cwollenzien_strategicplan_01282024

docx

School

Rasmussen College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

4461

Subject

Information Systems

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by cwoll1979

Report
Strategic Plan Cynthia Wollenzien Christopher Burke CCJ4461: Evidence-Based Practices in C.J. January 28, 2024
Strategic Plan The plan to address the struggling recidivism statistics is divided into several stages. These stages must be implemented in the given order to guarantee the improvement of the situation. Stage 1 . Data integration. It is essential to establish a specialized and centralized data system. This system will integrate data from COMPAS risk assessment and COMPSTAT crime data as the individual offender's profiles. This integration is essential to cross-reference between offenders and factors contributing to recidivism. Stage 2. Start a multidisciplinary collaboration. Establish an interdisciplinary task force with representatives from the correctional agency, law enforcement, mental health experts, and vocational training experts. This will promote a holistic approach to tackling the problem. Stage 3. Conduct a COMPAS risk assessment. Set up a dynamic risk management system to continuously evaluate the changing risk levels (Jackson & Mendoza, 2020). Stage 4. COMPSTAT-based interventions. These are important to analyze the crime hotspots and areas with high recidivism rates. The interventions will be focused on prevention and rehabilitation (Goff & Buchanan, 2020). Stage 5. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) integration within correctional facilities ( Barnes et al., 2017) . This will help with the distorted thinking patterns and negative behavior identified by COMPAS. CBT can be tailored to specific criminogenic needs and factors that impact the recidivism rate. Stage 6. Set up vocational training. Such programs must be aligned with offenders' needs (Duwe & Henry-Nickie, 2021). This will help with real work experience.
Stage 7. Individualized rehabilitation plan. COMPAS assessment with CBT interventions and vocational training vector will be aligned with the offender's preferences, addressing the criminogenic needs and various risk factors. Stage 8. Community engagement. The involvement of local communities will be beneficial to the rehabilitation process. Based on the implemented vocational training, business partnerships will provide opportunities for post-release offenders, helping them reintegrate into the community. Stage 9. Continuous monitoring. COMPSTAT data, CBT outcomes, and continuous COMPAS risk assessment will help adequately evaluate the situation. Stage 10. Continuous education and increase of power awareness of the problem Conclusion The integration of COMPSTAT, COMPAS, CBT, and vocational training will decrease recidivism levels, helping post-release offenders better integrate into society and have jobs via the business partnership programs between correctional agencies and local businesses.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
References Barnes, G. C., Hyatt, J. M., & Sherman, L. W. (2017). Even a little bit helps. Implementation and experimental evaluation of cognitive-behavioral therapy for high-risk probationers.   Criminal Justice and Behaviour ,   44 (4), 611–630. Duwe, G., & Henry-Nickie, M. (2021). Training and employment for correctional populations.   Contexts ,   20 (4), 40-45. Goff, P. A., & Buchanan, K. S. (2020). A data-driven remedy for racial disparities: COMPSTAT for justice.   NYU Ann. Surv. Am. L. ,   76 , 375. Jackson, E., & Mendoza, C. (2020). Setting the record straight: what the COMPAS core risk and need assessment is and is not.   Harvard Data Science Review ,   2 (1).