Water_Lab (1)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Portland State University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
210
Subject
Geography
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
7
Uploaded by JudgeHornet3726
Lab 2: Watersheds and Water Quality
In this week’s lab, you will be exploring watersheds, stream characterization, and water quality
using a set of online interactive tools, graphs, and references. You will be working in small
groups during your regularly scheduled lab time and be able to ask questions to your TA as you
navigate the assignment.
Deliverable:
You will turn in a complete document with answers to the following 10 bolded
questions. When writing up your deliverable, please include the question and your associated
answer below it in blue. Be sure to answer each part of the 10 questions and write your answers
in complete sentences. Although you will be working through answers within groups and in-class,
your answers must be written by you and each student must submit their own document. When
you are finished, upload your assignment as a PDF or Word doc to the assignment drop box on
Canvas by midnight the day before your lab. This lab is worth 10 points.
Part I: Watersheds
(5 questions, 5 points)
We will introduce the following links in class to get you started
●
http://www.washingtonnature.org/fieldnotes/two-minute-takeaway-what-is-a-
watershed
●
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pwW2rlGIa8
●
https://www.epa.gov/waterdata/hows-my-waterway
Instructions:
A. Go to this link to view how watersheds connect in the USA
http://watersheds.fernleafinteractive.com/
Search for Region Pacific Northwest and zoom in Take note of upstream (red), and downstream (blue)
locations. Hover your cursor over the Columbia River, just north of Portland. Now hover the cursor over
the Sandy River (between Portland and Mt. Hood, south of the Columbia River).
1a. What do you notice about the size of the upstream area in either case? Why do you think this is?
Locate the Great Basin on the map (hint it’s in Nevada). Hover the cursor around this area.
1b. What do you notice about the downstream areas, does the water flow to the ocean? Why do you
think that is?
Go to this link to view a streamflow map of the United States:
https://waterwatch.usgs.gov/index.php?id=ww_past
Change the time period to 28 days, and the year to 2015 (leave today’s month and day).
Take note of the values in the Pacific Northwest.
2.
Are the flow values generally above or below normal?
Now change the year to 2016.
3.
How do the values of streamflow differ in 2016 from 2015 in the
Pacific Northwest, why do you think this changes year to year?
Observe and compare the (2) graphs below which represent surface water runoff (in some
cases floods following rain events or, in some cases, show the effects of ocean tides on rivers).
Surface water Peak streamflow for Bull run river
(In Northern extent of Columbia River watershed)
Surface water Peak streamflow for Beaver Creek
(In Southern extent of Columbia River watershed)
4. a. On the Bull Run graph, is the rate of increase quick (sharp peaks) or gradual
(rounded or low peaks) between years (HINT: connect the dots)?
4. b. On the Beaver Creek graph, is the rate of increase quick (sharp peaks) or
gradual (rounded peaks) between years? (HINT: connect the dots)?
5. Which year has the highest peak streamflow, and which has the lowest for each
of the graphs? Why do you think the Bull run graph is different from the Beaver
Creek (some examples; size, qualities, flooding, elevation and watershed size when
comparing)? Google search for more information about each stream to help
answer the question.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Part II: Stream characterization and water quality
(5 questions, 7 points)
Open Google Earth and take a look at Balch Creek, along the Lower Macleay trail in Forest Park.
We will be visiting Balch Creek on our second field trip. This lab uses data collected from Balch
Creek. Balch Creek is a tributary of the Willamette River, and flows north from the West Hills of
Portland. The stream is 5.6km in length and drains 9.1km2. Most of the watershed is located
within the urban forest with park and natural area use, but there is development in the upper
portion of the basin (BES 2010).
Read the following background information:
Water temperature controls the rates of biological and chemical processes, and is a
fundamental component to water quality. Higher temperatures may increase algae
populations, which may lead to uncontrolled blooms that deplete the water of oxygen
content (IPCC 2007). Therefore water temperature and dissolved oxygen are highly, and
inversely, correlated. Temperature-sensitive aquatic species may not be able to survive in
water outside of a certain temperature range and without enough dissolved oxygen.
Land use change, in the form of urban intensification, may lead to increased air and
stream temperatures (Paul and Meyer 2001). This is because land use practices directly
affect habitat and water quality by influencing the chemical and physical nature of
streams. As land is developed, the amount of impervious surface increases and more
water runs off the land instead of infiltrating into the soil, carrying pollutants to nearby
water bodies. Forests and undeveloped land adjacent to streams help protect water
quality and habitat by filtering pollutants from runoff waters. Vegetated buffers may also
provide shade during summer months and protect stream life from higher temperatures,
as well as prevent sediment loading in the stream by controlling erosion. Additional
complexities down the trophic cascade can also affect the physical and chemical nature
of streams; e.g. disproportionally high pressure of large herbivores (e.g. deer, elk) can
significantly alter the abundance, and hence the shade that riparian vegetation
provides. Such impacts have been studied in areas where top predators (i.e. wolves,
mountain lion) were removed from the landscape; e.g. Yellowstone, Banff, and Yosemite
National Parks. Across Forest Park, invasive plants, particularly English ivy, English
holly, and Himalayan blackberry, can reduce diverse, native plant communities to
indistinct monocultures of a single or few groundcover or shrub species. When invasive
plants are not controlled, the resulting lack of floristic diversity is particularly
detrimental to arthropod diversity, but it is likely to have broad negative impacts on the
distribution and abundance of vertebrate wildlife too (PP&R 2012)
Now you will graphically examine the relationships among air temperature, water
temperature, and dissolved oxygen that we have plotted for you (see below), using real
datasets from Balch Creek.
Stream characterization refers to collecting accurate information that may be used to
determine the extent and severity of pollution problems, as well as to guide decisions
about specific strategies for remediating waterways and locating systems for water
quality improvement (Skousen and Mains 1997). This may include water quantity and
quality measurements, macroinvertebrate sampling, assessment of watershed and
riparian land use/cover, soil composition and structure, or other parameters of interest to
the researcher.
Water quality is a measure of the suitability of water for a particular use based on
selected physical, chemical, and biological characteristics (USGS 2001). The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for establishing and regulating
nationwide standards for water quality.
In this section you will examine relationships among variables. The graphs below show the
relationship between air and water temperatures, and the set on the right show water
temperature and dissolved oxygen. Each graph displays a pattern that represents the type of
relationship that the variables share. In general, there are three types:
Positive:
the relationship between the two variables is such that a change in one
variable is associated with a change in the other variable, in the same direction.
Negative:
the relationship between the two variables is such that a change in one
variable is associated with a change in the other variable, in the opposite direction.
Unclear:
there is no discernible direction in the relationship between the two variables.
6
Graph questions
(4 questions, 4 points):
1. Using the graphs above, what is the relationship between water temperature and air
temperature (positive, negative, or unclear)?
(Hint: pick a line graph relationship listed below
and indicate why you think these variables have this relationship, also read background info and
draw a straight line on each graph, going through as many points as possible).
2. What is the relationship between water temperature and dissolved oxygen? Why do these
variables demonstrate this relationship?
3. These graphs show 12 years of data. If in the next 12 years air temperatures averaged
2˚C higher, how might water temperatures change? Do you think both graphs would be
equally affected? Explain.
4. If managers planted trees next to the streams to increase shading, how might dissolved
oxygen be affected in Balch creek? Explain.
Stream and riparian characterization questions
(1 question, 1 point)
:
For the purposes of this section, you will use stream characterization to gain an understanding of
the processes and patterns operating within each watershed. Make sure to review the material
provided and the references listed below; i.e. especially those by the Portland Parks and
Recreation Office (PP&R) to learn more about stream characterization and Balch Creek.
5. Develop three suggestions that watershed managers might employ to help improve water
quality in this watershed (other than the example provided in question four, “plant trees”).
References
City of Portland, OR, Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) and Brown & Caldwell. 1998. Fanno Creek
Resource Management Plan.
City of Portland, OR, Bureau of Environmental Services (BES). 2010. Westside streams water quality and
trend analyses status report.
Confalonieri, U., Menne B., Akhtar, R., Ebi, K.L., Hauengue, M., Kovats, R.S., Revich, B. and A.
Woodward. 2007. Human health. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution
of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
Cordy, G. E. 2001. A primer on water quality. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-027-01.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs-027-01/.
Paul, M. J. and J. L. Meyer. 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and the
Systematics 32: 333-365.
Portland Parks and Recreation (PP&R). 2012. Forest Park Wildlife Report.
https://www.portlandoregon.gov/parks/article/427357
Portland Parks and Recreation (PP&R). 2007. Riparian Habitat Conditions Assessment Report of Balch
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Creek. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=155700
Skousen, J. and C. Mains. 1997. Watershed characterization handbook for streams impacted by acid mine
drainage (You can’t judge a stream by its color). Presented at the Acid Mine Drainage Conference and the
National Coalition for Rural Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation, Pittsburgh, PA.
US EPA. 1997. Volunteer stream monitoring: A methods manual. US EPA Office of Water: Washington,
D.C. EPA 841-B-97-003.