The Conflict Between Society and Individuals
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
20
Subject
Law
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
7
Uploaded by CaptainRoseStingray27
1
The Conflict between Society's and Individual’s Interests
Student Name
Institutional Affiliation
2
Introduction
The inward inconsistency between individual longings and shared objectives is a common
component of any general public. This inherent conflict habitually prompts clashes where the
interests of the individual and the greater society contrast. In our forthcoming conversation, we
will dive into the complexities encompassing the possible variations among individual and
cultural objectives. To make conceivable this assessment, we will evaluate different episodes
from the unquestionable foundation of American legislative issues and guidelines, incorporating
an alternate demonstration of various conditions including associations, affiliations, and
individual inhabitants. This article will research the huge data that can be gathered from these
cases, perceive any dependable contemplations that consolidate them, and assess the abundancy
of the U.S. Constitution in watching out for these issues. Besides, we will take part in hypothesis
with respect to the future bearing of these struggles and explore the potential factors adding to
these emerging examples.
Conflict of Interest
An association or individual is viewed as in an irreconcilable situation in occasions where
their own decisions and inclinations slow down their obligations and commitments inside their
workplace. This contention emerges when a real premium — whether cash, status, associations,
or different intangibles — is in question, and it raises doubt about their capacity to act unbiasedly
or practice fair judgment. Conflicts of interest frequently result in legal consequences. When
someone takes part in or impacts a decision based on their own inclination, it which can
occasionally be thought of as unjustifiable, degenerate, or even unlawful, these irreconcilable
situations become possibly the most important factor.
3
Conflicts between Individuals and Society
There are many examples of conflicts between society and individuals. The following are
the conflicts that may arise between individuals and society.
Gun Control
In June of 2022, a memorable decision was made by the U.S. High Court on account of
New York State Rifle and Weapon Assn., Inc. v. Bruen, which negated New York's necessity for a
genuine motivation to get a concealed carry license (LII, 2022b). This case was fixated on a
particular New York guideline that requested people to give a significant legitimization to self-
preservation while looking for a hid convey grant. The New York State Rifle and Weapon
Affiliation challenged this guideline because it disregarded the Second Amendment. Thereafter,
the essential struggle at the center of this case lies in the balance
between society's point of
lessening weapon brutality and a person's own special yearning to have firearms. Advocates for
gun control argue that serious rules are essential in keeping an eye on weapon-based violence,
while partners of gun privileges fight that such rules encroach upon their Second Amendment
opportunities. New York State Rifle and Gun Assn., Inc. v. Bruen epitomizes the persevering
pressure between individual privileges and the more extensive welfare society. The New York
guideline's fundamental objective was to determine the issue of weapon violence; however, it
additionally put objectives on the freedoms of gun owners, particularly as to prevent gun
conveyance. The High Court's ruling for this present circumstance has set off critical
conversation and been comprehensively examined as a trouble for protectors of gun control. It
stresses the intricacies of finding some kind of harmony between individual freedoms and
communal prosperity. While it is important to consider weapon viciousness avoidance, it is
additionally essential to safeguard firearm proprietors' privileges and freedoms, as articulated in
the Second Amendment of the US Constitution.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
Abortion
Roe v. Wade and Casey were overturned by the US Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson
Women's Health Organization in June 2022, giving state legislatures the power to enact abortion
restrictions once again. A Mississippi legislation that forbade abortions beyond 15 weeks of
pregnancy was at issue in the case; the only exceptions were for serious fetal defects or medical
emergencies (LII, 2022a). The Jackson Women's Health Organization, Mississippi's sole abortion
facility, contested the law. The interests of society in defending the rights of the unborn child and
those of individuals who wish to have control over their own bodies are at odds in this situation.
Advocates for life contend that abortion is murder and that the state must uphold the rights of the
unborn child. Women reserve the option to make a choice on what takes place their bodies, as
indicated by pro-choice proponents, and the government should not stomp all over that right. The
contention between an individual's rights and the bigger benefit of society is best shown by the
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case. The Mississippi regulation, which likewise
confined ladies' independence over their own bodies, was laid out determined to safeguard the
privileges of the unborn child. Many individuals have reprimanded the High Court's choice for
this situation as a problem for the opportunity of regenerative decision and women's freedoms.
COVID-19 Vaccines
An appropriate example with regards to Coronavirus immunizations in the US is a current
legal dispute Cruz v. Zucker. A New York state regulation necessitated that medical care
employees for this situation get the Coronavirus immunization (Williams et al., 2023). Various
clinical specialists sued, contending that this commitment encroached on their sacred freedoms.
The contention between society's longing to end the Coronavirus flare-up and the freedoms of
individuals who have hesitations about becoming immunized is the primary issue. While the
Coronavirus pandemic was being contained, the New York state regulation likewise had the
5
dumbfounding impact of limiting the power of medical care experts when it came to choices
involving their own bodies. The Cruz v. Zucker case is a convincing representation of the clear
strain between an individual's rights and the interests of society in general (Justia Law, 2015).
Remarkably, while being tested on constitutional grounds, the New York state order in the long
run endured court examination. The court, in its knowledge, kept up with the requirement,
concluding that the state was able to order COVID-19 vaccinations for healthcare workers
considering a real concern for public prosperity.
Principle that Unites these Conflicts
The overall idea of finding some kind of harmony between individual freedoms and the
interests of society in general is the primary reason for the contentions among society and people
that are the focal point of the previously mentioned cases. The U.S. Constitution, which protects
several individual rights like the freedom of expression and the choice to keep and own firearms,
is the foundation of this delicate balance (National Archives, 2023). In any case, it is crucial to
grasp that these opportunities are not unassailable and could be feeble to limits assuming they
conflict with the greater cultural interest. For instance, the unhindered ability to yell "fire" in a
stuffed theater, risking public prosperity, doesn't fall inside the Subsequent Change's importance
of the opportunity of articulation wrongly. The Second Amendment's disallowance on the
responsibility for such significantly dangerous weapons, as nuclear weapons, reaches out to one
side of the battle in a similar way.
US Constitution Guide Toward a Resolution of Conflicts
A fundamental framework for keeping an eye out for inconsistencies that could arise
between society's tendencies and those of unequivocal people is given by the US Constitution.
While reaffirming a few focal common open doors, it likewise noticed that these valuable open
doors have constraints, especially when they battle with the interests of society. The Constitution
6
spread out a strategy for controlling decisions that defeats against the blend of unnecessary power
in any one government arm and maintains a decent overall equilibrium (Ben's Guide, n.d.).
Regardless, it's crucial to fathom that the Constitution is a living text that has shifted over the
course of time due to understanding and changes.
Future of Conflicts between Society and Individuals
It appears to be reasonable that the continuous strains between cultural goals and
individual interests will persevere for years to come. As society creates and turns out to be more
convoluted, almost certainly, more circumstances will emerge with the possibility to start such
conflicts. In any case, it is vital to perceive that the US Constitution gives a system to settling
these struggles. The Constitution's arrangement of governing rules is fundamental in keeping any
one arm of the government from gaining unnecessary power and helping with the settlement of
these contentions. Eventually, it depends on both individuals and society to implement ways to
track down useful solutions for these enduring issues.
Conclusion
In any society, conflicts between the aggregate interests of the community and the
freedoms of individuals are a deep-rooted part of its issues. The previously mentioned
occurrences highlight the inborn strain between shielding individual freedoms and propelling the
more extensive societal welfare. While the U.S. Constitution lays the basis for addressing and
alleviating these conflicts, the onus falls upon people and the aggregate society to cooperatively
seek solutions. As our general public turns out to be progressively mind boggling and complex, it
makes sense that the pervasiveness of these conflicts setting cultural interests in opposition to
individual freedoms will continue. In any case, through a coordinated work to balance individual
opportunities with the long term benefit of society, we can fashion arrangements that advance
balance and solidarity.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
7
References
Albrecht, D. E. (2022). Vaccination, politics and COVID-19 impacts.
BMC Public Health
,
22
(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12432-x
Ben’s Guide. (n.d.).
Checks and balances
. Retrieved October 20, 2023, from
https://bensguide.gpo.gov/j-check-balance
Justia Law. (2015, July 29).
Cruz et al v. Zucker, No. 1:2014cv04456 - Document 52 (S.D.N.Y.
2015)
. Retrieved October 20, 2023, from https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-
courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2014cv04456/428588/52/
LII. (2022a, June).
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022)
. Legal Information
Institute. Retrieved October 20, 2023, from
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/dobbs_v._jackson_women%27s_health_organization_
%282022%29
LII. (2022b, June).
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association (NYSRPA) v. Bruen (2022)
. Legal
Information Institute. Retrieved October 20, 2023, from
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/new_york_state_rifle_pistol_association_(nysrpa)_v._bru
en_(2022)
National Archives. (2023, April 27).
The Bill of Rights: What Does it Say?
Retrieved October 20,
2023, from https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights/what-does-it-say
Williams, S., Armitage, C. J., Dienes, K., Drury, J., & Tampe, T. (2023). Public decisions about
COVID-19 vaccines: A UK-based qualitative study.
PLOS ONE
,
18
(3), e0277360.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277360