geology lab materils (4)
jpg
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Wilfrid Laurier University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
101
Subject
Geology
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
jpg
Pages
1
Uploaded by MasterGoldfishMaster998
€
The
San
Francisco
Bay
area
of
California
is
located
in
a
tectonically
active
region,
so
it
can
be
subjected
to
strong
earthquakes.
Figure
11.3A
is
a
map
showing
the
kinds
of
geologic
materials
upon
which
buildings
have been
constructed
in
a
portion
of
Oakland
at
the
west
end
of
the
Oakland
Bay
Bridge.
These
materials
include
hard
compact
Pliocene
and
older
rock,
Quaternary
alluvial
sand
and
gravel
in
coastal
terrace
deposits,
a
sandy
alluvial
formation
called
the
Merritt
Sand,
and
an
uncompacted
artificial
fill
that
is
mostly
mud.
The
artificial
fill
was
used
in
the
late
19th
and
early
20th
centuries
to
create
a
seaport
in
an
area
that
was
originally
dominated
by
tidal
flats
and
creeks.
Imagine
that
you
have
been
hired
by
an
insurance
company
to
assess
the
geologic
risks
in
buying
newly
constructed
apartment
buildings
located
at
X,
Y,
and
Z
in
Fig.
11.3A.
Your
job
is
to
rank
the
risk
of
property
damage
during
strong
earthquakes
at
the
three
sites,
ranging
from
/ow
(little
or
no
damage
expected)
to
high
(damage
can
be
expected).
The
only
thing
that
you
have
as
a
basis
for
reasoning
is
Fig.
11.3A
and
knowledge
of
your
experiments
with
models
in
part
A
of
this
activity.
1.
Which
site
has
the
highest
risk
of
damage
during
a
future
earthquake?
Why?
2.
Which
site
has
the
lowest
risk
of
damage
during
a
future
earthquake?
Why?
D
On
October
17,
1989,
a
strong
earthquake
occurred
at
Loma
Prieta,
California,
and
shook
the
entire
San
Francisco
Bay
area.
Seismographs
temporarily
placed
at
locations
S1,
S2,
and
S3
(Fig.
11.3A)
after
the
main
shock
recorded
the
shaking
of
a
significant
aftershock,
and
the
resulting
seismograms
that
show
north—south
horizontal
motion
are
given
in
Fig.
11.3B.
More
intense
shaking
is
indicated
by
the
larger
amplitude
of
the
seismic
trace,
which
diverges
more
from
the
midline
of
the
seismogram.
The
records
in
Fig.
11.3B
show
that
the
intensity
of
shaking
was
less
at
location
S1
than
at
locations
S2
or
S3.
1.
The
Loma
Prieta
earthquake
caused
little
significant
damage
at
location
X,
but
there
was
moderate
damage
to
buildings
at
location
Y
and
severe
damage
at
location
Z.
For
example,
the
double-deck
portion
of
I-880
collapsed
between
points
C1
and
C2,
causing
many
deaths
(Figs.
11.2
and 11.3A),
and
was
damaged
but did
not
collapse
between
C2
and
C3.
Explain
how
this
damage
report
compares
to
your
risk
assessment
in
part
C.
2.
The
Loma
Prieta
earthquake
shook
the
entire
San
Francisco
Bay
region.
Yet
Fig.
11.3
provides
evidence
that the
earthquake
had
very
different
effects
on
structures
located
quite
near
to
each
other.
Explain
how
the
properties
of
geologic
material
on
which
buildings
are
constructed
(for
example,
strong
versus
weak
or
compacted
versus
uncompacted)
influence
how
much
the
buildings
are
shaken
in
an
earthquake.
E
REFLECT
&
DISCUSS
Imagine
that
you
are
an
elected
member
of
the
city
council
in
one
of
the
cities
around
San
Francisco
Bay.
Name
two
actions
that
you
could
propose
to
decrease
the
damaging
effects
of
future
earthquakes
in
your
community,
such
as
the
damage
that
occurred
at
locations
Y
and
Z
in
the
Loma
Prieta
earthquake.
300
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help