6021 Assessment 3 Instructions

Assessment 3 Instructions: Quality Improvement Presentation Poster  PRINT  Create an abstract (100-250 words) and a poster for a presentation with voice-over for a quality improvement plan to executive-level leadership. Introduction Note : Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, it is recommended that you complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented. As a master's-level nurse you will be responsible for promoting equitable quality of care. In the biopsychosocial model of care, there are a number of areas where you can have an impact on improving the quality, safety, and equitability of care. One example area where equitable quality of care is an issue is with medications, especially considering the cost of various medications to treat the same condition versus the effectiveness and potential side-effects of the medications. A further pharmacological concern for safe and quality care is medication errors. This could include considerations like a patient getting the wrong medication or a dangerous interaction due to other aspects of a patient's health and treatment situation. An example could be vitamin or herbal supplements the patient has not disclosed as part of the medication reconciliation process. The ability to propose and promote quality improvements in care is a vital skill for a master's-prepared nurse. One aspect of this is understanding strategies for implementing best practice changes in a team, department, or care setting. Another is understanding how best practices can help lead to a continuous quality improvement cycle. Additionally, it is important to grasp how successful change strategies can be leveraged to help in the creation or implementation of clinical best practices. Part of this is considering the audience when proposing quality improvement

projects or new best practices. Another part of this is being able to effectively communicate the goals, rationale, and benefits of a project. One way to communicate the need for quality improvements, and your plans for achieving specific improvements, is through a presentation poster. This type of communication tool is used both in the work place and at professional and academic conferences. Being able to convey the essence and value of a project in a compelling and succinct way is a valuable skill, and it is vital within the constraints of a single poster. Professional Context As a master's-level nurse, you will be responsible for promoting equitable quality of care. In the biopsychosocial (BPS) model of care, there are a number of areas where you can have an impact on improving the quality, safety, and equitability of care. One example area where equitable quality of care is an issue is with medications, especially considering the cost of various medications to treat the same condition versus the effectiveness and potential side-effects of the medications. A further pharmacological concern for safe and quality care is medication errors. This could include considerations like a patient getting the wrong medication or a dangerous interaction due to other aspects of a patient's health and treatment situation. An example could be vitamin or herbal supplements the patient has not disclosed as part of the medication reconciliation process. Scenario For this assessment, you may take any number of approaches. Two suggestions are:  Build upon the clinical issue that was the focus of your Change Strategy and Implementation assessment, and turn it into a full, organization- or community-wide quality improvement (QI) initiative.  Or, identify a new issue related to a BPS clinical issue. The focus here should be on a specific patient or health care setting

 Propose quality improvement methods to promote continuous improvement related to a specific biopsychosocial consideration.  Evaluate specific evidence that supports the quality improvement methods proposed.  Explain how the project is grounded in successful change strategies.  Analyze the way in which interprofessional teamwork will improve the effectiveness or efficiency of the quality improvement project.  Communicate quality improvement considerations to relevant stakeholders in a way that is clear, concise, and compelling for the audience.  Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Example assessment: You may use the assessment example, Assessment 3 Example [PPTX] , to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like. Submission Requirements  Length of submission:  Abstract: 100–250 words. Your abstract should be succinct and precise.  Poster: Make sure your poster fits entirely onto a single poster template page (or slide) and contains all of the sections described in the assessment instructions.  Number of references: Cite a minimum of 5–7 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your considerations and plans. Resources should be no more than five years old.  APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

 Competency 1: Design patient-centered, evidence-based, advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality patient outcomes.  Evaluate specific evidence that supports the quality improvement methods proposed.  Competency 2: Develop change strategies for improving the care environment.  Explain how the project is grounded in successful change strategies.  Competency 3: Apply quality improvement methods to practice that promote safe, equitable quality of care.  Propose quality improvement methods to promote continuous improvement related to a specific biopsychosocial consideration.  Competency 4: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional care systems in achieving desired health care improvement outcomes.  Analyze the way in which interprofessional teamwork will improve the effectiveness or efficiency of the quality improvement project.  Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.  Poster is presented in a way that is clear, concise, and compelling for the audience.  Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.  SCORING GUIDE Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated. VIEW SCORING GUIDE Quality Improvement Presentation Poster Scoring Guide CRITERIA NON- PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHE D Propose quality Does not Explains quality Proposes Proposes

CRITERIA NON- PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHE D grounded in successful change strategies. change strategy. but does not explain it related to the project. grounded in successful change strategies. grounded in successful change strategies. Acknowledges potential difficulties and discusses how those challenges will be met. Analyze the way in which interprofessiona l teamwork will improve the effectiveness or efficiency of the quality improvement project. Does not analyze interprofessiona l teamwork strategies. Analyzes interprofessiona l teamwork strategies, but either does not address how those strategies will improve effectiveness or efficiency, or does not relate the strategies to the project. Analyzes the way in which interprofessiona l teamwork will improve the effectiveness or efficiency of the quality improvement project. Analyzes the way in which interprofessiona l teamwork will improve the effectiveness or efficiency of the quality improvement project. Identifies assumptions upon which the analysis is based. Poster is presented in a way that is clear, concise, and compelling for the audience. Does not communicate quality improvement considerations to relevant stakeholders in a way that is clear, concise, and compelling for the audience. Communicates quality considerations in a way that is not consistently clear and concise, or in a way that is not relevant or compelling for the audience. Communicates quality improvement considerations to relevant stakeholders in a way that is clear, concise, and compelling for the audience. Communicates quality improvement considerations to relevant stakeholders in a way that is clear, concise, and compelling for the audience. The structure of the communication enables the audience to

CRITERIA NON- PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHE D grasp complex concepts and encourages buy-in. Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Does not integrate relevant sources to support assertions; does not correctly format citations and references using current APA style. Sources lack relevance or are poorly integrated, or citations or references are incorrectly formatted. Integrates relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Integrates relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Citations are free from all errors.