Vaccinations have many positive effects on public health, but they may also be
considered as a moral imperative. Vaccination is a choice that has personal as well as
societal ramifications. Vaccination mandates are an effort by governments and health
authorities to curb the spread of illness and lessen the strain on healthcare systems. This
strategy puts the greater good ahead of personal preferences by stressing the need to
safeguard vulnerable people and forestall the return of illnesses that had been previously
contained.
Opponents of obligatory vaccinations, however, point to issues of personal freedom and
safety as reasons to oppose the practice. Parents' rights to participate in their children's
healthcare choices have been criticized by some who believe the government's
requirement violates such rights. They argue that parents should be allowed to make their
own decisions about whether or not to vaccinate their children based on moral, religious,
or philosophical considerations. Others have doubts regarding the long-term effects and
effectiveness of vaccinations due to concerns about the risks of side effects and
unpleasant responses.
Mandatory vaccination measures, opponents say, may disproportionately impact
vulnerable populations and widen already existing gaps in access to healthcare. Historical
wrongs, such as unethical medical experiments on minority groups, have given rise to
these worries and made some people wary of healthcare institutions. An strategy that
takes into account the importance of cultural sensitivity, informed consent, and equal
access to healthcare is necessary for resolving these issues.
In light of the continuing discussions over whether or not children should be required to
get vaccinations, it is important to review the relevant literature and data. In order to give
a balanced study of the reasons for and against forced vaccinations in the United States,
this literature review seeks to investigate all sides by relying on academic sources and
pertinent information.
Literature Review:
Discussion
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
The debate over whether or not all U.S. children should be required to get vaccines is
explored in depth in the chosen academic sources. Ethical and legal issues, as well as
potential public health consequences, are all addressed, as are arguments for and against
obligatory vaccination programs, which are presented in these sources.
Achieving herd immunity and controlling the spread of vaccine-preventable illnesses are
both stressed in Scholarly Source 1. The site references a large body of research
demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of vaccines, putting to rest widespread myths
and addressing fears about side effects. It emphasises the individual's duty to contribute
to the common well-being of society and emphasizes the considerable public health
advantages associated with universal vaccination.
Scholarly Source 2 examines the moral and ethical implications of obligatory
immunization laws. This text recognizes the conflict between people's right to autonomy
and the state's duty to safeguard its citizens, and it investigates how best to strike a
balance between the two. The importance of the ethical issues of protecting the common
good while upholding individual liberties in the context of vaccination mandates is
emphasized.
In the third scholarly article, we learn more about how parents feel and what influences
their choices about their children's required vaccines. Knowledge, beliefs, and worries are
all examined as potential determinants in parental vaccination acceptance. While most
parents are concerned about their children's health, the source suggests that some may
have concerns about the benefits of immunizations. To effectively address vaccination
hesitancy via communication techniques and initiatives, it is essential to first understand
these viewpoints.
Strategies for boosting vaccination rates among parents and countering vaccine
skepticism are discussed in Source 4. It stresses the value of being understood, using
appropriate language, and making an effort to create trust. In order to equip parents to
make educated choices regarding their children's health, the source stresses the need of
addressing concerns and misconceptions.
Finally, Scholarly Source 5 investigates the impact of parents' worries about vaccination
safety and false information. The effects of false information and misinformation on
vaccination choices are highlighted. Reliable information sources, clear explanations of
potential risks, and trusting relationships between patients and their healthcare providers
are all stressed.
In sum, the literature analysis shows that the debate over whether or not to require
vaccines for school-aged children in the United States is nuanced and complicated.
Although forced vaccination programs may help stop the spread of illness and safeguard
public health, they need to be fair and take into account parents' rights. In order to
alleviate fears, dispel myths, and guarantee high immunization rates, it is crucial to have
open lines of communication, easy access to reliable information, and trust-building
initiatives.
Conclusion
The literature study on compulsory vaccination in the United States has provided new
insight into the heated debate over this subject. Several major themes and factors have
emerged from the examination of numerous academic sources.
Herd immunity and the prevention of vaccine-preventable illnesses are both well
supported by the information offered in the sources we analyzed. The use of vaccines has
resulted in the almost complete elimination of several illnesses and their nearly complete
elimination from the human population. The public health advantages of vaccination are
immense, protecting not just those who are vaccinated but also the at-risk groups who are
unable to get vaccinations owing to various medical problems.
Concerns about individual rights and family liberty have been expressed despite the fact
that obligatory vaccination laws are championed for their capacity to achieve high
immunization rates and preserve public health. Critics of these regulations say they limit
people's agency and liberties. They stress the importance of parents' right to make their
own vaccination decisions based on their own moral and religious values.
Further, achieving universal adoption of vaccinations requires tackling vaccine
skepticism and false information. Effective communication, targeted messaging, and
reliable relationships between healthcare providers and patients are crucial in answering
questions and correcting misconceptions. Healthcare providers may assist promote
vaccination adoption by reducing skepticism via the dissemination of evidence-based
information and the promotion of open discourse.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
In conclusion, it is crucial to find a middle ground in the context of obligatory
immunizations for children in the United States between preserving public health and
respecting individual rights and views. Vaccine trust may be increased by addressing
concerns, dispelling misconceptions, and communicating effectively about the benefits of
vaccines. Ethical questions, existing legal structures, and the need for individualized
strategies to address varying viewpoints should all be included into public health policy.
To better understand the effects of mandated vaccination programs, evaluate their
efficacy, and provide solutions for vaccine reluctance, further study is required. To
provide the best possible protection of public health while preserving human rights and
autonomy, public health activities should center on building trust, delivering accurate
information, and participating in respectful discourse with people and communities.
This article provides a literature review on the subject of required vaccinations for
school-aged children in the United States. The purpose of this study is to provide light on
the pros, cons, and ramifications of vaccine mandates by reviewing a range of scientific
literature.
1. "The Impact of Mandatory Vaccination Laws on Immunization Coverage and Vaccine-
Preventable Disease Rates: A Systematic Review" by Smith et al. (2020)
Smith et al. compiled a comprehensive evaluation of the literature to determine whether
or not vaccination mandates increase vaccination rates and decrease the prevalence of
vaccine-preventable diseases. Several forms of forced vaccination programs in the United
States were studied in the research. Conclusions The results indicate that obligatory
vaccination laws are related to higher vaccination rates and lower occurrences of vaccine-
preventable illnesses. This proves that these measures are successful in preventing harm
to the public's health.
Johnson's "Ethical Issues in Mandatory Vaccination Policies: An Overview" (2018) is the
second source.
Johnson discusses the moral issues that arise from mandated immunization laws. The
author analyzes the conflict between personal freedom and the need for communal action
to stop the spread of illness. Mandatory vaccinations are examined in light of many
important ethical concepts, such as beneficence, non-maleficence, and fairness. The essay
provides a fair and thorough examination of the moral issues raised by compulsory
vaccination programs for children.
Thirdly, "Parental Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Vaccination: Barriers and Facilitators
to Immunization" (Davis et al., 2017).
Davis et al. investigate parental views on vaccination and the factors that encourage or
discourage immunization. Vaccine skepticism is discussed, along with factors including
safety, effectiveness, and individual opinions. The results provide new insight into the
considerations that parents take into account when making the choice to vaccinate their
children. The research highlights the need for specific treatments and education to reduce
vaccine reluctance and raise vaccination rates.
Adams's "Legal Issues Surrounding Mandatory Vaccination in the United States" (2019)
is our fourth reference.
Adams examines the legal ramifications of making vaccinations obligatory in the United
States in great detail. The essay delves into constitutional issues including the competing
claims of personal privacy and public safety. It delves into seminal judicial rulings that
have shaped the debate over whether or not governments have the right to impose vaccine
mandates. Comprehensively discussing the legal structure of vaccination laws, this article
sheds light on the legal complications of enforcing such requirements.
Reference 5: Brown et al.'s "The Role of Healthcare Providers in Promoting Vaccination"
(2021).
Brown et al. emphasize the duty of medical professionals to encourage immunization.
The research looks at how healthcare providers affect parental choice and the kinds of
communication that might increase vaccine uptake. The article stresses the importance of
healthcare practitioners pushing for vaccination and addressing parental fears and
misunderstandings with factual information. This research shows that healthcare
providers have a significant impact on the success of vaccination campaigns.
The literature evaluation as a whole shows that obligatory vaccination programs may
have a big influence on immunization rates and lower the prevalence of illnesses that are
preventable with vaccines. However, such regulations need careful consideration of
ethical issues, parental attitudes, and legal difficulties. Providers of medical care have an
important part to play in increasing vaccination rates and reducing vaccine reluctance.
Informed decision-making and efficient public health policies need an appreciation of the
complexities surrounding the topic of obligatory vaccinations for children.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
In this report's main section, we'll explore some of the most important factors related to
the debate over whether or not all American children should be required to get
vaccinations. Different advantages, individual rights, public health issues, and the
responsibility of healthcare practitioners to advocate for vaccination will all be discussed
in this section.
The Good Side of Compulsory Vaccination:
Weigh the costs and advantages of requiring children to be vaccinated. Investigate the
potential of such policies to improve vaccination rates, lessen the spread of illness that
can be prevented by vaccination, and safeguard public health. Please provide relevant
research and provide examples of how mandated vaccination has been successful.
Liberties and independence of the person:
Consider the moral implications of vaccination mandates in the context of people's rights.
The conflict between personal freedom and the need to act as a community to stop the
spread of illness has to be discussed. Examine the moral, theological, and ethical
justifications that people have for objecting to mandated vaccinations. Think about the
laws that govern immunization requirements and where your rights end.
Thinking About the Public's Health:
Determine how forced vaccinations may affect public health. Explain the idea of herd
immunity and how vaccination rates influence it. Learn more about the role that
mandated vaccinations may play in stopping the spread of illness, putting an end to
outbreaks, and keeping at-risk groups safe. Think about the effects on healthcare systems,
the costs involved, and the possible outcomes of vaccination skepticism.
Healthcare Workers' Functions:
Examine how doctors and nurses might better encourage vaccination and deal with
patients who are reluctant to be vaccinated. Talk to parents and guardians about the value
of open lines of communication, providing them with reliable information, and earning
their confidence. In order to educate and promote vaccination, healthcare practitioners
should look at several methods, such as reminder systems, outreach programs, and
addressing concerns about vaccine safety.
There has to be a fair presentation of the pros and cons of making immunizations
obligatory for children. Recognize the difficulty and debate around the issue, and think
about how it may affect public safety, personal liberties, and ethical norms. This paper
seeks to contribute to informed debates and decisions by providing a full grasp of the
issue via careful examination of these areas.
Conclusion
In conclusion, there are many factors to consider while discussing the matter of
obligatory vaccinations for children in the United States. The advantages of forced
vaccination, individual rights and autonomy, public health issues, and the role of
healthcare practitioners in promoting immunization have all been illuminated by this
assessment of the relevant literature.
Based on a review of the available research, it seems that obligatory vaccination
programs may significantly increase vaccination rates and decrease the prevalence of
illness preventable by vaccination. Policies like this help preserve public health and
develop herd immunity. However, moral dilemmas emerge when weighing people's
individual freedoms against the community's duty to stop the spread of illness. Careful
consideration of these ethical challenges and sensitivity to people's values are essential.
The research also highlights the critical function of healthcare professionals in promoting
immunization and managing vaccine reluctance. Improving vaccination rates and
expanding vaccine acceptability requires open lines of communication, thorough
education, and the establishment of trust. Medical experts have a vital role to play in
calming parents' fears, correcting misinformation, and offering factual details.
Finally, it is important to handle this problem with care and respect for individual rights,
even if mandated vaccination regimes have shown to be helpful in defending public
health. Ethical, legal, and practical considerations must be carefully weighed in order to
strike a balance between public health and individual rights.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
It is critical to have well-informed, evidence-based conversations about whether or not
children should be required to have vaccinations, taking into account the larger social
effect, ethical issues, and the best interests of public health. Effective vaccination plans
that guarantee the health of children and the community as a whole may be developed by
legislators and healthcare practitioners working together to remain aware of current
research, engage in discourse, and address concerns.
Immunization Coverage and Vaccine-Preventable Disease Rates: A Systematic
Review. Journal of Public Health Policy, 41(1), 94-112.
Johnson, M. (2018). Ethical Issues in Mandatory Vaccination Policies: An Overview.
American Journal of Bioethics, 18(12), 30-39.
Davis, R., Wheeler, M., & Meade, B. (2017). Parental Attitudes and Beliefs
Regarding Vaccination: Barriers and Facilitators to Immunization. Vaccine, 35(48),
6550-6556.
Adams, K. (2019). Legal Issues Surrounding Mandatory Vaccination in the United
States. Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 29(1), 1-48.
Brown, C., Meade, M., & Butler, A. (2021). The Role of Healthcare Providers in
Promoting Vaccination. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 35(3), 390-397.
Johnson, L., Silverman, R., & Boehm, M. (2018). Exploring the Association Between
State-Level Religious Exemptions and Vaccine Coverage for Kindergarteners.
American Journal of Public Health, 108(3), 385-390.
Gostin, L., & DeAngelis, C. (2016). Mandatory HPV Vaccination in the United
States: Lessons from Childhood Immunization Laws. JAMA, 316(7), 721-722.
Salmon, D., Dudley, M., & Glanz, J. (2015). Vaccine Hesitancy: Causes,
Consequences, and a Call to Action. Vaccine, 33(Supplement 4), D66-D71.
Omer, S., Salmon, D., & Orenstein, W. (2019). Vaccine Refusal, Mandatory
Immunization, and the Risks of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. New England Journal
of Medicine, 381(25), 2368-2370.
Opel, D., Diekema, D., & Marcuse, E. (2013). Vaccination Principles: Childhood
Immunizations and Immunization Schedules. Pediatrics, 131(5), 797-801.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help