A1
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
KASB Institute of Technology, Karachi (Main Campus) *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
211
Subject
Geography
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
23
Uploaded by ChancellorGuineaPigMaster740
TITLE
Table of Contents
Abstract
................................................................................................................................
4
Background
..........................................................................................................................
5
Overview of the Current Market
......................................................................................
5
Identification of the Gap in the Market
...........................................................................
5
Main Candidate Ideas
......................................................................................................
6
Initial Evaluation
.................................................................................................................
6
Brainstorming and Ideation Process
................................................................................
6
Evaluation Table
..............................................................................................................
7
Final Business Idea: Sustainable Urban Farming Venture
...........................................
8
Candidate Idea 1: Mobile Farmers' Market
.................................................................
8
Candidate Idea 2: Food Waste Reduction App
............................................................
8
Scores and Reasoning behind Selecting the Urban Farming Venture
.............................
9
Market/Industry
.................................................................................................................
10
Detailed Analysis of the Urban Farming Market and Industry
......................................
10
Key Factors Driving the Urban Farming Market
...........................................................
11
Examination of Trends, Opportunities, and Challenges in the Urban Farming Sector..11
Trends and Opportunities
...........................................................................................
11
Challenges
..................................................................................................................
11
Sustainable Practices and Technological Advancements in Agriculture
...................
12
Competition
.......................................................................................................................
13
Overview of the Competitive Landscape in the Urban Farming Industry
.....................
13
Analysis of Existing and Potential Competitors
............................................................
14
Existing Competitors
.................................................................................................
14
Potential Competitors
................................................................................................
14
Unique Selling Points and Strengths against Competitors
............................................
15
Unique Selling Points
................................................................................................
15
Strengths against Competitors
...................................................................................
15
Pricing
................................................................................................................................
16
Estimation of the Pricing Structure
................................................................................
16
Produce Pricing
..............................................................................................................
16
Related Services Pricing
....................................................................................................
17
Justification for Value-Based Pricing
............................................................................
17
Analysis of the Pricing's Competitiveness in the Market
..............................................
17
Conclusion
.........................................................................................................................
18
References
..........................................................................................................................
19
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Abstract
This article presents a business plan for a sustainable urban farming operation as a
reaction to the growing demand for produce that is freshly grown and obtained locally in urban
areas. The organization intends to apply vertical farming techniques and make use of cutting-
edge technology in order to make the most effective use of their resources and maximize their
efficiency. Before closing with some comments on the research's potential and applicability, the
report discusses a variety of subjects, including market size, segmentation, competitive analysis,
price, and feasibility. Afterwards, it offers some perspectives on the report's potential and
applicability.
Background
Overview of the Current Market
There is a growing need for locally grown food as the global urban population continues
to rise. People in urban areas value easy access to nutritious and sustainably produced food
options (Reynolds & Nevin Cohen, 2016). However, conventional agricultural methods have
difficulty meeting rising demand due to issues like a lack of suitable land, inefficient
transportation options, and lengthy supply chains that risk lowering food quality and having
unfavorable impacts on the natural environment (Saha & Eckelman, 2017). The demand for
sustainably farmed, organic, locally sourced produce is high among city dwellers. They are also
learning to consider the repercussions of their food choices on society and the environment. As a
result, there is a growing interest in supporting local farmers by purchasing organic, locally
grown food that also helps reduce negative effects on the environment and strengthens
communities (Yoshida & Yagi, 2021).
Identification of the Gap in the Market
Even though there is a growing need for fresh food in urban settings, few viable options
exist for meeting that demand that are both convenient and environmentally friendly. As
traditional agriculture struggles to keep up with the rapid pace of urbanization, supply chain
logistics and the timely transportation of goods from rural areas to cities become more
challenging (Rogus & Dimitri, 2014). The environmental impact of long-distance transportation,
especially greenhouse gas emissions, is also becoming an increasing issue for environmentally
conscious consumers. The quest for eco-friendly and economical answers has created an
opportunity for innovative business owners (Weidner et al., 2019).
To address the aforementioned gap in the market, the suggested business would launch a
sustainable urban farming operation (Lohrberg et al., 2016). The company's mission is to use
innovative vertical farming technologies to grow food in urban areas. This strategy decreases
carbon emissions and the need to ship commodities long distances while guaranteeing a steady
supply of fresh, locally farmed produce (O’Hara & Toussaint, 2021). The sustainable agriculture
ideas that the urban farming enterprise seeks to disseminate include water conservation, climate
control, and organic cultivation. Customers who care about the environment will appreciate the
organization more because of its dedication to sustainability (Lohrberg et al., 2016).
Main Candidate Ideas
One idea is the "Mobile Farmers' Market," a market that travels from neighborhood to
neighborhood in cities, selling fresh food grown by local farmers and urban gardeners. The idea's
potential to close food deserts was limited by its inability to scale, the complexity of its
implementation, and the unpredictability of the weather. The second runner-up idea was the Food
Waste Reduction App, which proposed making a smartphone app that would connect people with
leftover food from restaurants, grocery stores, and other places. While this idea had the best of
intentions, it required the participation of multiple parties and was hampered by regulations.
Initial Evaluation
Brainstorming and Ideation Process
In order to develop the most effective business plan possible, a collection of business
owners and industry experts gathered together for a series of brainstorming and ideation sessions
to work on a solution (Duvernoy et al., 2018). There was a significant amount of study conducted
on the tastes of consumers, newly developing technology, and the agriculture and food markets
in general (Al-Kodmany, 2018). This study places a strong emphasis on sustainable agricultural
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
practices in urban areas, and one of the driving factors for this emphasis is the rising demand for
fresh vegetables. A number of concepts were conceived after the requirements of the market and
the preferences of the target audience were taken into consideration. Several subjects, including
food distribution, recycling, composting, and urban gardening, were discussed during this event.
The developed ideas were put through a battery of rigorous evaluations, during which they were
assessed for their marketability, scalability, influence on the environment, and distinctiveness
(Kodali & Valdas, 2018).The concepts that were chosen went through a process of further
development, which included the creation of strategies and plans for putting the ideas into action.
We took into account the technical features of the solutions, as well as the resources they would
need and any potential issues they might present (Duvernoy et al., 2018). When evaluating the
developed concepts, the group gave careful consideration to the market potential, levels of
competition, customer interest, financial sustainability, and potential social impact (Benke &
Tomkins, 2017).
Evaluation Table
Using the evaluation table that was provided in Task 1 of Workshop 4, we came to the
conclusion that the sustainable urban farming enterprise was the most promising of the three
potential business ideas (the other two being the Mobile Farmers' Market and the Food Waste
Reduction App). There were seven different criteria that were employed in order to give each
suggestion a score between one and five, with one being the lowest possible score and five being
the highest possible score. The criteria or evaluation includes
Market Demand and Potential
Competitive Landscape
Environmental Impact
Scalability and Growth Opportunities
Resource Requirements
Technological Feasibility
Social Impact and Sustainability
Final Business Idea: Sustainable Urban Farming Venture
CRITERIA
SCORE
Market Demand and Potential
5
Competitive Landscape
5
Environmental Impact
5
Scalability and Growth Opportunities
4
Resource Requirements
4
Technological Feasibility
4
Social Impact and Sustainability
5
Candidate Idea 1: Mobile Farmers' Market
CRITERIA
SCORE
Market Demand and Potential
3
Competitive Landscape
3
Environmental Impact
3
Scalability and Growth Opportunities
3
Resource Requirements
2
Technological Feasibility
3
Social Impact and Sustainability
4
Candidate Idea 2: Food Waste Reduction App
CRITERIA
SCORE
Market Demand and Potential
4
Competitive Landscape
3
Environmental Impact
4
Scalability and Growth Opportunities
3
Resource Requirements
3
Technological Feasibility
5
Social Impact and Sustainability
4
Scores and Reasoning behind Selecting the Urban Farming Venture
The practice of urban farming was given excellent marks in several major areas,
including those assessing its influence on the environment, its potential market demand, its social
impact, and its ability to be sustained. With more people becoming aware of the need of
preserving the natural world and the rising demand for nutritious food in urban areas, now is an
excellent time to launch this business. Long-term success can be attributed, in part, to the fact
that the company adhered to the farming practices chosen by clients who were concerned about
the environment and political issues. The urban farming business was assigned a score of 4,
which reflects the typical amount of rivalry from other companies. Before the introduction of
vertical farming and other cutting-edge technical breakthroughs, there were prospective
competitors and suppliers of conventional agriculture in the urban farming market. Vertical
farming is a more recent innovation. The urban farming enterprise was given a score of 4 on a
scale that measured its potential for expansion and scalability. Vertical farming systems have
been able to grow to service several cities as a result of its scalability, which enables them to
make optimum use of limited urban space. The committee gave the required resources a rating of
4, however they did note that the initial investment in a vertical farming system and
accompanying technology could be costly. But the proposal was more tempting in general when
considering its long-term benefits, which included reduced reliance on public transportation and
less wastage of resources. A score of 4 was given for the practicability of the urban farming idea
from a technological standpoint. The development of "smart agriculture," sometimes referred to
as vertical farming, is now possible thanks to the progress that has been made in technology.
After much debate and taking the evaluation scores into consideration, the group came to the
conclusion that an urban farming enterprise would be the most successful option. It was the most
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
appealing and viable solution because it had a high degree of market demand alignment,
favorable environmental and social impact, moderate competition, and scaling potential. The
idea of urban farming had a compelling value proposition because it had the ability to
simultaneously address the increasing requirements of urban customers by supplying them with
food that was sustainably grown and sourced locally. In other words, it had the potential to
provide urban customers with food that was cultivated in an environmentally responsible
manner.
Market/Industry
Detailed Analysis of the Urban Farming Market and Industry
Rapid growth and revolutionary change in the urban farming business have been fueled
by the increasing demand for sustainably grown and locally produced food in metropolitan areas.
"Urban farming" refers to the practice of cultivating crops and/or keeping livestock in an urban
setting (Kodali & Valdas, 2018). There are many upsides to this practice, including year-round
access to locally grown veggies and reduced food miles and shipping costs.
Key Factors Driving the Urban Farming Market
People in cities are becoming increasingly concerned about the environmental impact of
the food they buy. Companies involved in urban farming can now benefit from the growing
consumer interest in food that is both fresh and locally farmed (Ghadiri Masoum et al., 2017).
The growing environmental consciousness of consumers has created a demand for products from
urban farms. Because it requires fewer natural resources and produces less carbon dioxide than
conventional farming, urban farming contributes to environmental preservation (Clendenning et
al., 2015). Maintaining a rural way of life in metropolitan areas is challenging due to the decline
in farmland as a result of urbanization. Urban farming uses unorthodox technologies like
hydroponics, vertical farming, and rooftop gardens to overcome this challenge (Lucan et al.,
2015).
Examination of Trends, Opportunities, and Challenges in the Urban Farming Sector
Trends and Opportunities
The higher output and decreased footprint offered by vertical farming have led to the
method's rise in popularity. This newfound innovation aids corporations engaged in urban
farming in making the most of vacant city lots (Specht et al., 2016). The Internet of Things (IoT)
enables the use of sensors and data analytics, opening the door to the possibility of real-time
monitoring and automation of urban farms. Smart agricultural technology reduce costs, improve
crop quality, and simplify operations for farmers (O’Hara & Toussaint, 2021). The number of
urban farms that partner with adjacent restaurants and grocery stores has increased recently. By
working together, we can strengthen direct supply chains, which in turn reduces food waste and
boosts public engagement (Ghadiri Masoum et al., 2017).
Challenges
Small business owners may find it difficult to invest in urban farming systems due to the
high expense of getting started, especially when innovative tools are required. Space constraints
are a major challenge for urban farming, especially in densely populated cities (Szumigała &
Szumigała, 2018). It might be challenging to find locations for urban farms that are both
economical and practical. Vertical farming and controlled environment agriculture have the
potential to considerably increase energy consumption if not optimized for the use of artificial
lighting and climate control. Some people may be resistant to urban farming solutions like
rooftop gardens and vertical farms in urban settings because of their aesthetic and visual impacts
(Specht et al., 2016).
Sustainable Practices and Technological Advancements in Agriculture
Sustainable Practices
Water rich in nutrients is used to water the plants growing without soil. A system that
combines hydroponics with fish farming to use fish waste as a nutrition source for plants is
called aquaponics (Weidner et al., 2019). Since organic farming relies on renewable resources
and forgoes the use of synthetic chemicals, it appeals to health-conscious shoppers who are also
concerned about the environment. Urban farms can benefit greatly from composting since it
allows them to recycle organic waste while also producing nutrient-rich soil amendments
(Thomaier et al., 2014).
Technological Advancements
By integrating sensors and other IoT devices, environmental conditions and nutrient
levels can be monitored in real time, allowing for more precise and effective crop management.
Massive amounts of data collected from sensors and historical records can be analyzed by AI-
driven analytics to enhance farming practices, anticipate crop yields, and discover faults
(Yoshida & Yagi, 2021). Planting, watering, and harvesting are all time-consuming tasks that can
be simplified with automation in urban farming. The use of LED lighting systems has
revolutionized the indoor farming industry because they consume a fraction of the energy
required by conventional lighting while still providing sufficient illumination (Weidner et al.,
2019).
Competition
Overview of the Competitive Landscape in the Urban Farming Industry
The urban farming industry has increased and diversified as more people in cities become
aware of the positive effects on their health that can result from consuming food that is grown
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
locally. This has resulted in a more dynamic and vibrant competitive landscape, with several
firms offering a variety of urban farming tactics (Allegaert et al., 2020). As a result of this, the
market for agricultural products has become more saturated. The following is a list of the most
successful businesses operating in the urban farming sector:
Vertical farming is a way of raising plants indoors that involves stacking them in layers or
using vertical structures. These businesses have made vertical farming their primary focus.
In order to achieve the highest possible levels of productivity and efficiency, they usually
make use of cutting-edge technologies such as hydroponics and LED lighting (Dimitri et al.,
2016).
Commercial Farming on Rooftops utilizes urban areas and the tops of buildings as growing
spaces for various crops. They give the locally grown commodities a competitive advantage
by taking advantage of the open area and sufficient sunshine that is available (Allegaert et
al., 2020).
People come together to grow food for themselves and their neighbors through the use of
community gardens and other forms of urban agriculture. The teaching of farming practices
that are sustainable and the formation of community are two typical goals of such
undertakings (Cohen & Reynolds, 2014).
The success of urban agriculture is dependent on the existence of businesses that specialize
in "smart farming" technology. These technologies include sensors connected to the Internet
of Things (IoT), data analytics, and automation solutions (Benke & Tomkins, 2017).
There is a growing need for product that is supplied locally, and conventional agricultural
suppliers and distributors might enter the market for urban farming in order to satisfy this
demand (Cohen & Reynolds, 2014).
Analysis of Existing and Potential Competitors
Existing Competitors
The Urban Farming Company is a well-established vertical farming enterprise that has a
sizable presence in a number of the country's most important cities (Dimitri et al., 2016). They
are able to provide consistently high-quality goods throughout the year as a result of the diverse
array of plants that they grow in greenhouses that are kept at a constant temperature and
humidity (Kodali & Valdas, 2018). A well-known company that farms on rooftops, City Greens,
has forged partnerships with a wide variety of restaurants and grocery stores in the area to ensure
that these enterprises have access to a consistent supply of fresh produce (Ghadiri Masoum et al.,
2017). Customers who are concerned about the environment will appreciate their focus on food
that is farmed in the immediate area. IoT Farms Solutions is a technology business that
specializes in the provision of intelligent agriculture solutions (Duvernoy et al., 2018). These
solutions include a complete suite of Internet of Things (IoT) devices as well as analytics
software designed expressly for urban farming (Duvernoy et al., 2018). There are many different
configurations for urban farming that they supply, some of which include rooftop gardens and
vertical farms (Ghadiri Masoum et al., 2017).
Potential Competitors
Green Urbanity is a startup company that is in its early stages with the lofty objective of
delivering revolutionary AI-driven automation in the field of urban farming (Lucan et al., 2015).
They may have gained a competitive advantage as a result of their attempts to automate
processes in order to reduce labor costs and increase output (Lohrberg et al., 2016). Small farms
will be established in various spots across the city as part of a community-led initiative in urban
agriculture. The project's objectives are to reduce the expenses of producing food and to boost
participation from the local population (Kodali & Valdas, 2018).
Unique Selling Points and Strengths against Competitors
Unique Selling Points
In Advanced Vertical Farming Techniques, we will use ways of vertical farming that are
at the cutting edge of technology and will be designed with efficiency and lifespan in mind.
Through the use of vertical farming, a business can maximize the use of each and every square
foot of available urban land (O’Hara & Toussaint, 2021). The company will merge sensors
connected to the Internet of Things (IoT), data analytics software, and automation technology in
order to perform real-time monitoring and management of farming conditions (Lucan et al.,
2015). This "smart farming" technique improves crop control and productivity while requiring
fewer resources to produce the same amount of food. The indoor temperature control system
makes it possible to continue harvesting throughout the year, ensuring a consistent supply of
fresh fruit and vegetables regardless of the weather or any other elements that are associated with
the changing of the seasons (Mincyte & Dobernig, 2016).
Strengths against Competitors
In contrast to firms that specialize in vertical farming or rooftop farming, this company
will provide customers with access to a diverse selection of locally grown food options, such as
leafy greens, herbs, and microgreens. Because of the company's dedication to environmentally
friendly practices, such as organic farming, water conservation, and leaving a reduced carbon
footprint, it has a competitive advantage over other businesses in the industry (Rogus & Dimitri,
2014). The company will be able to run more efficiently, make greater use of its resources, and
continue producing high-quality items if it adopts cutting-edge technology, giving it a
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
competitive advantage over rivals that do not do so(Reynolds & Nevin Cohen, 2016).
The
company plans to build ties with local restaurants, grocery stores, and community organizations
in order to promote a circular economy and encourage community involvement. This will also
help the company meet its goal of reducing waste (O’Hara & Toussaint, 2021).
Pricing
Estimation of the Pricing Structure
Prices for the sustainable urban farming company's commodities and services will be
determined so that they are reasonable for the company's clients while still allowing it to turn a
profit over the course of its existence (Siegner et al., 2018). The price of a product will be based
on a variety of different elements, including as the cost of manufacturing, the degree of demand
for the product, the level of competition in the market, and the perceived value that consumers
place on the product (Rogus & Dimitri, 2014).
Produce Pricing
The price of the final product is determined by factoring in the costs of the seeds,
fertilizers, water, energy, and labor that went into producing it (Szumigała & Szumigała, 2018).
The use of cutting-edge agricultural practices, such as vertical farming and the use of smart
farming technologies, will also be considered into the total cost structure. Because the company's
objective is to increase revenue through the sale of a diverse range of fresh, locally grown items,
it intends to establish varying prices for the many types of crops it sells (Siegner et al., 2018). It
is possible that leafy greens and herbs, which can be grown rapidly and inexpensively in vertical
farms, will be priced lower than goods that are either more specialized or seasonal. The
fluctuations in the company's revenue during the year will be reflected in the pricing adjustments
made by the company. Prices have the potential to go up when demand is great but could go
down when there is an abundance of a good or service (Specht et al., 2016).
Related Services Pricing
The organization will participate in community outreach activities and offer educational
programs at prices that are affordable for the purpose of demonstrating its commitment to
environmentally responsible business practices (Rogus & Dimitri, 2014). This strategy reflects
the company's commitment to innovation, technical growth, and ecologically responsible
business practices, all of which are important to the organization (Szumigała & Szumigała,
2018). Instead than basing prices on production costs plus a markup, as is done with cost-plus
pricing, value-based pricing takes into account how much customers value a product or service.
This can be in contrast to cost-plus pricing, which bases prices on production costs alone
(Thomaier et al., 2014).
Justification for Value-Based Pricing
Fresh veggies produced close to home are gaining popularity among city people as a
result of their superior flavor, numerous health benefits, and positive influence on the
surrounding environment (Thomaier et al., 2014). A value-based pricing strategy allows the
company to capitalize on the way consumers feel about their products by charging higher prices
for those things that consumers perceive to be of higher quality (Pulighe & Lupia, 2020). The
company stands out from its rivals thanks to its dedication to environmentally friendly practices
and forward-thinking agricultural methods. It is possible that the business will make an effort to
justify its investments in vertical farming equipment and intelligent farming solutions by setting
the prices of its products and services in a manner that is acceptable to the company's consumers
(Rogus & Dimitri, 2014).
Analysis of the Pricing's Competitiveness in the Market
The prices will be examined from a variety of perspectives to ensure that they are
reasonable in the market.
The company intends to look at the pricing strategies used by other urban farming
businesses. The company intends to keep their prices competitive by conducting an
analysis of the costs of regular farms, vertical farms, and rooftop farms that are in
competition with them (Al-Kodmany, 2018).
The company is able to ensure that the prices it offers appropriately reflect its unique
selling features by employing a pricing strategy that is founded on the concept of value.
Some of the company's unique selling factors include its commitment to environmental
preservation, the agricultural practices it pioneers, and the educational initiatives it
undertakes. If the company communicates to its customers the value that they may expect
from their purchase, the company will have a stronger case for the reasonableness of its
prices (Allegaert et al., 2020).
The pricing structure will be evaluated by the input from customers as well as the
acceptability from the market. Finding out how competitive your price is can be
accomplished through the use of consumer surveys, focus groups, and a test run with a
representative sample of your target population(Weidner et al., 2019).
The firm is going to make regular assessments of its cost structure in order to guarantee
that its pricing are both sustainable and lucrative. Price shifts in manufactured goods can be
caused by major swings in the cost of energy and other inputs, which may need
manufacturers to make adjustments (Yoshida & Yagi, 2021).
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Conclusion
In conclusion, the increased demand for meals that are both good for the environment and
appropriate for the region, the urban farming industry is expected to experience explosive
expansion in the near future. Because of its emphasis on novel vertical farming methods, smart
farming integration, and environmentally friendly farming practices, the proposal is in line with
current market trends and the requirements of individual customers. Because they maximize
yields while reducing the amount of labor needed to produce them, modern farming practices are
economically viable. In addition, utilizing a pricing strategy that is based on the concept of value
can assist a business in remaining competitive in the market while at the same time maximizing
revenue from the sale of its goods and services. The tremendous potential of the sustainable
urban farming program is shown by the expanding demand for locally sourced vegetables that
have been grown in a sustainable manner in urban environments. The project is primed for
success in the rapidly expanding urban farming industry and to contribute to a healthier and
greener urban environment thanks to its well defined business strategy, value-based pricing, and
emphasis on innovation and sustainability. In addition, the project is well positioned to make a
contribution.
References
Al-Kodmany, K. (2018). The Vertical Farm: A Review of Developments and Implications for the
Vertical City.
Buildings
,
8
(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8020024
Allegaert, S., Wubben, E. F. M., & Hagelaar, G. (2020). Where is the business? A study into
prominent items of the Vertical Farm Business Framework.
European Journal of
Horticultural Science
,
85
(5), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.17660/ejhs.2020/85.5.6
Benke, K., & Tomkins, B. (2017). Future food-production systems: vertical farming and
controlled-environment agriculture.
Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy
,
13
(1),
13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2017.1394054
Clendenning, J., Dressler, W. H., & Richards, C. (2015). Food justice or food sovereignty?
Understanding the rise of urban food movements in the USA.
Agriculture and Human
Values
,
33
(1), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9625-8
Cohen, N., & Reynolds, K. (2014). Resource needs for a socially just and sustainable urban
agriculture system: Lessons from New York City.
Renewable Agriculture and Food
Systems
,
30
(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170514000210
Dimitri, C., Oberholtzer, L., & Pressman, A. (2016). Urban agriculture: connecting producers
with consumers.
British Food Journal
,
118
(3), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-06-
2015-0200
Duvernoy, I., Zambon, I., Sateriano, A., & Salvati, L. (2018). Pictures from the other side of the
fringe: Urban growth and peri-urban agriculture in a post-industrial city (Toulouse,
France).
Journal of Rural Studies
,
57
, 25–35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.10.007
Ghadiri Masoum, M., Rezvani, M. R., & Cheraghi, M. (2017). Case Study: Analysis of Factors
Affecting Sustainable Food Security Rural Households: Zanjan Township.
Journal of
Rural Research
,
7
(4), 658–671. https://doi.org/10.21859/jjr-07045
Kodali, R. K., & Valdas, A. (2018, August 1).
MQTT Based Monitoring System for Urban
Farmers Using ESP32 and Raspberry Pi
. IEEE Xplore.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGCIoT.2018.8752995
Lohrberg, F., Cost, & Al, E. (2016).
Urban agriculture Europe
. Jovis.
Lucan, S. C., Maroko, A. R., Sanon, O., Frias, R., & Schechter, C. B. (2015). Urban farmers’
markets: Accessibility, offerings, and produce variety, quality, and price compared to
nearby stores.
Appetite
,
90
, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.034
Mincyte, D., & Dobernig, K. (2016). Urban farming in the North American metropolis:
Rethinking work and distance in alternative food networks.
Environment and Planning
A: Economy and Space
,
48
(9), 1767–1786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x16651444
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
O’Hara, S., & Toussaint, E. C. (2021). Food access in crisis: Food security and COVID-19.
Ecological Economics
,
180
, 106859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106859
Pulighe, G., & Lupia, F. (2020). Food First: COVID-19 Outbreak and Cities Lockdown a
Booster for a Wider Vision on Urban Agriculture.
Sustainability
,
12
(12), 5012.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125012
Reynolds, K., & Nevin Cohen. (2016).
Beyond the kale : Urban agriculture and social justice
activism in New York City
. The University Of Georgia Press. C.
Rogus, S., & Dimitri, C. (2014). Agriculture in urban and peri-urban areas in the United States:
Highlights from the Census of Agriculture.
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
,
30
(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170514000040
Saha, M., & Eckelman, M. J. (2017). Growing fresh fruits and vegetables in an urban landscape:
A geospatial assessment of ground level and rooftop urban agriculture potential in
Boston, USA.
Landscape and Urban Planning
,
165
, 130–141.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.015
Siegner, A., Sowerwine, J., & Acey, C. (2018). Does Urban Agriculture Improve Food Security?
Examining the Nexus of Food Access and Distribution of Urban Produced Foods in the
United States: A Systematic Review.
Sustainability
,
10
(9), 2988.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10092988
Specht, K., Weith, T., Swoboda, K., & Siebert, R. (2016). Socially acceptable urban agriculture
businesses.
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
,
36
(1).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0355-0
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Szumigała, P., & Szumigała, K. (2018). Urban Farming – The Ecological, Spatial and Social
Factors of Urban Landscape Transformation.
Economic and Regional Studies / Studia
Ekonomiczne I Regionalne
,
11
(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2018-0016
Thomaier, S., Specht, K., Henckel, D., Dierich, A., Siebert, R., Freisinger, U. B., & Sawicka, M.
(2014). Farming in and on urban buildings: Present practice and specific novelties of
Zero-Acreage Farming (ZFarming).
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
,
30
(1), 43–
54. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170514000143
Weidner, T., Yang, A., & Hamm, M. W. (2019). Consolidating the current knowledge on urban
agriculture in productive urban food systems: Learnings, gaps and outlook.
Journal of
Cleaner Production
,
209
, 1637–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.004
Yoshida, S., & Yagi, H. (2021). Long-Term Development of Urban Agriculture: Resilience and
Sustainability of Farmers Facing the Covid-19 Pandemic in Japan.
Sustainability
,
13
(8),
4316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084316
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help