Trangdai__Huynh_HIS_200__Applied_History (3)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
200-R4158
Subject
History
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by SargentHyena1674
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 1 Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Be sure to respond to this question in no more than one sentence, using proper grammar.
To gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers, I would apply the lenses of cultural exchange, political power dynamics, and economic competition.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 2 Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be
longer than one sentence.
While disputes over land played a significant role in conflicts between Natives and white settlers in the early 19th century, reducing the issue to a single cause ignores the complex interplay of factors such as political ambitions, cultural clashes, and racial prejudice.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 3 Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw.
From the reading, I could use the Political Lens, Cultural Lens, and the Economic Lens.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 4 Massasoit's decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one or two.)
Massasoit's decision to approach the Pilgrims was contingent on two major events: the devastating smallpox epidemic that decimated the Patuxet tribe (Squanto's people), weakening the Wampanoag and increasing their vulnerability; and the threat posed by the Narragansett tribe, pushing Massasoit to seek an alliance with the Pilgrims for mutual protection.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 5
Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.
Short-term: The alliance led to a peaceful coexistence and cooperation in the first years, with Squanto's help allowing the Pilgrims to survive through their first harvest.
Long-term: The alliance ultimately benefited the Pilgrims more, tilting the power balance and
contributing to the decline of the Wampanoag, culminating in King Philip's War and their near-decimation.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 6 How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about
your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it.
My understanding of the Kent State shootings has evolved significantly. Initially, I held a simplistic view, focusing solely on the National Guard's firing on unarmed students and the immediate aftermath. Research exposed the complexities of the situation, revealing the escalating tensions on campus, the role of the media in shaping public perception, and the long-lasting impact of the event on American society. One misconception I corrected was the belief that the Guard opened fire without provocation, while the extent of student aggression remains debated, research revealed instances of rock-throwing and arson targeting the Guard, adding context to their actions.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 7 Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee
Removal. Specify one aspect of this event for each lens that you cite.
Analyzing the Cherokee Removal through political, economic, social, and military lenses reveals its complexity. Politically, President Jackson and Southern states pushed for land expansion, while economically, the desire for Cherokee resources fueled the removal. Socially, the Cherokee faced cultural disruption and loss of their way of life, while militarily, forced marches and internment camps marked the harsh reality of the removal.
Module 7 Short Responses – Question 8 Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: "The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it." Cite at least three historical facts that support your position.
Disagree. While the Treaty of New Echota was deeply flawed and the National Party's opposition had merit, it cannot be definitively deemed "invalid."
Limited Representation: The treaty was signed by a small group of Cherokee leaders, not representing the majority of the Cherokee Nation. This lack of broad-based consent casts doubt on the legitimacy of the agreement.
Fraudulent Processes: Evidence suggests coercion and bribery were employed to secure signatures, further questioning the treaty's validity. The National Party's claims of fraudulent practices hold weight.
Majority Opposition: The National Party, representing the vast majority of Cherokees, vehemently opposed the treaty. Their strong disapproval signifies the treaty's lack of consensus among the Cherokee people.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help