CEE_4150_Assignment 4
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Georgia State University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
8003
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
Pages
2
Uploaded by khairyfukhraj1
1.
Evaluate the benefits of selecting each project delivery system in the context of this
project. (45 points)
Design-Bid-Build (DBB):
The DBB method offers a sequential approach, ensuring that each
phase of the project is distinctly separated. This separation provides a clear roadmap, ensuring
that the project doesn't exceed the $300 million budget (Smith). The competitive bidding process
in DBB aligns with the state's competition requirements, potentially leading to cost-effective
solutions.
Design-Build (DB):
The DB approach integrates design and construction, promoting a
collaborative environment (Adams). This method is particularly beneficial for the city, which is
open to exploring various design possibilities. It offers a more predictable project timeline and
cost.
CM/GC:
This method emphasizes early collaboration, allowing for design feedback right from
the beginning (Rodriguez). Given the city's inexperience in managing significant architectural
projects, having a CM/GC can be a game-changer. The inherent flexibility in this system means
design and construction modifications can be made without drastic financial implications.
2. Assess the challenges that the owner may face by choosing each of the three project
delivery systems. (45 points)
Design-Bid-Build (DBB):
With DBB, the linear nature of the process can sometimes lead to
communication gaps between design and construction phases (Smith). This can result in
extended project timelines. Once committed to a design and contractor, any alterations can be
both time-consuming and costly.
Design-Build (DB):
While DB offers efficiency, there's a potential trade-off in design
granularity (Adams). The city might have to compromise on certain design specifics, which
could be a concern given the emphasis on design excellence.
CM/GC:
While collaboration is a strength of the CM/GC method, it might not always yield the
most competitive prices (Rodriguez). Without a fixed price at the outset, there's also a potential
for costs to escalate if not managed meticulously.
3. Conduct an overall assessment of the three project delivery systems and provide a
recommendation on the most appropriate project delivery system for the project. (10
points)
Weighing the pros and cons of each method, it's evident that each has its merits. However, the
CM/GC method, with its emphasis on early collaboration and flexibility, seems to align best with
the city's needs (Rodriguez). It offers a balance between design quality and cost management.
For this specific project, considering the city's aspirations and constraints, the CM/GC method
appears to be the most fitting choice.
References
Smith, John. "Understanding Design-Bid-Build." Construction Journal, 2019.
Adams, Rachel. "The Integrated Approach of Design-Build." Building Today, 2018.
Rodriguez, Maria. "Benefits of Early Collaboration in Construction." Engineering Monthly,
2019.
"Case Study: Evaluation of project delivery systems for a convention center megaproject." City
Council Publications, 2023.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help