Burgess Shale Activity Feburary 2023
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of British Columbia, Okanagan *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MISC
Subject
Geology
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
Pages
7
Uploaded by PresidentUniverseGoldfish29
Lab 2 - Burgess Shale Activity Do you think the Burgess Shale specimens illustrated in Lesson 6
of the course notes represent a reasonable
approximation of the actual
relative abundance of species found in the Burgess Shale? Do they represent actual rela
tive l
ifestyles? Foodweb niches? You will address these questions in t
hree
steps.
1.
Have a general look around the amazing website created by the Royal Ontario Museum shown here:
https://burgess-shale.rom.on.ca/introduction/
. Figure out where you are in general and what the website
has to offer in terms of fleshing out the Burgess Shale fossil deposit.
2.
First record key characteristics for each specimen onto a copy of Table 1
(below) using information from the
Burgess Shale website at https://burgess-shale.rom.on.ca/fossil-gallery/main-gallery/
.
> AT THE SAME TIME, using that database, find the real samples shown in Table 2
and add the species name
and other information to complete Table 2.
3.
Then use results to address questions presented on Canvas
about abundance, living habit and foodweb
niche by referring to data in your tables.
Guidelines 1.
Read all these instructions first!
2.
We expect this
lab to take you between 1 and 2 hours.
3.
Use paper versions of the tables (below) first, because you will be browsing the Burgess Shale specimen
database to obtain your data.
4.
Find the data webpage for each specific organism, including high resolution images of fossils, starting at
https://burgess-shale.rom.on.ca/fossil-gallery/main-gallery/
. Here’s how …
a.
Click on the
link
above or paste it into your browser.
Loading may take several seconds.
b.
Use your browser’s built-in find function (CTRL-f in Firefox) to find the specific organism.
c.
Artist impressions of specimens in your notes are impressive, but - what do the fossils look like from
which these imagined illustrations were derived? Good question –
so –
complete Table 2
at the
same time as Table 1
by finding the specific image of the fossil for each specimen, and matching it in
Table 2’s second column to the numbered artist’s illustrations provided after Table 2. This should be
easy for most but please note that in Table 2 some images are not oriented the same way as they
are on the website.
d.
Finding the fossil images is important because detailed information needed for Table 1
is on the
specimen pages associated those fossil images
. If you can't find the exact image, use the information
given in the other images to get your required data. Data are well organized on each specimen’s
page, so
you should be able to complete both tables quickly once you are familiar with how data are
presented.
5.
When Tables 1 and 2 are complete, you are ready to complete the question set on Canvas. This is not a test
but a means of checking your data and addressing the questions which are the underlying purpose of this
activity.
6.
There is an OPEN discussion forum on the class discussion board accessible to everyone for discussions with
your colleagues about this activity AND (of course) you can discuss anything you like (any time) in your small
groups. There is NO formal group component for this activity.
That’s it; have fun. These are amazing creatures & the Burgess Shale fossils tell a unique and fantastic story!
Questions you will see on Canvas: 1-2. Match illustrations to fossils.
3.
Is there enough information on the data webpage for each organism to generate an age-range diagram
showing the time spans during which each of the 10 organisms lived?
4.
From your completed copy of Table 1, the fossil that is the largest OTHER than Anomalocaris
is [***], the
smallest is [***], the rarest arthropod (based on number of specimens) is [***], and the one fossil that is a
mold rather than fossilized body parts or remains is [***]. Finally the one that may have eaten Ogygopsis
is
[***] . Finally the one organism NOT described in course notes is [***].
5.
Several observations or experiments have helped suggest that the relationship between Ogygopsis
and its
so-called predator is still rather uncertain. What are these lines of evidence? For each of the following,
choose "True" if the observation DOES contribute to this uncertainty and "False" if the observation does
NOT contribute to that uncertainty, or if the observation was not mentioned. Obtain answers by reading the
following very short item (roughly 450 words): The Geological Society of America. "Earth's first great
predator wasn't: Carnivorous 'shrimp' not so fierce, 3-D model shows." ScienceDaily.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101101083148.htm (accessed August 31, 2015).
True false for
each: a.
Calculations that simulate Anomalocaris
mouth action
b.
Fossil evidence of mouth action
c.
Calculations that simulate mouth hardness
d.
Fossil evidence of mouth hardness
e.
Calculations that simulate digestive processes
f.
Fossil evidence of gut contents or feces (or lack thereof)
g.
Fossil evidence that other things were being eaten
6.
Which phylum is most abundant in OUR little sample of 10 species?
7.
Is this consistent with information about relative abundance of SPECIES
at the Walcott Quarry site
provided
on that page? Answer this by find
ing the "Walcott Quarry Community" page.
Keep this page open
for
subsequent questions!
8.
Again from the “
Walcott Quarry Community
” pag
e, the lifestyle that is most well-represented by all known
Burgess Shale
spec
ies
is [***], and the lifestyle most well-represented by our own small set of 10
organisms
is [***].
The lifestyle that is NOT represented in our own small set is [***]. If there are technical
terms you
are
unsure of, look them up by googling them.
9.
Which food web niche is most well-represented by our own small set of 10 organisms?
10.
Based on the (admittedly simplified) figure of the Burgess Shale food web, which food web niche would we
EXPECT to be most abundant in a real Burgess Shale community?
1
6
.
Due to
the diversity and quality of preserved organisms the Burgess Shale Walcott Quarry site is truly a
“
lagerstatten
” (look up that word!) Now imagine that the 10 samples we have been studying were the only
samples from this field site. This would be a much more common scenario. Indicate how you suspect
paleontologists would have interpreted these characteristics of the ecosystem based on these 10 alone?
End of questions on Canvas. 11.
From your table of fossil images, how many of these specimens was “complete” –
i.e. a whole organism, not
just parts? Enter just a number, not a word [*].
12.
Does this seem to you to be a likely “normal” proportion of complete fossils that one could expect in any
other fossil collection?
13.
Consider the conditions used to photograph fossils that you recorded in Table 2. Imagine you have a
colleague who wants to document her collection using all four types of conditions but finds she has only
enough funding to use three. Given your “experience” (i.e. data you compiled in Table 2) which of the four
combinations of conditions would you recommend as being the LEAST useful for most fossils?
14.
Put the following types of evidence that help paleontologists identify likely diet or feeding habits into order
from most convincing to least. There could be some debate about one or two of these, so this question is
worth only a small amount.
15. W
here is the mouth on this Opabinia
? Hint: You may have to do a quick bit of internet research to find the
answer to this!
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Table 1, Burgess Shale sample characteristics.
Use https://burgess-shale.rom.on.ca/main-gallery/
. One is done as an example
.
Species Phylum Age (My) Max size (mm) Abun- dance Habit Mob- ility Feeding Feeding evidence 1 Pikaia Chordata 505 50 R N/N M deposit mud in gut 2 Opabinia
3 Hallucigenia
4 Anomalocaris 5 Canadaspis 6 Aysheaia 7 Sanctacaris 8 Ogygopsis 9 Hazelia 10 Wiwaxia Column values: Complete blanks using terms or codes as follows:
Phylum: Arthropoda, Chordata, Onychophora, Mollusca, or Porifera
Abundance of whole or partial specimens:
R=rare, C=common, or A=abundant
Habit:
Ep=Epibenthic, En=Endobenthic, Nb=Nektobenthic, Nt=Nektonic, N/N=Nektonic or nektobenthic
Mobility:
M=mobile, S=sessile
Feeding:
carnivorous, deposit, suspension feeder, herviborous, scavenger
Feeding evidence:
very short comment on evidence used to infer feeding style.
Table 2: specimen photographs. Row one is completed for you as an example. While completing Table 1, find specimens shown in this table, and fill in blank table cells. Information will be in the caption to the high resolution “zoomable” figure of each specimen. Note: - Lighting options
:
dry direct, dry polarized, wet direct, wet polarized. - “Completeness” options
: complete, partial, incomplete by implication, not stated.
Specimen photograph Genus name & specimen “completeness”
Conditions and lighting for specimen photos Ogygopsis Incomplete by implication Dry, direct light
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Illustrations from EOSC326 notes, Lesson 7. Numbering is arbitrary. 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10