The Influenza Pandemic of 1918-19
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Salt Lake Community College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1700
Subject
History
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by BaronUniverse13353
Name: Simale Ambo
Date: 11/5/2023
Class: History 1700
Assignment: Search for Primary and Secondary Sources
The Influenza Pandemic of 1918-19
Primary Sources
1.
“The Pandemic Of Influenza, 1918-19.” The British Medical Journal 1, no. 3140 (1921):
355–56. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20426781.
2.
CARNWATH, T. “LESSONS OF THE INFLUENZA EPIDEMIC 1918.” The Journal of
State Medicine (1912-1937) 27, no. 5 (1919): 142–57.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/45206523.
3.
Mullen, Pierce C., and Michael L. Nelson. “Montanans and ‘The Most Peculiar Disease’:
The Influenza Epidemic and Public Health, 1918-1919.” Montana: The Magazine of
Western History 37, no. 2 (1987): 50–61. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4519050.
4.
Ghendon, Youri. “Introduction to Pandemic Influenza through History.” European
Journal of Epidemiology 10, no. 4 (1994): 451–53.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3520976
.
5.
Fargey, Kathleen M. “THE DEADLIEST ENEMY: The U.S. Army and Influenza, 1918–
1919.” Army History, no. 111 (2019): 24–39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26616953.
6.
Tomkins, Sandra M. “The Influenza Epidemic of 1918-19 in Western Samoa.” The
Journal of Pacific History 27, no. 2 (1992): 181–97.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/25169127.
Secondary Sources
1.
Coombs, Howard G. “The Influenza Pandemic of 1918: Military Observations for
Today.” Edited by Thierry Tardy. COVID-19: NATO in the Age of Pandemics. NATO
Defense College, 2020.
2.
Tucker, Neely. “‘The Great Influenza’ - Library Resources on the 1918 to 1919
Pandemic: Timeless.” The Library of Congress, April 7, 2020.
Question Two: Read Two of your Primary Sources. Use the primary source analysis skills you
gained during the first half of the semester to analyze the primary sources.
“The Pandemic Of Influenza, 1918-19.” The British Medical Journal 1, no. 3140 (1921): 355–56.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/20426781.
This primary source highlights the multifaceted nature of the 1918-19 influenza
pandemic. It emphasizes that the Ministry of Health’s responsibilities extend beyond legislation,
highlighting the need for a “review of administrative effort in the light of increasing knowledge,
and the collection and dissemination of information, especially about epidemics” (The Pandemic
Of Influenza, The British Medical Journal). The document highlights the different reports that
were out at the time, it applauds its comprehensive study of the historical epidermis, particularly
its focus on epidemiology and clinical findings of interest to medical practitioners.
Mullen, Pierce C., and Michael L. Nelson. “Montanans and ‘The Most Peculiar Disease’: The
Influenza Epidemic and Public Health, 1918-1919.” Montana: The Magazine of Western History
37, no. 2 (1987): 50–61. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4519050.
This primary source highlights the devastating impact of the 1918-19 influenza pandemic
in Montana. It highlights the suddenness and severity of the disease, recounting how previously
healthy individuals succumbed rapidly. Despite prior preparedness, Montana faced challenges
similar to other states. The document underscores the virus’s lethal nature, explaining how it
overwhelms the immune system, leading to pneumonia and death. It also provides insights into
the origin and mutation of the virus. The document traces the waves of the pandemic in Montana
and emphasizes the toll on the population, particularly young adults. Overall, it offers crucial
historical insights into the profound effects of the influenza pandemic on Montana (The
Influenza Epidemic and Public Heath,
Mullen, and Nelson)
Discuss the author of each source, the main message, the dates, the places mentioned, the main
point. Then choose a quote from each source that you feel best represents the main point of the
source.
"Every general practitioner practicing midwifery should be an expert. Obstetrics is not a
specialty that can be in the hands of a few, like some other specialties, for at any moment the
accoucheur, perhaps soon after being qualified, may be called upon to deal with a sudden
emergency during pregnancy, childbirth, or the puerperium; such a case will not be met by a
consultation in a few days' time; it must be dealt with at once" ("The Pandemic Of Influenza,
1918-19" 355-356).
"The influenza pandemic in 1918-1919 was the world's most serious natural catastrophe of the
twentieth century... In this country, Montana had a high level of infection and ranked as one of
the four hardest hit states. Survivors still recall with horror their brush with mortality" (Mullen
and Nelson 1987, 50).
Finally, compare and contrast the two sources together and write a one to two-sentence
working argument. In other words, what do the sources tell us about your topic and why?
These two sources offer complementary insights into the 1918019 influenza pandemic.
“The pandemic of influenza, by the British Medical Journal” highlights the critical need for
specialized education and preparedness in obstetrics and midwifery, highlighting the potential
impact on maternal health and the importance of hands-on experience and exposure to expert
practitioners. On the other hand the second Primary source, “Montanas and the most peculiar
disease, the Infuleza epidemic, and public Heath” provides a broader societal perspective,
shedding light on the widespread impact of the pandemic in Montana, emphasizing the
vulnerability of young adults, and exposing systemic challenges in public heath responses.
Thother, both of the sources demonstrate the multifaceted nature of the pandemic’s effects,
highlighting the significance of tailored medical education and comprehensive public health
strategies in mitigating future health crises.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help