Soil Erosion Homework Solution

pdf

School

Purdue University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

325

Subject

Geography

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

5

Uploaded by AdmiralWasp3805

Report
Soil Erosion Homework Solution September 26, 2021 Question 1 What is the soil loss for up and downslope farming in Indianapolis, IN with a slope length of 180 m? What will be the soil loss if the field is terraced with a horizontal spacing of 24 m, assuming the cover management conditions remain unchanged? Assume and the soil is a Lewisburg soil and a continuous corn/soybean rotation with spring conservation tillage and a slope of four percent. Solution Part 1 - Erosion from hillslope with minimal conservation practices First solve for the hillslope with no conservation practices in place. Use these variables to estimate missing values required for USLE, $ A = R K L S C P $. The variables R, K and P are already defined, but we will need to estimate L, S and C, using the following equations: L = ( l 22 ) b (1) b = sin θ sin θ + 0 . 269( sin θ ) 0 . 8 + 0 . 05 (2) So b = 0.36, and L = 2.14. For slopes greater than 4 m long, and steepness less than 9% use equation 7.8a: S = 10 . 8 sin θ + 0 . 03 (3) So S = 0.46. Answer: The annual erosion from this hill slope is 29.87 Mg/ha Part 2 - Impact of terracing on erosion {-} In the second part of the problem, we consider the same hill slope but with 24 m terraces. One of the effects of terraces is that the slope length is shortened to the terrace spacing. This means that we need to recompute the L factor, though not the b exponent since the angle of the overall slope does not change. Additionally the P factor will change to reflect terracing. So L = 1.03 for the terraced field. Answer: The annual erosion from the terraced hill slope is 4.75 Mg/ha . 1
Question 2 Use the Forest Service Internet site ( forest.moscowfsl.wsu.edu/fswepp/ ) to estimate the road erosion and sediment delivery for a road located near Flagstaff, Arizona, for a graveled road segment that is 250 m long, with a gradient of 5%, a 4-m long fillslope with a steepness of 50%, and a 35-m long buffer with a steepness of 40%. The width of the road is 5 m and the soil is a sandy loam. Compare the runoff and erosion from a rutted road to a road that is maintained to be outsloped. Solution Compare results: rutted, unmaintained road should have more erosion and more sediment leaving the buffer. Actual numbers will depend on what parameters they picked for the final submission. Two sample results are provided for reference. Maintained Road Rutted Road 2
Question 3 On a 60-m long slope, what is the relative difference in water erosion between slopes of 2 and 10%, assuming other factors are constant (compare USLE equations and WEPP Internet interfaces; milford.nserl.purdue.edu )? Solution From USLE: The factors L and S are affected when slope changes, but all other factors are constant. Variable Low Slope High Slope Comment Slope Length 60 m 60 m given Slope (percent) 2 10 given Slope (m/m) 0.02 0.10 converted from given slope Slope Angle (rad) 0.020 0.100 computed from given slope Slope Factor 0.246 1.172 From Eqn 7.8b or 7.8c depending on slope angle b 0.245 0.518 From Eqn 7.7b, assuming similar rill and interrill erosion Length Factor 1.278 1.682 From Eqn 7.7a A (Mg/ha) 0.31 1.97 Assume all other factors = 1, since they will not change Change in erosion A = 1.66 increase ton/acre/year. Answer: So erosion increases by a factor of 6.4. From WEPP 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Note: Actual answer will vary based on what factors are selected for the base case, changing the slope should lead to an increase in erosion. Example for a 2% slope: • Annual average soil loss = 0.7 ton/acre/year Example for a 10% slope, all other factors stay the same: 4
• Total soil loss 1.3 ton/acre/year Change in erosion A = 0.6 ton/acre/year. Answer: So erosion increases by a factor of 1.8. 5