MCC 520 syllabus 12wk(3)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Colorado Christian University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
530
Subject
Health Science
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
11
Uploaded by ElderStar14447
Bellevue University
MCC 520: Human Development Throughout the Lifespan
3 Graduate Credit hour, 12 week course
Syllabus Spring 2023
Instructor:
Ph.D. Kyle Brezinski
Office Phone:
N/A
Office Hours:
M-T 10am-3pm CST
Email address:
kbrezinski@bellevue.edu
BEST Way to reach me: EMAIL
R
e
quir
e
d Course
T
e
x
t
s
:
American Psychological Association (2009). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6
th ed.). American Psychological Association: Washington D.C.
Broderick, P.C., & Blewitt, P. (2020). The Life Span: Human Development for Helping Professionals (5
th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Prerequisites: Admissions into the Master’s program in Clinical Counseling at Bellevue University
Credit: 3 Credit Hours
Catalog Description: This course surveys theories, scholarship, and research on human development throughout the lifespan. Students examine biological, neurological, cognitive, emotional, and social- cultural factors influencing individual development within a multicultural framework. The reciprocal influences of crises, transitions, normal and abnormal development, psychopathology, and familial and community relationships are addressed. Particular attention on the application of these concepts to the work of professional counselors is explored.
Purpose: This course is required for completion of the Master’s program in Clinical Counseling.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Upon completion of this course, students should be able to:
Knowledge Standards
How/where covered and measured
II.G.3.a
Develop an understanding of theories of individual and family development and transitions across the life span.
Readings, Discussion, Exams, Human Development Application Paper
II.G.3.b
Develop an understanding of theories of learning and
personality development, including current understandings about neurobiological behavior.
Readings, Discussion, Exams, Human Development Application Paper
II.
G.3.d
. Develop an understanding of theories and models of individual, cultural, couple, family, and community resilience.
Readings, Discussion, Exams, Human Development Application Paper
II.G.3.e
Develop a general framework for understanding exceptional abilities and strategies for differentiated interventions. Readings, Discussion, Exams
II.G.3.f
Develop understanding of human behavior, including
an understanding of developmental crises, disability, psychopathology, and situational and environmental factors that affect both normal and abnormal behavior.
Readings, Discussion, Exams, Human Development Application Paper
II.G.3.h
Develop an understanding of theories for facilitating optimal development and wellness over the life span.
Readings, Discussion, Exams, Human Development Application Paper
Residential Class Attendance Policy
Attendance is mandatory. You are expected to attend every class meeting. If you are unable to attend you must contact me in advance for an alternative assignment. There may be points associated with class participation. If you do not notify me of your absence in advance, you will not
be allowed to make up the points that you missed. Online Attendance Policy
Attendance is mandatory. Online students are required to routinely log-into Blackboard and submit
their assignments as scheduled by the syllabus. The student will receive a letter of nonattendance if
the student has not logged-in to their course or submitted any assignments for more than seven
consecutive days per course. Nonattendance could impact a student’s ability to receive financial
aid. Online students encountering special situations which will prohibit them from accessing their
course and meeting their course obligations should contact their instructor. Instructor Communication Policy
:
I will make every effort to communicate with you within 48 hours (not including weekends or
holidays). E-mail is the most efficient way to communicate with me. Additionally, please make
sure to have your updated e-mail in the Bellevue University system, as that is how I will
communicate with you. If you have multiple e-mails, you can go into the system to have e-mail
automatically forwarded to other e-mails. I would suggest simply using your assigned Bellevue
University e-mail. Regardless of what e-mail you choose, make sure to have it updated so you do
not miss any correspondence related to the course. Student Expectations
:
Students are expected to embody and display professional interactions and behaviors in all aspects
of this course. This behaviors and interactions reflect those commonly expected from professional
counselors and human services professionals. This includes, but is not limited to, respectful
dialogue and interactions with faculty, students, and staff. Students not maintaining professional
behavior will be advised; and, this advisement will be part of the documentation of the student’s
progress and performance in the program. Additionally, if warranted, further action may be taken
to address inappropriate or unacceptable behavior, which may include removal from the course
and/or program.
All assignments in the course should be completed using the most recent publication of the APA
manual, especially with regards to writing academic papers.
*Note – all assignments are to be submitted electronically in Word format. No late work will be accepted in this class. This includes all assignments, exams, discussion boards, and anything else the instructor assigns for credit.
Please note the term ends on the Saturday
of the last week of class, not Sunday. All coursework must be completed by the last Saturday of the course – no exceptions.
Assignments
:
Assignments are designed to reflect the students’ retention and synthesis of knowledge of
counseling theories and models. Rubric for evaluation of the discussion board posting is available
under the Rubrics tab.
Discussion: (230 points)
Discussion enhances learning as you share your ideas, perspectives,
and experiences with the class. You develop and refine your thoughts through the writing
process, plus broaden your classmates’ understanding of the course content. You promote a professional, substantive discussion. Use the following feedback to improve the quality of your discussion contributions.
Discussion will take place in both Residential and Online formats of the course. In the Residential format,
students are expected to fully engage in class discussions as outlined in
the Rubric below. Instructor guided peer to peer discussion facilitates deeper learning and your development as a professional.
In the Online Discussion, you
will be required to make original posts and respond to peers each
week in response to assigned questions to deepen your learning. Students are expected to be
thorough in their responses to these questions, using graduate-level writing, correct grammar, and
APA format. Please refer to the rubric explaining how postings will be evaluated. Please note
there may be multiple questions housed within one posting assignment; and, all questions posed
must be addressed.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Discussion boards will have two original discussion posts per week (with a few exceptions): the
first will be due by 11:59 p.m. CT on the Wednesday of the week, and the second will be due by
11:59 p.m. CT on the Sunday of the week. Two responses to other students’ posts (to both
discussion boards) are due by 11:59 p.m. CST on the Sunday of the week. All discussion boards
are worth 10 points (up to 5 points for the primary post and up to 5 points for peer responses). Masters of Clinical Counseling Online Discussion
Grading Rubric
Di
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
Ru
b
r
i
c
#1
–
P
r
ima
r
y p
o
st
Criteria
Unacceptable
Needs Improvement
Competent
Excellent
Content
(up to 3 points)
No post or does
not address the assignment
(0 points)
Addresses the
assignment but response lacks detail and appropriate vocabulary or is incomplete
Addresses the full
assignment and uses appropriate
detail and vocabulary
Addresses the full
assignment and uses appropriate detail and vocabulary plus presents additional examples or resources
References
(up to 1 point)
Does not cite
appropriate references (if required)
(including textbook) (0 points)
Includes
reference citation
but incomplete (if required) Includes complete
reference information but APA format error (if required)
Includes complete
reference information in proper APA format
(if required) Spelling,
Grammar & word choice (up to 1 point)
Many spelling and
grammatical errors or lacks clarity in vocabulary
(0 points)
Uses vocabulary
from the text but inappropriately or several spelling or grammar errors Uses vocabulary
from the text appropriately, few spelling or grammar errors.
Uses vocabulary
from the text appropriately, no grammar or spelling errors
Di
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
Ru
b
r
i
c
#2
–
Pe
e
r
Re
p
li
e
s
Criteria
Unacceptable
Needs Improvement
Competent
Excellent
Peer replies (up to 5 points for 2 replies)
No peer reply posted
(0 points)
Mostly Restates,
compliments, or agrees with peers’ posts. Excessive grammar and spelling errors (3 points)
Provides some additional insight
to peers’ post but largely restates own primary post.
Minimal grammar
and spelling errors (4 points)
Provides additional insight,
example, resource,
disagrees, or respectfully corrects an error in
peer’s post. No grammar or spelling errors. (5p
points)
Please note: All discussions in this course are worth 10 points. You can earn up to 5 points for your primary post (grading rubric #1) and up to 5 points for your peer responses (grading rubric #2). All deadlines are clearly noted in each Discussion Board assignment. No posts outside the current
week will be considered when computing your grade because the class discussion has ended. Masters of Clinical Counseling
Residential Discussion
Grading Rubric
Criteria
Unacceptable
Needs Improvement
Competent
Excellent
Content
Does
not address the assignment
Addresses the
assignment but response lacks detail and appropriate vocabulary or is incomplete
Addresses the full
assignment and uses appropriate detail and vocabulary
Addresses the full
assignment and uses appropriate detail and vocabulary plus presents additional examples or resources.
Engagement in the Discussion
Does not participate in the discussion
Responds to at least one peer in the discussion but comments are tangential or general to the topic
Responds to at least one peer and comments are directly related to the topic and assignment at hand.
Responds to multiple
peers and comments are related to the topic and assignment
at hand and expand the discussion in some way.
Please note – discussions missed in class can only be made up if you notify the instructor in advance for an
alternative assignment.
Human Development Application Paper (150 Points)
This assignment gives you the opportunity to apply the life span development concepts you have been learning throughout the course. **The Instructor will choose which film to use in your course.
Access the film
The Breakfast Club
(1985) by John Hughes for this assignment. No substitutions. Select one of these characters:
John Bender (played be Judd Nelson)
Andrew Clark (played by Emilio Estevez)
Brian Johnson (played by Anthony Michael Hall)
Allison Reynolds (played by Ally Sheedy)
Claire Standish (played by Molly Ringwald)
OR
Access the film My Girl (1991) by Howard Zieff for this assignment. No substitutions. Use this character: Vada Sultenfuss (played by Anna Chlumsky)
Once you have identified which character you will analyze, fully cover the following topics in your
paper:
Introduction
Describe the character. Include general review of physical, cognitive, socioemotional and multicultural information. Describe why the character was placed in detention.
Physical Development
Consider the ways in which the character demonstrates “normal” physical development through the use of at least 2 peer-reviewed empirical journal articles (and your text). Note any ways in which the character does not fit the expected adolescent physical developmental milestones. (Cite these ideas)
Cognitive Development
Consider the ways in which the character demonstrates “normal” cognitive development through the use of at least 2 peer-reviewed empirical journal articles (and your text). Note any ways in which the character does not fit the expected adolescent cognitive developmental milestones. (Cite these ideas)
Social Development
Based on theory and research, consider the ways in which the character demonstrates “normal” social development with the use of at least 2 peer-reviewed empirical journal articles (and your text). Note any ways in which the character does not fit the expected adolescent social developmental milestones. (Cite these ideas)
Identity Development
Based on theory and research, consider the ways in which the character demonstrates “normal” identity development with the use of at least 2 peer-reviewed empirical journal articles (and your text). Note any ways in which the character does not fit the expected adolescent identity developmental milestones. (Cite these ideas)
Implications for practice
Considering the factors identified in the above sections, how would a professional counselor incorporate the developmental theory and research in their work with this client (character)? Be specific here. What might application of this theory and research look like in the counseling room? (Cite these ideas)
Resilience
Define resiliency based on the text and your research. Using your text and 2 peer-reviewed
empirical journal articles, discuss factors that suggest your character currently has a high, medium or low level of resiliency. Identify social and/or behavioral changes that could help the character become more resilient.
Resilience for Minorities
. This film has very little diversity – gender and socio-economic diversity is present; all the students are approximately the same age. There is no diversity in race and sexual orientation. Consider an additional character in the film (one we add), who is a person of color and/or homosexual/bisexual/transgendered. What does the research suggest the kay factors of resilience would be for a minority teenager? Do they differ from resilience factors for white teens? In what ways?
Personal Reflection on Adolescence
Summarize your adolescent development applying developmental theories and concepts to
yourself (using text). Be through here – reviewing physical, cognitive, social and identity developmental stages and issues.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Conclusion
Briefly summarize the paper. Then discuss your overall reaction to the assignment. What did you learn about yourself and life span development through this assignment. NOTE: All research used for this paper should have been published within the last 10 years.
RUBRIC for Human Development Application Paper
CRITERIA
Needs Improvement (C or below)
Competent (B) Proficient (A) Content:
Developmental
dynamics
(50 points)
Paper did not fully
complete the assignment as outlined. (39 or fewer points)
Paper covered all ten sections of the assignment adequately.
Mostly appropriate research was selected. Analysis of developmental dynamics presented was adequate. (40-44 points)
Paper fully covered all
ten sections of the assignment in a clear and thorough way. Appropriate research was selected. Thorough analysis of developmental dynamics is presented.
(45-50 points)
Content:
Resilience
(40 points)
Paper did not fully
complete the assignment as outlined.
(31 or fewer points)
Resilience research presented was current, appropriate and thorough. Student demonstrated some insight into diversity issues present.
(32-35 points)
Resilience research presented was current,
appropriate and thorough. Student demonstrated insight into diversity issues present. (36-40 points)
Content:
Personal Reflection
(40 points)
Paper did not fully
complete the assignment as outlined.
(31 or fewer points)
Personal reflection demonstrated some insight and somewhat thoughtful application of the developmental concepts. (32-35 points)
Personal reflection demonstrated insight and thoughtful application of the developmental concepts. (36-40 points)
Composition: Grammar, Writing, Format - APA Style (20 points possible)
Poorly written, illogical, rambling.
Low level writing skills. APA Style or citations missing or mostly incorrect.
(15 or fewer points)
Adequate writing with 4-6 errors in grammar, format, composition or APA citations. Mostly well organized. Needs sharper focus and better composition. (16-17points)
Effective writing for graduate level with accurate grammar, format and APA citations. Well organized. No more than 3 errors. (18-20 points)
Exams
Three exams will be administered throughout the course to assess your understanding,
comprehension, and application of lifespan development topics. The exams will contain multiple
choice questions. Dates Exams are available and DUE:
Exam One (Ch 1-5): Week Six
Exam Two (Ch 6-10): Week 10
Exam Three (Ch 7-11): Week 12
Please note the term ends on the Saturday of the last week of class, not Sunday. All coursework
must be completed by then – no exceptions.
G
r
a
di
n
g
:
Discussion Boards
230 Points
Human Development Application Paper
150 Points
Exam I:
100 Points
Exam II:
100 Points
Exam III:
100 Points
Total Points:
680 Points
A total of 680 points are available to earn in the class, and letter grades will be assigned a percentage.
Please note per Bellevue University policy, students must earn a letter grade of C or above to pass a
graduate course without being required to retake the class. Earning a letter grade of C- or below
necessitates retaking the course, which is at the student’s expense. Additionally, regardless of
grades in individual courses, students are required to maintain an overall cumulative GPA of 3.0.
If a student falls below this threshold they will be placed on academic probation, and may
subsequently be dismissed from the program.
Assignment Grading and Feedback
Normally feedback on assignments will be provided within one week of the due date – for all assignments submitted on time. This means, for instance, that grading for week one will typically be complete by the end of week 2. If you have any questions about feedback, please reach out to your instructor.
Late Work Policy
:
Because of the nature of an online learning environment, no late discussion board posts or exams
will be accepted. Other late assignments will receive a penalty deduction of 10%. Assignments
more than two weeks late will not be accepted. At the instructor’s discretion, exceptions can be
made to this policy; however, exceptions would typically constitute documented
illnesses or
emergencies. Having heavy workloads, both with school and work commitments, family
functions, and vacations are examples of non-approved exceptions. Students who foresee issues
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
with their schedules and plans should be proactive and plan to accommodate for these issues by
completing assignments prior to the due date or working with the instructor for alternative
arrangements.
MSCC Academic Honesty Policy:
The Master of Science in Clinical Counseling of Bellevue University Academic Honesty Policy is in addition to the overall University Policy. Any time students commit academic dishonesty they show little concern for their own personal sense of integrity, and they infringe on the rights of all other members of the academic community. The following definitions and examples are forms of academic integrity violations:
Cheating
. No student shall use or attempt to use materials, notes, or information from another student for normal course work that is intended to be done on an individual basis, either in class or out of class. Examples include, but are not limited to: (1) copying from another person’s research, paper, test or quiz, (2) using testing aids during a test where no permission has been given by the Instructor, (3) copying another’s work, (4) collaborating on any written work, without specific permission by the Instructor, or (5) allowing another person to do your work, (6) taking an exam for another student or (7) allowing another person to take an exam for you. Multiple Submissions
. No students shall submit a paper (in part or in whole) or any other assignment (in part or in whole) which was submitted for academic credit for any other course.
Plagiarism
. No student shall present the work of another person as their own without the specific citation of the original author. Examples include, but are not limited to: (1) the use of another’s complete sentences or key words without quotation marks and accurate citations, (2) graphs and charts, or (3) ideas and information provided by another. Computer programs, files, and web pages must also be utilized only with the inclusion of a citation referencing or indicating the original source of the file and/or program.
Consequences of Academic Dishonesty.
The first violation of the academic policy will result in a
score of zero for the assignment, paper, exam, etc. The incident (including supporting documentation) will be reported to the Program Director who will keep the record of the incident on file until the student graduates from the program. The program director will forward the information about the violation to the office of Student Affairs. If a second violation of the academic honesty policy occurs, the student will receive a failing grade in the course in which the violation occurred. The incident (with supporting documentation) will again be reported to the Program Director who will keep the record of the incident on file until the student graduates from the program. This incident will be reported to the office of Student Affairs. If a third incident occurs, the student will be removed from MSCC program with no opportunity to return to the program. The student may appeal decisions regarding Academic Dishonesty as per the university policy.
Need to Change Assignments and Requirements
:
While not typical, the instructor reserves the right to make any necessary changes to the course as needed, which may include but is not limited to, readings, point values, assignments, grading criteria, due dates, exams, and corrections to unforeseen errors in any aspect of the course. The
instructor will provide students with notifications of any changes, and will provide students an opportunity to adjust to these changes in a timely and reasonable manner determined by the instructor.
Course Topics, Readings and Assignments
Date
Topic
Reading
Assignments
Chapters
Week #1
Organizing Themes in Development
1
See Discussion Board
topics
Week #2
Epigenesis & the Brain: The Fundamentals of
Behavioral Development
2
See Discussion Board
topics
Week #3
Cognitive Development in the Early Years
3
See Discussion Board
topics
Week #4
Emotional Development in the Early Years
4
See Discussion Board
topics
Week #5
Emerging Self & Socialization in the Early Years
5
See Discussion Board
topics
Week #6
Realms of Cognition in Middle Childhood
6
Exam One
(Ch 1-5)
Week #7
Middle Childhood to Early Adolescence: Self &
Moral Development and Gender & Peer Relationships
7 & 8
See Discussion Board
topics
Week #8
Physical, Cognitive, & Identity Development in Adolescence
9
See Discussion
Board topics
Week #9
The Social World of Adolescence
10
See Discussion Board
topics
Week #10
Young Adulthood: Physical & Cognitive Development in Young Adulthood & Socialemotional and Vocational Development
11 & 12
Exam Two (Ch 6-10)
Week #11
Middle Adulthood: Cognitive, Personality, & Social
Development
13
Human Development
Application Paper
DUE
Week #12
Adulthood &Late Adulthood Living Well: Stress, Coping, and Life Satisfaction & Gains and Losses in Late Adulthood
14 & 15
Exam Three (Ch 11-15)