Lab 8 Tornadoes
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Binghamton University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
116
Subject
Geology
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by CaptainMonkeyMaster957
Geology 116, Spring 2023
Name __________________
Lab 8 Tornadoes
You can find a lot of information about tornadoes on the
Online Tornado FAQ Page
. We’ll be using a number of
links from the page, but feel free to explore more!
Section 1:
Tornado Scale
The intensity of tornadoes is generally measured in the U.S. using the Enhanced Fujita damage scale
(
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/efscale/
).
This is modified from a less quantitatively based scale devised in 1971 by
Dr. T. Theodore Fujita; the enhanced scale provides more accurate values of the wind speeds associated with
different levels of damage.
Tornadoes often occur in outbreaks, with multiple tornadoes being produced along one frontal boundary,
sometimes close in both space and time.
One of the highest number of tornadoes in an outbreak occurred
when 412 tornadoes touched down between May 1 and 10, 2003.
One of the hardest hit areas was near
Pierce City, Missouri.
1) Use the links below and the storm path map and photos of damage to try estimating damage yourself based
on the Enhanced Fujita damage scale.
2) Watch the
video
that shows examples of damage at various EF levels:
.
3) Review the EF-scale, including the general criteria and damage results, as well as the illustrations below.
Damage at different EF levels, Greenburg KS tornado
4) Based on the descriptions and photos for these different levels of tornadoes, estimate the EF-scale number
and description of damage for the photos from the May 4 2003 tornado outbreak in Missouri that are shown
on the next page.
City
EF Estimate
Wind Speed Est.
Description of Damage
Pierce City, MO
3
136-165 mph
Whole building has damage. Cars damaged.
Clever, MO
1
65- 80 mph
Pretty much no damage except for some broken
trees.
Battlefield, MO
2
11-135 mph
Roof not there but building is standing. Cars
damaged and on top of each other.
5) Find information from internet sources about the effects of the tornado at the three locations listed on the
next page. What was the full extent of damage? There were multiple tornadoes during the outbreak in the
region. How did this tornado compare with others in the outbreak?
Along this path there were hundreds of large trees uprooted and snapped off, many power poles were snapped
at their base that caused numerous power outages, especially in Monett. Also, numerous brick and wood
framed homes, trailers, outbuilding, barns and other structures were severely damaged, completely destroyed
or sustained minor damage. This tornado was worse than others in terms of damage and destruction.
6) Now pick another tornado and provide similar information about that event—in particular, the
level, width,
length, duration, any injuries and fatalities, extent of damage.
To find information, go to the site out of Purdue
University
https://mrcc.purdue.edu/gismaps/cntytorn.htm
.
Limit the time to 21
st
century tornadoes by
filtering the years to 2000 to 2021.
Then look for an EF5 tornado path (hint: check states like Oklahoma, Texas,
Alabama, Mississippi, Kansas). Click on the start of the tornado path (the arrow at one end of the tornado
path) to get the information for this event. Then look up the tornado (e.g. Wikipedia or simply Google a
location and date) to get more details on the extent of damage, injuries, etc.
May 25th, 2008. EF5, 2100 yds, 40.97 miles, 1 hours 2 mins, 9 fatalities 70ish injuries, extent of damage was “A
third of the town experienced devastating damage with nearly 200 homes destroyed millions of dollars of
damage.
Section 2:
Tornado Frequency
Tornadoes occur across much of the United States, primarily the central and eastern States.
The distribution
and frequency of tornadoes—of any strength or EF rating—varies with space and time.
Here you’re going to
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
test the hypothesis that the location of most common tornadoes shifts from south to north and back south
during the year, in response to shifts in the jet stream (farther south in the winter, farther north in summer).
The National Weather Service has compiled maps of monthly tornado frequency for the period 1989-2013
here
.
Use these maps to answer the following questions.
1.
What states have the most frequent tornadoes in (a) winter (Dec-Feb)
Texas and Mississippi
, (b) spring
(Mar-May)
Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas (Midwest)
, (c) summer (Jun-Aug)
Middle States and Florida
, and
(d) fall (Sep-Nov)
Texas, Florida, Oklahoma, Mississippi
?
2.
Which season(s) has/have the most frequent tornadoes?
Spring
3.
How does the location of the most frequent tornadoes shift during the year?
Do the data support the
hypothesis described above?
Goes north-Midwest late spring – early summer, shifts south late summer
early fall. Does support the hypothesis above, spring has the most tornadoes.
4.
Florida is also a tornado “hot spot”.
When are tornadoes most frequent there?
Most frequent late
summer-fall
Why?
They occur from an aftermath of hurricanes.
The frequency of tornadoes also varies year to year, as shown in the maps
here
.
Is there any correlation
between the frequency of tornadoes and the impacts of El Niño and La Niña events in the Pacific?
Construct a
table or spreadsheet with:
(a) whether tornado occurrence in the year was relatively low, medium, or high; (b)
the geographic distribution of tornado frequency for each year -- greater concentration of tornadoes in the
north, central, or southern third of the country; (c) column showing if the year had an El Niño or La Niña event.
1.
What criteria did you use to characterize the relative frequency of tornadoes?
a.
When the numbers were…: 1-20=high, 21-40=med, 41-60=low
2.
What states/areas do you describe as north, central, or south?
b.
North: Washington, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, lowa, Wyoming,
Idaho, Oregon, New York, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania, New England.
c.
Central: California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Kentucky, West
Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina
d.
South: Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida
3.
Do years of high tornado frequency correlate with either El Niño or La Niña events (see table on next
page)?
With strong or weak events?
What about years of low tornado frequency?
a.
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Tornado vs La/El Niñ(a/o) Frequency
Tornado Occurrence Intensity (out of 3)
Tornado Location
El Niño / La Niña intensity
Intensity of EL/LA Quantified
Yeah, there’s a correlation between those kinds of events and tornados.
4.
Does the distribution of tornadoes correlate with either strong El Niño or La Niña events?
In other words,
do years of greater concentration of tornadoes in the south correlate with strong or weak El Niño or La
Niña years?
What about years when tornadoes are more concentrated in the north or center?
a.
According to the data, it seems as though the Southern region had a stronger correlation between
high frequency and strong events.
5.
What conclusion, if any, can you draw about the relationship between El Niño and La Niña and the
frequency and distribution of tornadoes?
a.
When there’s a La Niña or a El Niño event there is a high likelihood of there being a tornado as well.
El Niño
La Niña
Weak - 12
Moderate - 7
Strong - 5
Very Strong - 3
Weak - 10
Moderate - 5
Strong - 7
1952-53
1951-52
1957-58
1982-83
1954-55
1955-56
1973-74
1953-54
1963-64
1965-66
1997-98
1964-65
1970-71
1975-76
1958-59
1968-69
1972-73
2015-16
1971-72
1995-96
1988-89
1969-70
1986-87
1987-88
1974-75
2011-12
1998-99
1976-77
1994-95
1991-92*
1983-84
2017-18
1999-00
1977-78
2002-03
1984-85
2007-08
1979-80
2009-10
2000-01
2010-11
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2008-09
2014-15
2016-17
2018-19
2019-20