HI253 Unit 6 Assignment
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Ivy Tech Community College, Indianapolis *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
85B
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by sleejones81
HI253 Medical Coding I
Unit 6 Assignment Instructions Unit outcomes addressed in this Assignment:
➢
Compare the key features of electronic health record (EHR) systems in relation to clinical documentation standards and the role of coding.
➢
Assess the use of health information systems in the practice of coding.
Course outcomes addressed in this Assignment:
GEL-1.02
: Demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original
materials in Standard English.
HI253-4
: Compare the features of health information systems used for quality coding practices.
AHIMA’s Professional Coding Approved Program (PCAP) Mapping:
I. Data Structure, Content and Information Governance
●
I.4. Determine compliance of health record content within the health organization. (Bloom’s level 5)
EHR and Coding Resources Comparison: Situation: You are the coding supervisor at a major acute care hospital. The hospital administration has been studying payment and outcome metrics for the institution and realizes that the current electronic health records system may be outdated. You have been asked to create a report that answers the following question: “What EHR and coding resources would you recommend to the hospital administration to ensure that the most current ICD-10-CM/PCS codes are in use in your healthcare facility?”
Your report should compare at least 3 EHR systems that you have been exposed to in this course (for example Nuance Clintegrity, 3M Encoder, Meditech
) or worked with in the past. Your comparison should include features such as coding resources, advantages/disadvantages, and computer system requirements for each system. Your report should include your final recommendation out of the three systems you review and the rationale for your decision. Your comparison report should be well-ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful. Your report should include a comparison table that summarizes your findings. It is not necessary to follow paragraph style in the comparison table.
Submission requirements
:
Your report should be 1 to 2 pages in length, not including the title or reference page. It should be written in paragraph style using Standard English (proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling). Your report should follow 7
th
edition APA formatting and citation style: 1-inch margins, double-spaced, and include a title page and reference page. Remember to list any references in
APA format. At a minimum, there should be one reference for each system discussed. You may find help on APA referencing either via the APA Style Central available In Academic Tools or by accessing the Academic Support Center's APA resource page at https://campus.purdueglobal.edu/MyStudies/AcademicSupportCenter/WritingCenter/
WritingReferenceLibrary/ResearchCitationAndPlagiarism/CommonCitationsInAPAformat.aspx
.
Example Comparison Table
: You may adjust this table or create your own table comparing the features of at least 3 health information systems and their advantages/disadvantages in coding. Support your information with examples.
System Name
Attribute/ Attribute/ Attribute/ Attribute/
2302B
HI253 Unit 6 Assignment
1
HI253 Medical Coding I
Resource #1
Resource #2
Resource #3
Resource #4
EPIC
Easy to keep in touch with patients
Easy access for outside providers to review records and lab
Direct patient to physician contact through easy messaging
User friendly
iSalus
Easy to navigate. Simple layout
User friendly
Easy to fax in
system and check status of faxing
Find A Code
Simple layout
User friendly
Submitting your work:
Save your report as a single Word .DOCX file (that includes a title page, the report with comparison table, and reference page), including your name in the document title, and submit it to the Unit 6 Assignment dropbox.
HI253: Unit 6 Assignment Rubric:
Criteria
Level III
Level II
Level I
Not Present
Criterion 1
Level III Max Points
Points: 15
Level II Max Points
Points: 12
Level I Max Points
Points: 9
Not Present
0 points
Student compares at least 3 EHR systems
Comparison of at least 3 EHR systems includes at least 4 criteria such as: coding resources, advantages, disadvantages, and computer system requirements.
Comparison of at least 2 EHR systems includes at least 3 criteria such as: coding resources, advantages, disadvantages, and computer system requirements.
Discussion of only
1 EHR system includes at least 2
criteria such as:
coding resources,
advantages, disadvantages, and computer system requirements
No EHR system is discussed.
Criterion 2
Level III Max Points
Points: 12
Level II Max Points
Points: 9
Level I Max Points
Points: 6
Not Present
0 points
Comparison table summarizes findings
Table is included that compares the criteria of the systems reviewed. Information is supported with examples.
Table is included that compares the
criteria of the systems reviewed. Information is not supported with examples.
Table is included that does not compare the criteria of the systems reviewed. Information is not supported with examples
No comparison table is included.
Criterion 3
Level III Max Points
Points: 3
Level II Max Points
Points: 2
Level I Max Points
Points: 1
Not Present
0 points
Submission
Submission is well
Submission is
Submission is not
Submission is 2302B
HI253 Unit 6 Assignment
2
HI253 Medical Coding I
is well ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and insightful, follows APA style, and is 1-2 pages in length.
ordered, logical and
unified, as well as original and insightful. There is a
strong attempt to cite all sources using APA style. Minor paper formatting errors such as a misplaced running head or margins may occur. Minor in-text citation errors such as a missing page number or a misplaced date may
occur. Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear. Submission is
1-2 pages in length,
not including the title and reference pages.
well ordered, logical and unified, as well as
original and insightful. There is an overall attempt at APA formatting and citation style. All sources appear to
have some form of citation both in the text and on a reference list. There are some formatting and citation errors. Citations generally make authorship clear. Submission is 1-2
pages in length, not including the title and reference
pages.
well ordered, logical, unified, or original and insightful. There is an attempt to use APA formatting and citing. There are both in-text citations and reference listings.
Citation information may be missing or incorrect (i.e. Websites listed as
in-text or reference citations). There is an attempt to cite all outside sources in at least
one place. Authorship is generally clear. Submission is not
1-2 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages
not well ordered, logical, unified, or original and insightful. There is some attempt at APA
formatting and citing. There are one or more missing parts such as the cover page or references list. Citation information may be missing. Citation mistakes make authorship unclear. Submission is not 1-2 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages
Maximum Total Points
30
23
16
0
Minimum Total Points
24
17
1
0
2302B
HI253 Unit 6 Assignment
3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help