_Module 6 Second Class Activity - Science and Scientific Hypotheses
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Kansas *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
105
Subject
Geography
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
Pages
4
Uploaded by CoachSummerStarling36
DeFever, Camden
Module 06, Activity 02
GEOG 104: Principles of Physical Geography
Science and Scientific Hypothesis
Exploring the Scientific Method
The
scientific method
is a process that scientists use to better understand the world around them. It includes making
observations and asking a question, forming a hypothesis, designing an experiment, collecting and analyzing data,
and drawing a conclusion. This is sometimes also referred to as scientific inquiry. A hypothesis is a possible
explanation for an observation. A good scientist will design a controlled experiment to test their hypothesis.
In a controlled experiment, only one variable is tested at a time. It is called the manipulated or independent variable.
The experimental group will test the independent variable. The control group will be left alone, so you have something
to compare your results to. The variable that determines the data is the responding, or dependent variable. It
responds to the manipulated variable. All other variables in the experiment should remain the same, because if you
change more than one variable, you will not know which variable explained your results. Once something has been
tested many different times by many different scientists, it can become a scientific theory. It is different from a
scientific law, which describes what will happen every time under a particular set of conditions.
Part 1.
Read through the following scenarios. Identify the control group, the experimental group, the independent variable,
and the dependent variable.
Scenario
Independent
Variable
Dependent
Variable
Experimental
Group
Control Group
A company wants to test a new
dog food that is supposed to help
overweight dogs lose weight. 50
dogs are chosen to get the new
food, and 50 more continue their
normal diets. After one month, the
dogs are checked to see if they lost
any weight.
What type of
food the dog
eats
The dog's
weight
The dogs that
eat the new
dog food
The dog eats a
regular diet
A new sunscreen has been
developed that is supposed to be
more effective at preventing
sunburn. 30 participants spray one
arm with the new formula, and
spray the other arm with the
leading formula. After 4 hours in
the sun, their skin is evaluated for
any redness.
The new
sunscreen
Skin redness
Arm with the
new formula
Arm with the
leading formula
A student wants to study the effect
of sunlight on plant growth. In his
experiment, 12 plants receive
normal amounts of sunlight, but
half of them are kept under bright
sun lamps all night long. After 6
weeks, the plants’ heights are
measured.
The amount of
light the plants
get
Height of
plants
The plants
that get extra
light
The plants get
normal light
Part 2.
Scientific Method In Action – The Strange Case of BeriBeri
In 1887 a strange nerve disease attacked the people in the Dutch East Indies. The disease was beriberi. Symptoms of
the disease include weakness and loss of appetite, victims often died of heart failure. Scientists thought the disease
might be caused by bacteria. They injected chickens with bacteria from the blood of patients with beriberi. The
injected chickens became sick. However, so did a group of chickens that were not injected with bacteria.
One of the scientists, Dr. Eijkman, designed a new experiment based on his own observations. Before the
experiment, all the chickens had eaten whole-grain rice, but during the experiment, the chickens were fed polished
rice. Dr. Eijkman researched this exciting case and found that polished rice lacked thiamine, a vitamin necessary for
good health.
State the question or problem that Dr. Eijkman investigated.
-
The problem is nerve disease attacked the people in the Dutch East Indies
What was the original hypothesis?
-
The original hypothesis was that bacteria caused the disease.
What were the manipulated (independent) and responding (dependent) variables?
-
Injected chickens with bacteria - the chickens injected got sick, and so did the chickens
not injected.
Write a statement that summarizes the results of the experiment.
-
Dr. Eijkman discovered that the chickens were fed rice different from their normal diet,
and because of that, the chickens lacked thiamine, an essential vitamin they need to be
healthy. This made it clear a lack of thiamine causes the disease.
How would Dr. Eijkman test his new hypothesis?
-
The disease is caused by a diet lacking in thiamine.
________________________________________
Scientific Method In Action – How Penicillin Was Discovered
In 1928, Sir Alexander Fleming was studying Staphylococcus bacteria growing in culture dishes. He noticed that a
mold called Penicillium was also growing in some of the dishes. A clear area existed around the mold because all
the bacteria that had grown in this area had died. In the culture dishes without the mold, no clear areas were present.
Fleming hypothesized that the mold must be producing a chemical that killed the bacteria. He decided to isolate this
substance and test it to see if it would kill bacteria. Fleming transferred the mold to a nutrient broth solution. This
solution contained all the materials the mold needed to grow. After the mold grew, he removed it from the nutrient
broth and then added the broth to a culture of bacteria. He observed that the bacteria in the culture died. Fleming's
experiments were later used to develop antibiotics.
State the question or problem that Fleming investigated.
-
A mold was growing in some of the scientist’s dishes and killing some bacteria.
What was Fleming's hypothesis?
-
The mold was producing a chemical that killed the bacteria in the dishes.
How was the hypothesis tested?
-
It was tested by isolating the Penicillium and putting it in a nutrient broth solution.
Write a statement that summarizes the results of the experiment.
-
The solution led the mold to grow, and after it did, the broth was added to the bacteria.
By doing this, it killed the bacteria.
Part 3.
How Can a Causal Question Be Answered?
Examine the flow chart below which considers a question about water evaporation. Multiple hypotheses are tested
and conclusions drawn from the given results of the experiments.
Answer the following questions.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
What are the independent and dependent variables in each of the experiments?
-
#1 Independent - water stored at different temperatures - Dependent - water evaporated
-
#2 Independent - water placed in front of a fan - Dependent - water evaporated
-
#3 Independent - water under different lights - Dependent - water evaporated
What information should be added to the diagram to give the reader a better
understanding of how these experiments were conducted?
-
How much water they started with, the time of the experiment
What variables should have been CONTROLLED in the experiments?
-
Amount of water, a beaker with no changed temperature, fan, or ordinary light.
How much confidence would you have in the conclusion of experiment 3 if you found out
that temperature was not a controlled variable? Explain your reasoning.
-
I still have the same confidence in the conclusion of experiment 3 because the
temperature is not the independent variable.