The Pros and Cons of a Mixed Method Research Design

docx

School

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

MISC

Subject

Management

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by BailiffPartridgePerson957

Report
1 The Pros and Cons of a Mixed Method Research Design Name Institutional Affiliation Course Professor Date
2 The Pros and Cons of a Mixed Method Research Design Introduction The most significant part of any study is the research methodology section, which lays out the framework that integrates all other research components. Thus, the sufficiency of data analysis and collection depends on the chosen research strategy. According to Hafsa (2019), mixed methods research designs are the procedures utilized in collecting and analyzing data utilizing quantitative and qualitative research methods within a single study. Qualitative and quantitative research methods are thus utilized in data collection, analysis, and inference when researchers utilize the mixed methods research design. Mixed methods designs and their use have acquired extensive interest from researchers as they enable them to utilize the strength of each approach to offset any weakness. However, the method has limitations, such as high costs and time-consuming. Therefore, it is imperative to ass the pros and cons of mixed-method research designs, which can guide the use of the technique in research studies. Pros One main pro of mixed method research design is providing more rich data. The research methods provide more and richer data than the one provided by a single methods approach. With more data, the researcher is more likely to provide better statistical analysis, resulting in authentic, quality, and credible research outcomes (McKim, 2017). The rich data the mixed methods research designs provide is precious when exploring complex social phenomena. Besides, mixed methods research designs provide a broader perspective than a single design method. Therefore, the methods can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research problem. This approach combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to offer a wider view of the issue. Mixed methods research designs are also beneficial due to their objectivity. They allow the researcher to immerse themselves in research by allowing the use of quantitative and qualitative research methods. Using qualitative research methods, the researcher can conduct interviews and use observation for studies (McKim, 2017). To test a theory, the researcher can use questionnaires and statistical analysis in the same study, which results in authentic and quality outcomes. Lastly, mixed research methods can enhance the validity of findings by addressing the limitations of each method. The limitations that may be evident in using a qualitative research approach in a study can be addressed by the strengths of quantitative research method (Turner et al., 2017). The same applies to the weakness of the quantitative research methods, which the strengths of qualitative research methods can address to enhance the validity of the research findings. Cons One of the drawbacks of using mixed methods is that it is time-consuming. It entails using quantitative and qualitative approaches simultaneously, which requires the researcher to follow some vital steps when collecting and analyzing data (McKim, 2017). Thus, the complexity that comes with the use of the two approaches can make its use very time- consuming.
3 Besides. Mixed methods are cumbersome and require skilled experts, which might be costly and resource-intensive. The methods require a larger research time and a larger budget than required for a single approach to collect, analyze, and interpret data from qualitative and quantitative sources. Furthermore, the likelihood of personal bias is high when mixed-method research designs are utilized in studies. A researcher who prefers qualitative research can choose the conclusive solution it provides without considering the findings of other research methods (Turner et al., 2017). Thus, without careful consideration and a balance of the findings from the two approaches, the mixed methods might generate a biased conclusion. Conclusion Mixed methods have gradually expanded to several research fields due to their many benefits. Some benefits researchers enjoy from using mixed methods include a broader perspective, rich data, objectivity, and increased validity of findings. Despite the numerous benefits, there are some cons to using mixed methods, such as being time-consuming, resource- intensive, costly, and subject to personal bias. Ultimately, the choice of the research design should align with the researcher’s goals and research questions.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
4 References Hafsa, N.-E. (2019). Mixed Methods Research: An Overview for Beginner Researchers. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics , 58 . https://doi.org/10.7176/jlll/58-05 McKim, C. A. (2017). The Value of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research , 11 (2), 202–222. sagepub. Turner, S. F., Cardinal, L. B., & Burton, R. M. (2017). Research Design for Mixed Methods. Organizational Research Methods , 20 (2), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115610808