Law 2

docx

School

American National University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

523

Subject

Law

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by JudgeNightingale2436

Report
9-1. How does a contract based on common law differ from one based on the Uniform Commercial Code? Common law covers contracts that cover real property, personal property, services and employment contracts while the Uniform Commercial Code covers contracts involving the sale of goods. The requirements for offer for Common Law include subject matter, price and quantity while the price and other terms may be left open in Uniform Commercial Code. No consideration is needed for Options agreements in UCC whereas Common Law requires consideration for all option agreements. Contracts that must be in writing for Common Law include Real Estate Contracts and those contracts whose execution would take over a year, in the case of UCC, the Sale of goods over $500 with three exceptions need to be in writing. (Kubasek et al., 2016) 9-3. Describe the three requirements for a valid acceptance. A valid acceptance must meet the following requirements. i. The offeree must show an intent to enter the agreement: The offeree must show an intent to accept the offer verbally, written, or via actions as with the offeror in making the offer in order for the acceptance to be considered valid. ii. The intent needs to be communicated by the appropriate means: An acceptance may be conveyed via any reasonable means of communication. The acceptance comes into effect when the acceptance is dispatched by the offeree, however, if a specific means of communicating acceptance is stated, the offer only comes into effect after the offeror receives the acceptance if another communication means is used.
iii. The intent must satisfy the terms of the offer: The terms of the offer must be satisfied in the acceptance, a counteroffer occurs when the offeree proposes another offer which must also be accepted by the offeror. (Kubasek et al., 2016). 9-4. Describe the three requirements for a valid offer. For a legal offer to be valid, it must meet the following requirements. i. Objective intent to enter into the contract : This means that there must be a reasonably clear intent to enter a contract by the offeror. Such intent could be verbal, written, or by actions. ii. Offer must be definite: This means that the offer must refer to a subject matter, quantity, and price in the case of Common law, however, UCC makes exceptions for price and other terms which are allowed to be left open. Communication to the offeree by the offeror must be in place: This means that the offer must be communicated by the person making the offer (offeror) to the offeree (Kubasek et al., 2016).
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help