Practice Problem 4
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
SUNY Buffalo State College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
509LEC
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
10
Uploaded by ProfGorilla13929
Practice Exam 4
Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo
IE 509 | Fall 2023
Six Sigma Quality
Dr. Cecilia Martinez Leon, Ph.D. Sc.D., MBB
Due Date: November 12, 2023
Name: Shihan Reza
Q1. I did a cube plot Geometric representation of this experiment. Performing, Factorial Regression: Dryability versus drying agent, Temperature
From the Coded coefficient table, I can see the effect of Drying Agent, temperature and the combination of both. By changing Drying Agent, I got the highest effect on the Dryability. After that temperature which is less than half of the effect of drying agent. The p-values for the main effects of drying agent, temperature and drying agent and temperature are less than 0.05, indicating that all factors have a significant effect on Dryability.
So, from the Pareto chart I can tell the impact of Drying Agent is statistically significant than temperature. So, his hypothesis is correct when he said “that a high level of drying agent will result in high Dryability, high temperature – alone – will result in a moderately high level of Dryability, and low temperature or a low level of drying agent will result in a low level of Dryability.”
the model that we have created with these two factors and the interaction, captures the overall variability observed in the data. R sq is high so it’s telling so they are creating high impact.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
From the normal plot we can tell Factor A (drying Agent) B (temperature) and Ab all of them are
significant
Q2. Factorial Regression: Toll Life versus A, B, C. cutting speed (A), metal hardness (B), and cutting angle (C) as the factors.
o
Do any of the three factors affect tool life?
metal hardness (B), and cutting angle (C) significant individual factors
.
we have a significant
interaction effect between A and C (cutting speed and cutting angle), so the answer is 'yes', tool life is affected by some or all of these factors.
o
What combination of factor levels produces the most extended tool life?
Look at the run totals: BC gives the best performance. that is use high levels for metal hardness and cutting angle and low level for cutting speed.
o
Is there a combination of cutting speed and cutting angle that always gives good results regardless of the metal hardness?
Because there is a significant interaction between A and C, you cannot just increase A or C. In fact, the best performance will occur when A is set low and C is set high. This gives reasonable performance when B is low and very good performance when B is high.
o
Draw conclusions:
Individually metal hardness (B), and cutting angle (C) significant and we have a significant interaction effect between A and C (cutting speed and cutting angle. So, the best performance will occur when A is set low and C is set high
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Q3.
# Show the design with a cube plot.
# Identify the significant factors and interactions (if any):
From the coded Coefficient and pareto chart I can tell B: Account-opening fee; D: Long-term Interest Rate and A: Annual Fee are the significant factor Coded Coefficients
Term
Effect
Coef
SE
Coef
T-
Value
P-
Value
VIF
Constant 177.3
*
*
* A
30.37
15.19
*
*
* 1.00
B
-38.88
-19.44
*
*
* 1.00
C
18.875
9.438
*
*
* 1.00
D
-37.37
-18.69
*
*
* 1.00
A*B
-22.63
-11.31
*
*
* 1.00
A*C
0.12500 0.06250
*
*
* 1.00
A*D
-8.125
-4.062
*
*
* 1.00
B*C
-3.625
-1.812
*
*
* 1.00
B*D
7.625
3.813
*
*
* 1.00
C*D
11.875
5.937
*
*
* 1.00
A*B*C
-3.875
-1.937
*
*
* 1.00
A*B*D
6.375
3.188
*
*
* 1.00
A*C*D
0.6250
0.3125
*
*
* 1.00
B*C*D
-8.125
-4.063
*
*
* 1.00
A*B*C*
D
-3.875
-1.938
*
*
* 1.00
# You may want to refer to the ANOVA table or the appropriate graph to facilitate the interpretation.
Analysis of Variance
Source
D
F
Adj
SS
Adj
MS
F-
Valu
e
P-
Valu
e
Annual fee
1 3691 3690.
6
10.9
4
0.00
7
Account openning fee
1 6045 6045.
1
17.9
3
0.00
1
Initial Interest Rate
1 1425 1425.
1
4.23
0.06
4
Long term
interest rate
1 5588 5587.
6
16.5
7
0.00
2
Error
1
1
3709 337.2 Total
1
5
2045
7
Annual fee and Account opening fee and Long term interest rate has effect as p value is low.
Create the main effects plot and the full interaction matrix to understand the impact of these factors on the response variable.
Identify the optimum conditions to attract more customers
As Annual fee and Account opening fee and long-term interest rate has effect as p value is low. So we can lower it down and change this number.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Lastly, conduct the residuals analysis to validate the ANOVA assumptions. Please comment and give insights.
Since the P value is high .529, so we need better statistics to get the P value lower than .5