Evaluation design is crucial for program evaluation as it provides a framework for collecting and analyzing data to assess the effectiveness and impact of a program. The design determines the methods,
tools, and techniques used to gather information, measure outcomes, and make evidence-based decisions. A well-crafted evaluation design ensures that the evaluation process is systematic, reliable, and valid, leading to accurate findings and actionable recommendations for program improvement. This evaluation will look at the data collected to see if the program is successful or a failure. Then after the evaluation the information will be shared with the appropriate shareholders so that they can use the data to modify the program as needed.
In the criminal justice sector, a mixed method approach is often considered more effective for evaluations. This approach combines quantitative and qualitative methods to provide a comprehensive understanding of complex issues within the criminal justice system. Quantitative methods allow for the measurement of specific outcomes and the analysis of numerical data, such as recidivism rates or crime statistics. On the other hand, qualitative methods, such as interviews and observations, allow for the exploration of the lived experiences, perceptions, and motivations of individuals involved in the criminal justice system. By integrating both approaches, a mixed method evaluation can offer a more holistic and
nuanced understanding of the effectiveness and impact of criminal justice programs and interventions.
References:
Mertens,D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2019). Program evaluation theory and practice, Second edition: A comprehensive guide (Second). Guilford Publications.
2. Vito, G. F. & Higgins, G. E. (2015). Practical Program Evaluation for Criminal Justice. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. London and New York.
