CLAIM
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Memorial University of Newfoundland *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1050
Subject
Geography
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by BrigadierWaterBuffaloMaster2709
1.
CLAIM: Make a claim about whether global population is the greatest threat to
global sustainability. 1pt
While global population does play a role in global sustainability, it is not the
greatest threat to global sustainability.
2.
REASON: Give a reason for your claim. 1 pt
It is not a growing population that is the problem, it is the total consumption
done by a population, whether its growing or not.
3.
EVIDENCE and WARRANT: Provide two pieces of evidence for your claim,
including the contexts (warrants) that explain how that evidence is proof of the
reason and claim. Assume the reader has not read everything you have. 2pts
1.
Evidence 1: The places that are increasing in population, are not the
places that have the highest consumption of fossil fuels, which is a major
threat of global sustainability. As Dr. Joel Finnis, Associate Professor of
Geography at MUN, states, “Where the population is growing right now,
the average consumption rate in those countries is much smaller as they
are living a more sustainable lifestyle and haven’t benefited from past
consumption of fossil fuels” (Forecast NL, 2021), such as more
developed countries have.
2.
Evidence 2: Increases in industrialism, fuel consumption and e-waste are
major threats to global sustainability. The developed nations (ex: Canada
and the United States) simply have more access to the fuel and the e-
waste that industrialism produces.
4.
CLAIM: Make a claim about the relationship between population and carbon
inequity. 1 pt.
There is a relationship between population and carbon inequity.
5.
REASON: Give a reason for your claim. 1 pt.
a small portion of the global population is responsible for a significant portion of
cumulative emissions, resulting in a highly unequal distribution of carbon
emissions.
6.
EVIDENCE and WARRANT: Provide two pieces of evidence for your claim,
including the contexts (warrants) that explain how that evidence is proof of the
reason and claim. Assume the reader has not read everything you have. 2pts
1.
Evidence 1:
onsumption and carbon emissions tend to be higher in wealthy
individuals and nations than in less developed nations and individuals.
he
richest 10% of the world’s population (c.630 million people)
were responsible for 52% of the cumulative carbon emissions, while
the poorest 50% (c.3.1 billion people) were responsible for just
7% of cumulative emissions
(Gore, 2020-carbon inequity reading).
2.
Evidence 2: The carbon footprint left behind since the beginning of
“fossil finance” is currently contributing to the climate crisis. Fossil fuels
account for more than 75% of greenhouse gas emissions globally, and
almost 90% of carbon dioxide emissions (Shoemaker,2023). These effect
are harming the present day population by causing deaths due to
increases air pollution (1-in-5 deaths) and putting pressure on them to fix
it.
1.
CLAIM: Make a claim about how the overpopulation myth (the idea that global
population is a great threat to the global environment) is an issue of inequity.
One way to think of inequity is as the unfair distribution of unevenness
(thinking back to the unit on unevenness and scale). 1pt
The overpopulation myth is an issue of inequity based on the unevenness of
blame.
REASON: Give a reason for your claim. 1pt
The overpopulation myth creates a unfair distribution of blame for climate crisis on
populations of lower status and higher growth.
EVIDENCE and WARRANT: Provide two pieces of evidence for your claim,
including the contexts (warrants) that explain how that evidence is proof of the reason
and claim. Assume the reader has not read everything you have. 2pts
1.
Evidence 1:
current population establishment
s over-reliant on long-
acting reversible contraception (LARC)
2.
Evidence 2:
These
solutions can be superficial, let the biggest polluters off the hook, and further
exacerbate inequalities. As
do “solutions” stemming from privatization of land and water which deepen
inequalities by benefiting
corporations instead of small-scale farmers.
We call for a social justice
approach to supporting
people and the planet
Liboiron, Max. (2014).
Against Awareness, for Scale: Garbage is infrastructure, not behaviour
. Discard Studies
Blog.
https://discardstudies.com/2014/01/23/against-awareness-for-scale-garbage-is-
infrastructure-not-behavior/
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help