Module 7 short responses-Joshua__Taylor_HIS_200__Applied_History-4-16-23-Completed

docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

200

Subject

History

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by PrivateOctopus1521

Report
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 1 Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Be sure to respond to this question in no more than one sentence, using proper grammar. The three historical lense you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between the natives and the white settlers would be the economic, political, and social/cultural lenses. The economic lens should be used due to the acquisition of land to build to Trans-Alaskan pipeline was the greatest economic endeavor in U.S. history. The political lens should be used due to the ongoing conflict between the Natives and the American government. The social lens should be utilized due to the fact that we are looking at a historical event involving America's Aboriginal people. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 2 Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be longer than one sentence. During the 19th century, conflicts arose between the Natives and the white settlers. This can be attributed to one cause alone, disputes over land. Native Americans were forced to give up their lands to white settlers who were moving westward in search of new land and opportunities. This led to a series of conflicts between the two groups as they fought over land ownership and control. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 3 Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw. Three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video regarding the first Thanksgiving feast in 1621 would be the social lens, the religous lens, and the economic lens. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 4 Massasoit's decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one or two.)
Massasoit's decision to approach the Pilgrims revolved around events like the Patuxet, which had been devastated by disease in addition to being threatened by the Narragansett people, rival tribes. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 5 Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims. One short-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims would be the binding contract between the two parties referred to as a "mutual defense alliance" to combat their common enemies. One long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims would be the strained relations between the parties. After so many Englishmen joined the fray, the power shifted in favor of the English. This proved to be disastrous for the Native's hundreds of natives were killed and hundreds more were taken captive and sold into slavery. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 6 How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it. My understanding of the historical event in my essay has changed as a result of my research dramatically. I was able to go back and apply different lenses to my event to better understand how the events tied together to give me the bigger picture. There really wasn't a time I was confused or had any misconceptions. However, one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea I had about My topic has since been corrected after researching and writing about it would be that all Alaskan natives would be covered under the Land claims act but that is not the case. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 7 Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee Removal. Specify one aspect of this event for each lens that you cite. Four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee Removal would be the economic, political, military, and social lenses. The economic lens would analyze the financial aspects of the Cherokee Removal. The political lens would analyze how political decisions were made regarding the removal of the Cherokee people from their land. The military lens would analyze how military force was used to remove the Cherokee people from their land. Finally, The social lens would analyze how the removal of the Cherokee
people from their land affected their social structure and way of life. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 8 Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: "The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it." Cite at least three historical facts that support your position. I agree that the Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it. It is considered invalid because first and foremost "The National Cherokee Council claimed the treaty was invalid because the Principal Chief did not sign it and the Cherokee that did were not authorized to." (Records of Rights, n.d.) Secondly, "A majority of the Cherokee Nation argued that the Treaty of New Echota was invalid as the United States signed the treaty with a minority party that was not recognized as the leaders and voice of the Cherokee people." (Zotigh, 2019) Finally, The National Cherokee Council claimed that the treaty was invalid because the Principal Chief did not sign it and the Cherokee that did were not authorized to. References: Zogigh, D. (2019) The Treaty That Forced the Cherokee People from Their Homelands Goes on View Smithsonian The Treaty That Forced the Cherokee People from Their Homelands Goes on View | Smithsonian Voices | National Museum of the American Indian Smithsonian Magazine Records of Rights (n.d) Petition Against Treaty of New Echota National Archives Petition Against the Treaty of New Echota, 1836 | Records of Rights
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help