PGMT320 7.3.1 Discussion Case Study AmeriHealth Mercy

docx

School

Charleston Southern University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

MISC

Subject

Management

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by ChancellorBookWallaby8

Report
1. Describe three final details that must be considered before a project can be complete 2. Summarize a complete project, including initiation, establishment, development, and assessment 3. Develop a personal management approach 4. Establish realistic goals for managing a successful project 5. Develop a working project calendar Reflecting on what you have learned in this course about maturity models and benchmarking. Examine application of maturity models and benchmarking in the following case study. Describe the tools used to improve the organization's project management maturity level. What was the result? https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/amerihealth-mercy-family-companies-10463 AmeriHealth Mercy is a national organization who has a demanding and versatile business portfolio. Being a mission driven organization, they maintain a continuously evolving, yet challenging variety of projects to help introduce new products and expand into new geographic areas. RuthAnne Guerrero, Vice President of PMO and Process Improvement for AmeriHealth Mercy, wanted to maximize the effectiveness of it’s project management processes by identifying opportunities where they could improve performance and improve its abilities to define, manage, and deliver projects in support of company goals. Having such a diversified company portfolio with business expanding into many geographical locations made external benchmarking a bad option. RuthAnne opted to hire a Project Management Institute (PMI) Certified Consultant to conduct an Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3) ProductSuite Assessment of internal operations. Her beliefs were comparative to Hillson in that a successful business will be the one that manages its projects effectively, maximize competitive benefits; while minimizing the risks (Hillson 2001). OPM3 focuses on three key elements: Knowledge, Assessment, and Improvement. AmeriHealth Mercy had previously participated in an online version of the assessment, but wanted to have a certified consultant work with and analyze current practices in real time. OPM3® helps organizations understand their project management processes, ensures that their projects are tied to the organization’s larger strategy, and measures and guides their capabilities for improvement. Data is collected from most if not all of the ten project management knowledge areas (PMBOK p. 23-25) based on determined best practices. Additionally, focus on Enterprise Environmental Factors (EEFs) internal to the organization are analyzed and considered when comparing against industry peers (PMBOK p. 37-39). Once completed, the assessment provides a baseline for measuring the procedures and processes used to advance the maturity of the organization based on factual, quantified and qualified information (PSCG p.3). AmeriHealth’s PMO organized a team to implement improvements in areas suggested by the assessment such as adding core portfolio processes for project management, choosing projects that align with organizational strategy, and controlling project costs. The PMO also included the provision that all projects will have one or more criteria that can be used as measures of performance (MOPs). AmeriHealth Mercy started to prioritize projects based on four key project performance indicators that best suit strategic goals, instituted a Strategic Value Assessment tool with ten questions for preliminary choosing projects, developed a RASCI Diagram that identifies a project’s deliverables and person(s) responsible, and they started a standardization of documents used by the PMO group.
Utilizing all of the information collected, analyzed, and redistributed by the OPM3 ProductSuite Assessment in the form of industry best practice strategies, practices, and procedures, has given AmeriHealth Mercy’s PMO a new sense of competitiveness and inspiration to continue improving its processes and project portfolio. As a firm grows in project maturity, it begins to adopt new practices, starts programs pursuant of suggestions by other project management professionals, establishes procedures and processes for initiating and controlling its projects, and articulates both internal and external best practice procedures to become more mature in project management ( Pinto, 2018 p. 22). References and Sources AmeriHealth Mercy Family of Companies (2009). PMI Case Study.https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/amerihealth-mercy-family-companies-10463 Hillson, D. (2001). Benchmarking organizational project management capability. Paper presented at Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium, Nashville, TN. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. Pinto, J. K. (2018). Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage. *5th Edition). Pearson Education Project Strategy Consulting Group (2013). OPM3® Assessments Overview. http://www.projectstrategy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/OPM3-Assessments-Overview- Web-20131101.pdf
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help