11-13-23, 10:17 AM Microsoft Lens(1)
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Illinois, Chicago *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
201
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
Pages
3
Uploaded by SuperStar4480
Review:
Chapter
5,
6
and
7
5.
Annual
Worth
and
Future
Worth
6.
Rate
of
Return
7.
Replacement
Analysis
5.1
Annual
Worth
5.2
Future
Worth
6.1
Internal
Rate
of
Return
Calculations
6.2
External
Rate
of
Return
Calculations
7.1:
Cash Flow
and
Opportunity
Cost
Approaches
to
Replacement
Analysis
7.2:
Optimum
Replacement
Interval
«
Potential
questions
in
exam:
concept
questions
(T/F),
short
calculations,
long
calculations
Example
1
A
company
is
considering
outsourcing
its
call
center
operations
to
a
third-party
contractor
instead
of
operating
its
own,
as
it
currently
does.
It
would
cost
the
third-party
contractor
$800,000
to
set
up
the
call
center.
It
would
cost
$250,000
per
year
to
operate
the
outsourced
call
center,
but
it
would
save
the
company
$400,000
in
labor
costs
per
year.
The
call
center
will
be
operated
for
8
years,
and
the
company
anticipates
a
salvage
value
of
$25,000
when
it
sells
the
furniture
and
equipment
used
at
the
end
of
the
outsourced
call
center's
operations.
Compute
the
annual
worth
of
the
outsourced
call
center,
and
state
whether
or
not
the
company
should
outsource
its
call
center
operations
to
a
third-party
contractor
assuming
its
MARR
is
8%.
-
Given:
P=-$800,000,
A=$150,000,
F=$25,000,
MARR=8%,
n=8
Find:
AW
Using
factor
notation,
we
know
AW(8%
)
=
—
$800,000(A|P
8
%,
8)
+
$150,000
+
$25,000(A|F
8
%
,
8)
AW(8%
)
=
—
$800,000(0.17401)
+
$150.000
+
$25,000(0.09401)
=
$13,142.25
Since
AW(8%)
>
O,
the
company
should
outsource
its
call
center
operations.
Example
2
A
hospital
is
considering
purchasing
a
new
medical
dispensing
cabinet
that
will
cost
$200,000.
It
believes
that
this
cabinet
will
reduce
the
amount
of
labor
required
to
track
and
administer
medications
and
will
also
result
in
fewer
expired
medicines.
It
estimates
¥
¥
T
T
end
Example
2
A
hospital
is
considering
purchasing
a
new
medical
dispensing
cabinet
that
will
cost
$200,000.
It
believes
that
this
cabinet
will
reduce
the
amount
of
labor
required
to
track
and
administer
medications
and
will
also
result
in
fewer
expired
medicines.
It
estimates
the
medical
dispensing
cabinet
will
result
in
a
savings
of
$30,000
at
the
end
of
year
one
and
that
the
savings
will
increase
by
$5,000
per
year
for
each
of
the
7
years
that
the
machine
will
be
used.
What
is
the IRR
of
this
investment?
If
the
hospital's
MARR
is
12%,
should
they
invest
in
this
cabinet?
-
Given:
Composite
series
with,
P=-$200,000,
A=$30,000,
G=$5,000,
MARR=12%,
n=7
Find:
Using
the
factor
tables,
PW
(i)
=
-
$200,000
+
$30,000(P|A
i*,7)
+
$5000(P|G
i*,7)
=
0
‘We can
therefore
infer
that
11%
<
i*
<
12%.
We
will
need
to
try
various
values
of
i
to
determine
the
value
of
i
so
PW(i)
=0.
We
could
use
linear
interpolation
to
Ifi
=
11%,
we
obtain
approximate
the
value
of
i*,
or
if
we
had
PW
(1%
)
=
—
5200000
+
$30,000(4.71220)
+
$5000(12.18716)
=
$2.301.50
~
additional
tables
(e.g.,
i
=
11.1%,
11.2%,
etc.)
If
i
=
12%,
we
obtain
we
could
more
closely
estimate
the
value
of
o
i*.
When
we
interpolate,
we
obtain
a
value
of
PW
(12%
)
=
—
$200,000
+
$30,000(4.56376)
+
$5.000(11.64427)
=
—
$4,865.85
|94
306
A
company
is
trying
to
decide
whether
it
should
upgrade
a
machine
it
has
or
purchase
a
newer
version
of
the
machine.
It
will
need
to
use the
machine
for
the
next
6
years.
If
it
upgrades
the
machine,
it
already
owns,
this
would
cost
$40,000;
the
machine
it
owns would
cost
$10,000
per
year
to
operate
and
maintain.
At
the
end
of
6
years,
the
machine
would
have
a
salvage
value
of
$2,000.
Alternatively,
it
could
trade
in
the
machine
it
owns
for
$20,000
and
purchase
a
new
machine
for
$90,000.
The
new
machine
would
cost
$2,000
per
year
to
operate
and maintain.
At
the
end
of
6
years,
the
machine
would
have
a
salvage
value
of
$15,000.
Assuming
the
company
has
a
MARR
of
10%,
compute
the
EUAC
of
both
the
upgraded
and
new
machine
using
the
insider
perspective.
Which
alternative
would
you
recommend?
EQY
CF(rebuild)
CF(new)
Given:
Cash
flows
shown
in
the
table
below,
n=6,
MARR=10%
:
.
-$90,000
+
Find:
EUAC
for
each
alternative
0
-$40,000
$20,000
If
the
company
upgrades
its
machine,
the
EUAC
would
be:
EUAC(rebuild)
=
$40,000(A|P
10
%
,
6)
+
$10,000
—
$2,000(A|F
10
%
.
6)
15
-$10,000
-$2,000
EUAC(rebuild)
=
$40,000(0.22961)
+
$10,000
—
$2,000(0.12961)
=
$18,925
$10,000+
-$2.000+
”
X
{
If
the
company
buys
a
new
machine,
the
EUAC
would
be:
$2,000
$15,000
EUAC(new)
=
$70.000(A|P
10
%
.
6)
+
$2,000
—
$15,000(A|F
10
%
,
6)
EUAC(new)
=
$70,000(0.22961)
+
$2,000
—
$15,000(0.12961)
=
$16,129
Since
EUAC(new)
<
EUAC(rebuild),
the
company
should
purchase
a
new
machine.
If
the
company
upgrades
its
machine,
the
EUAC
would
be:
EUAC((rebuild)
=
$40,000(A|P
10
%
,
6)
+
$10,000
—
$2000(A|F
10
%
.6)
15
-$10,000
-$2,000
EUAC(rebuild)
=
$40,000(0.22961)
+
$10,000
—
$2,000(0.12961)
=
$18,925
If
the
company
buys
a
new
machine,
the
EUAC
would
be:
EUAC(new)
=
$70.000(A|
P
10
%
,
6)
+
$2,000
—
$15,000(A|
F
10
%
.
6)
EUAC(new)
=
$70,000(0.22961)
+
$2,000
—
$15,000(0.12961)
=
$16.129
Since
EUAC(new)
<
EUAC(rebuild),
the
company
should
purchase
a
new
machine.
Example
4
The
Petersik
family
is
considering
purchasing
a
second
home
to
use
for
short
term
rentals
near
the
beach.
If
it
purchases
the
house,
they
will
place
a
down
payment
of
$50,000
on
the
house.
They
estimate
they
will
get
an
annual
net
rental
profit
of
$8,000
after
their
mortgage
and
expenses
are
paid.
After
15
years,
they
plan
to
pass
the rental
home
along
to
their
children,
so
assume
the
home
has
negligible
salvage
value.
What
would
be
the
ERR
if
the
Petersik
family
decides
to
invest
in
a
rental
home,
assuming
they
keep
the
home
for
15
years?
Assuming
their
MARR
is
10%,
should
they
invest
in
this
rental
home?
-
Given:
Revenues:
Uniform
series
A=$8,000,
=15,
MARR=10%
;
Costs:
P=-$50,000
Find:
i
We
need
to
compute
the
FW
of
both
the
revenues
and
costs.
Using
factor
notation.
we
know
$8,000(F|A
10
%,
15)
=
$50,000(F
|P
i,
15)
i:g,um"
':ic,uv.')"
4
=
=
$8.000(31.77248)
=
$50,000(F
|
P
i/,
15)
utureworthof
positive:
S
e
i
hesre
When
we
solve
and
rearrange
terms,
we
find
valied
cashflows
thatare
=
worth
of
negative-valued
"
reinvested
at
the
MARR
cash
flows
with rate
of
ERR
(F|P
i.15)
=
5.08360
Looking
on
the
tables,
we
can see
that
this
occurs
when
11%
<
{
<
12%.
We
could
interpolate
to
find
a
closer
approximation
of
i.
Which
gives
us
i
=
11.449%.
Since
this
is
greater
than
the
Petersik's
MARR
of
10%,
they
should
invest
in
the
rental
home.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help