9278

docx

School

Korea University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

101

Subject

Management

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

13

Uploaded by ikomaljaved

Report
Topic: In what ways and to what extent are the benefits of workplace learning dependent upon the link between the learning strategy and business strategy?
INTRODUCTION Workplace learning refers to the process through which individuals gain new knowledge, abilities and skills in the course of their employment. Companies need this kind of learning because it helps them hire employees who have the skills they need to stay competitive in their business. Onyemelukwe, Ferreira and Ramos (2023) claim that workplace learning is an important part of HR strategies because it works with the overall business strategy and makes sure that workers have the skills they need to do their jobs well. moreover, Minton and Lowe (2019) also looked at workplace learning, which includes several types of learning that happen at work, such as guidance, counselling, job rotation, cross-functional training, observing jobs, training programmes, online education modules, workshops, seminars and conferences. The goal of these educational efforts is to make employees better at their jobs, make them more efficient and help the organisation reach its goals and objectives. Additionally, Alerasoul et al. (2022) stated that workplace learning is an important part of HR strategy because it helps companies build a workforce that is adaptable, creative and able to change with the times. Likewise, it improves staff involvement, contentment and employment, consequently diminishing expenses related to employee turnover. Moreover, workplace learning plays a significant role in promoting the growth of a learning organisation, which is distinguished by ongoing learning, the exchange of knowledge and the cultivation of innovation ( Billett, 2023). This assignment aims to examine the correlation between learning strategy and business strategy in the healthcare sector. THE LINK BETWEEN LEARNING STRATEGY AND BUSINESS STRATEGY To stay successful in today's fast-paced business world, companies must adjust to new technologies, shifting market conditions and customer needs. The only way for companies to do
this is to spend on developing a workforce that has the skills and knowledge to deal with these problems. This is where it is very important for the learning strategy and the business strategy to work together ( Bryson, 2018). The business's learning strategy is its plan about the way it can enhance the skills and knowledge of its employees so that it can reach its business goals. To make sure it helps the business reach its goals, a well-integrated learning strategy should be in line with the overall business strategy. This connection is important because it makes sure that the learning programs are useful, successful and in line with the company's strategic goals ( Sykes, 2022). However, Fleming and Zegwaard (2018) contend that there are several ways that an integrated learning strategy can help a business strategy to its goals and objectives. Moreover, it helps businesses train employees who can adapt, come up with new ideas and work well with others in changing business settings. Organisations can confirm their employees is prepared to fulfil organisational difficulties and maintain competitiveness by providing them with the suitable expertise and abilities. The research by Zhang et al. (2020) demonstrate that this helps companies reach their goals, such as making more money, making more products and making clients satisfied. The research by Antunes and Pinheiro (2020) also stated that a company can become a learning organisation with the aid of an integrated learning strategy. A learning group keeps learning and shares the things it knows and new concepts. When employees are encouraged to learn new things all the time, business can make certain they can adapt to new stratergies, changing customer needs and changing market conditions. Furthermore, Istanti, Sanusi and Daengs (2020) stated that many companies want to be more competitive, make more money and keep their customers satisfied. An integrated learning strategy can also help the employees who work for them become extremely capable at what they do, that helps them to reach their goals.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
companies can make sure their employees can do their responsibilities well by giving them the incomes and details they need. This supports the company meet its objectives, like getting more products and having satisfied customers. Contarily, Holbeche (2023) examined that companies need an integrated learning strategy to make a workforce that is flexible, creative and able to work with new business strategies. It also helps create a learning organisation and a staff that works hard, which are both important for meeting business goals. Because of this, companies that want to get the most out of their learning strategy should make sure it fits in with their general business strategy. COMPARISON OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL LEARNING IN THE WORKPLACE The workplace offers many ways for individuals to gain new information and skills. There are a lot of different ways to learn, such as formal and informal methods. At some times and places, it is acceptable to learn in a formal setting, such as with the help of an instructor or trainer. Some parts of it are training for students and discussion groups (Kaukko and Wilkinson, 2020). The opposite is informal learning, which develops easily at work through everyday interactions and conversations (Silvestru and Silvestru, 2019). When it comes to jobs, official and informal learning are not the same. Choi (2021) says that formal learning is a planned way of getting information that includes clear goals, specific topics and set times for each job. It is also given through formal training, which can be done by people inside or outside the company. In addition, Getting a formal education can help communities in many ways. For instance, it makes sure that all employees get the same training, which makes the workforce smarter and more capable (Cerasoli et al., 2018). This is especially significant for jobs that require a lot of specialised abilities and information, like healthcare. A formal education also supports employees follow company rules and guidelines by teaching them the correct way to do things.
Using this strategy can lower threats and make procedures run more smoothly overall (Peters and Romero, 2019). In contrast Greenhow and Lewin (2019) also examine that the healthcare industry can reach its goals easily by using both formal and informal learning strategies. Teaching and learning can benefit employees learn new things and get improved at things that are significant to the industry. The needs of the business can be taken into account when planning customised training courses and workshops. Moreover, it systematically combine learning programs with business strategy, it makes sure that employees have the skills and information they need to help the business succeed. This link also makes sure that learning programmes work well and are in line with the company's culture and values. Consequently, this relationship makes it easier for workers to do a better job, which increases engagement and motivation. Additionally, it motivates them to keep learning new skills and moving up in the healthcare field. In addition, formal learning helps companies determine how well their training programmes are working by giving tests and evaluations. By using facts, this provide them the knowledge to make smart decisions about their future learning. However, Greenhow and Lewin (2019) indicated that formal education has certain drawbacks. Creating and implementing formal education programmes can take a lot of time and money for businesses, especially when they need to hire outside trainers or use new technologies. Additionally, formal education cannot always provide people with the flexibility and adaptability they need to be successful in environments that change quickly and are always changing. Formal training programmes cannot always adapt to the changing needs of both the company and its workers because of the way they are structured and when they occur. therefore, formal education occasionally appears disconnected from real-world applications, which can make students not want to learn and not remember what they have learned (Roberts et al., 2018).
On the other hand, Colognesi, Van Nieuwenhoven and Beausaert (2020) described that informal learning happens naturally at work, usually through observation, thought and working together. Its ability to adapt and stay useful in different situations essentially makes it unique. Organisations can derive multiple advantages from informal learning. It allows employees to learn from one another through mentoring and peer support while initially utilising the organisation's extant skills and knowledge. Moreover, informal learning enables workers to enhance their skills and knowledge in the context of new or challenging circumstances (Masanet, Guerrero-Pico and Establés, 2019). This enhances their adaptability and enables them to respond effectively to evolving business requirements. Informal learning promotes employee autonomy and self-direction as they assume responsibility for their development and learning (Janhonen, Torkkeli and Mäkelä, 2018). However, Carliner (2023) asserted that there are also certain drawbacks associated with informal learning. Informal learning cannot consistently provide accurate or high-quality information and knowledge. This can result in practices that can appear irregular or incorrect. There is a possibility of developing an unfair or restricted perspective due to the influence of the experiences and opinions of those engaged in the learning process. In addition, Faulks et al. (2021) found that informal learning can fail to receive the same level of respect or acknowledgement from the company because of its absence of structure and formal recognition compared to formal learning. Insufficient resources and assistance can be allocated to informal learning initiatives. Both formal and informal learning ultimately have benefits and drawbacks for enterprises. Formal learning provides structure, uniformity and evaluation, whereas informal learning promotes adaptability, collaboration and opportune learning. The advantages of acquiring knowledge through on-the-job training depend on the extent to which the learning
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
strategy corresponds to the overall business strategy. Companies that prioritise the compatibility of their learning programs with their business goals and values are more likely to maximise the benefits of both formal and informal learning while minimising the associated difficulties. EXPLORING UNITARIANISM AND PLURALISM MODELS IN WORKPLACE LEARNING The unitarian and pluralism model are two ways to look at the way the workplace works and the way managers and staff members communicate to each other. These models also have an effect on learning programmes at work, and the extent to which learning helps depends on the extent that the learning strategy fits with the healthcare business strategy (Kaufman et al and 2021). moreover, Van Buren's study from 2022 suggests unitarianism claims that management and workers should work together to reach a common goal. This makes the workplace more connected and united. An organisational structure and a central authority form the basis of this strategy. In this approach, management is very important. however, Johnstone's (2020) Unitarianism states that managers and workers mean the same things and that differences can be settled by working together and discussing things. This model says that learning programmes at work need to be in line with the general business strategy so that everyone operates and thinks in the same way. Pluralism, on the other hand, recognises that there are different interest groups at work, such as workers' management and unions. Pluralism states that these different interests need to be taken into account and that they should be balanced. This model says that disagreements happen in the healthcare sector, but they can be solved by talking things over and coming to an understanding. additionally,  Baker et al. (2021) additionally asserted that pluralism means that learning programmes at work should take into account everyone's distinct requirements and desires and
listen to their concerns. This means that the link between business strategies and learning strategies can be flexible enough to work with different points of view. Workplace learning is affected in different ways by these two models. The unitarian model says that there should be one leader and that everyone should share the same beliefs and goals. To help the company reach its main goals, learning programmes at work can be organised in a way that complements the company's overall strategy. It can be hard for people to come up with new ideas and grow as individuals when the focus is on togetherness and keeping things the same. however, Adam and Kriesi (2019) claim  that the plurisim  model recognises that there are many interest groups and that the different views of these groups should be taken into account. Some workplace learning programmes can need to be more flexible and open to everyone, since workers, managers, and other partners all have different wants and needs. This could be done by allowing workers choose the way they want to learn, making them help make learning programmes, and creating a space that encourages people to work together and talk to each other freely. According to Veit (2020), the benefits of learning on the job rely on the model used to see the way the learning strategy fits in with the business strategy. In the unitarian model, when the goals of the company and the interests of the employees are in line, matching the learning strategy with the business strategy can lead to more benefits. They are more likely to use the knowledge they have learned to help the company reach its goals if they can see how what they are learning fits in with those goals. Furthermore, when working for individuals from other countries, the connection between the business strategy and the learning strategy can become challenging in the healthcare industry. The goals of the company can not always be in line with the interests and concerns of the
workers. Therefore, for workplace learning projects to work, they can need an approach that is customised that takes into account the needs and opinions of everyone involved (Gagné, 2018). To accomplish this, they need to think of ways to make things work for everyone and find places where their skills and those of the company match up. Therefore, both the unitarian and pluralism models demonstrate that different things happen at work that can make it hard to teach people on the job. One authority and shared goals are important in unitarianism. It says that learning at work should go along with the company's plans. On the other hand, pluralism says that people should be able to adapt to different groups of people with different goals. In both types, there is a link between the learning strategy and the business strategy. EVIDENCE FROM THE ORGANIZATION As a medical assistant working in the healthcare field, I can say that the organization's confirmation of the important connection between the learning strategy and the business strategy is strong. Our healthcare centre encourages ongoing learning at work to make sure that all staff members, including medical assistants, know about the newest medical techniques, technologies, and best practices for taking care of patients. Formal learning methods, like workshops and training programmes, are designed to fit with the healthcare business strategy and improve results for patients and the overall efficiency of the organisation. For example, formal training sessions focus on how to use new medical technologies and stay in line with rules in the business. In addition, learning outside of education is very important in our hospital setting. The adaptive learning mindset is built on daily interactions, working together as a team, and sharing experiences. As a medical assistant, I have witnessed how informal learning can help people communicate better, work together better, and stay aware of all the different needs of patients.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The organization's goal is to provide patient-centered care and improve the total patient experience, which is in line with this informal learning strategy. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the effectiveness of workplace learning is intricately tied to the alignment between learning strategies and business strategies. This study shows the significance it is to have an integrated learning strategy that works with the general business strategy to make sure that all employees, like medical assistants, learn the information they need to know to help the company reach its goals. When it look at formal and informal learning side by side, it can see how important it is to have a balanced approach. Formal programmes offer order and consistency, while informal methods encourage flexibility and teamwork. The study of the unitarianism and pluralism models also shows the way organisational theory can affect learning projects. As a medical assistant working in the healthcare field, the organization's evidence supports the worth of customised learning programmes that deal with problems unique to the field. These programmes stress the ongoing dedication to providing excellent patient care and achieving organisational success.
References Alerasoul, S.A., Afeltra, G., Hakala, H., Minelli, E. and Strozzi, F., 2022. Organisational learning, learning organisation, and learning orientation: An integrative review and framework.   Human Resource Management Review ,   32 (3), p.100854. Antunes, H.D.J.G. and Pinheiro, P.G., 2020. Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory.   Journal of Innovation & Knowledge ,   5 (2), pp.140-149. Billett, S., 2023. Relevance of Workplace Learning in Enterprise Transformation: The Prospects for Singapore.   Singapore Labour Journal ,   2 (01), pp.6-21. Bryson, J.M., 2018.   Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement . John Wiley & Sons. Carliner, S., 2023.   Informal learning basics . Association for Talent Development. Cerasoli, C.P., Alliger, G.M., Donsbach, J.S., Mathieu, J.E., Tannenbaum, S.I. and Orvis, K.A., 2018. Antecedents and outcomes of informal learning behaviors: A meta-analysis.   Journal of Business and Psychology ,   33 , pp.203-230. Choi, K., 2021. A Study on the Architectural Planning of Formal and Informal Learning Spaces at the College of Medicine.   Journal of The Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture ,   27 (3), pp.7-16. Colognesi, S., Van Nieuwenhoven, C. and Beausaert, S., 2020. Supporting newly-qualified teachers’ professional development and perseverance in secondary education: On the role of informal learning.   European Journal of Teacher Education ,   43 (2), pp.258-276.
Faulks, B., Song, Y., Waiganjo, M., Obrenovic, B. and Godinic, D., 2021. Impact of empowering leadership, innovative work, and organizational learning readiness on sustainable economic performance: an empirical study of companies in Russia during the COVID-19 pandemic.   Sustainability ,   13 (22), p.12465 Greenhow, C. and Lewin, C., 2019. Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. In   Social media and education   (pp. 6-30). Routledge. Fleming, J. and Zegwaard, K.E., 2018. Methodologies, methods and ethical considerations for conducting research in work-integrated learning.   International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning ,   19 (3), pp.205-213. Holbeche, L., 2023.   The agile organization: how to build an engaged, innovative and resilient business . Kogan Page Publishers. Istanti, E., Sanusi, R. and Daengs, G.S., 2020. Impacts of price, promotion and go food consumer satisfaction in faculty of economic and business students of Bhayangkara University Surabaya.   Ekspektra: Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen ,   4 (02), pp.104-120. Janhonen, K., Torkkeli, K. and Mäkelä, J., 2018. Informal learning and food sense in home cooking.   Appetite ,   130 , pp.190-198. Kaukko, M. and Wilkinson, J., 2020. ‘Learning how to go on’: Refugee students and informal learning practices.   International Journal of Inclusive Education ,   24 (11), pp.1175-1193. Minton, A. and Lowe, J., 2019. How are universities supporting employers to facilitate effective “on the job” learning for apprentices?.   Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning ,   9 (2), pp.200-210.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Onyemelukwe, I.C., Ferreira, J.A.V. and Ramos, A.L., 2023. Human Energy Management in Industry: A Systematic Review of Organizational Strategies to Reinforce Workforce Energy.   Sustainability ,   15 (17), p.13202. Peters, M. and Romero, M., 2019. Lifelong learning ecologies in online higher education: Students' engagement in the continuum between formal and informal learning.   British Journal of Educational Technology ,   50 (4), pp.1729-1743. Silvestru, R.C. and Silvestru, C.I., 2019. Comparative Analysis of Policy Approaches Related to Non-Formal and Informal Learning in European Countries.   Proceedings in Manufacturing Systems ,   14 (4), pp.157-162. Sykes, H.B., 2022. Corporate venture capital: Strategies for success. In   Venture Capital   (pp. 491- 501). Routledge. Zhang, Q., Cao, M., Zhang, F., Liu, J. and Li, X., 2020. Effects of corporate social responsibility on customer satisfaction and organizational attractiveness: A signaling perspective.   Business ethics: A European review ,   29 (1), pp.20-34.