Guidant – JNJ - BSX-2004 (1)
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
New York University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
3196
Subject
Finance
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
Pages
14
Uploaded by CorporalMorning7259
1
Guidant – Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific 12/7/2004:
Rumor
of JNJ-GDT merger talks.
P
GDT
: $72.35, +$3.60, +5.2
%. S
GDT
= $
22B
.
P
JNJ
: $60.41, -$1.42, –
2.3
%. S
JNJ
= $
180B
. GDT
: cardiovascular devices – heart defibrillators, pacemakers, stents, etc. Market size: $10 B.
12/15/2004: J&J announces an agreement to acquire Guidant for $76/share
, valued at $
23.9B (the equity value only). “Under the agreement, Guidant common stock will be exchanged for $30.40
in cash and $45.60
in J&J common stock, so long as the average J&J price is between $55.45
and $67.09
during the 15-days trading period ending three days prior to the transaction closing.” (TheStreet.com, 12/16/2004). Deal awaits regulatory approval. JNJ: 30%-35% of stent market, GDT: 20%.
Break-up
(termination) fee: $750m from GDT to JNJ, $700m
from JNJ to GDT.
Prices
: GDT
JNJ
BSX
12/14
71.00
61.43 35.88
12/15
72.05
60.90 36.49
12/16
71.70
63.45 35.47 4/27/2005: GDT SHs approve the deal.
11/2005: Regulatory approval
granted with conditions – sale of some lines.
2
Earlier …
5/24/2005: (NY Times:) Guidant did not
tell patients or doctors about a flaw in one of its defibrillators.
7/1/2005: GDT announces a recall
of some defective cardio devices. Malfunctions linked to four deaths; lawsuits against GDT. Rumors: GDT delayed
in disclosing the information to doctors.
Later: Regulatory investigation into GDT’s past disclosure
practices. 11/2/05: JNJ demands restructuring
of the deal. “J&J believes these events had a material adverse effect
on Guidant.” (The contract includes a MAC
or MAE
provision.)
JNJ
will break
the acquisition agreement if terms are not altered. Also, in Q1/2005 – GDT net income increases, but in Q2/2005 and Q3/2005 –
income declines below
Q4/2004 level. From 11/1 to 11/3, GDT drops 9% to $57.57
. Was $72.80
on 12/31/2004 and $72.38 on 10/17/2005.
3
11/7/2005: GDT sues
JNJ not
to break the contract. Commentators: given the precedents, the law is on Guidant side
, but J&J has better facts than others in the past. 11/15/05: J&J agrees to buy GDT for $21.5B
, $
63.08
/shr.
Terms: $33.25
cash, $29.83
in 0.493 JNJ shares. Agreement needs to be approved
again by GDT SHs, January 31 vote. GDT price jumps from $57.90 to $62.50, +$2.06B
.
J&J price +3.3% +$6.2 B
. New termination
fee: $
705m
from GDT to JNJ. 12/5/2005: Boston Scientific
offers to buy GDT for cash & stock (1/2), $72
/shr. Deal to close by Q1/2006. Offer has collar
(between $23.60 - $28.86 of BSX price). BSX will divest
some of GDT business to gain regulatory approval (still in question).
Value: About $23B
.
Analysts: JNJ can respond by (1) increasing the cash part, (2) have one-way collar
with the down side guaranteed, (3) expedite closing. GDT price: $67.98, +10%.
BSX price: $26.35, –3.6%.
Merrill, Bank of America agree to lend $7B each. This debt to be paid by 2009.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
BSX will sell
GDT’s drug-coated stent and catheter units to Abbott
Labs (ABT)
for $4.1 B
+ borrow from Abbott $0.9B
at 4% + sell about 4% of the joint company (about 56m shrs) for $1.4B
, total $6.4B.
(How does ABT know how much to pay??? See later…)
BSX will borrow $8.5B
from banks, which agreed to lend up to $14B.
Now, S
BSX
= $20.7B, D
BSX
= $2.5B.
1/11/06: GDT
accepts JNJ’s offer of $68.06
(> $63.08 but < $72, BSX offer).
$37.25 cash + $30.81 stock (0.493 JNJ shares @ $62.50)
P
JNJ
= $62.21 (declines), value of offer = $67.92.
P
GDT
= $
70.44
(+$1.05). 1/13/06: BSX raises its offer to $73
. Sets deadline today 4pm for GDT to decide between offers.
Add’l features: 1)
Price raised daily if a deal doesn’t close by 3/31 (about $4.5m a day).
2)
BSX commits to divest all overlapping assets.
5
1/14/2006: GDT accepts a new JNJ bid, $71
.
$40.52 cash + $30.48 (0.493 JNJ shares).
GDT SHs call for management to accept BSX higher offer.
P
GDT
= $70.84 (1/13).
1/17/2006: BSX raises its offer to $80
($42 c+ $38 s) ($27.2B
cash = $14B)
Lower end of collar
reduced from $23.62 to $22.62.
Cash part will rise daily @6% annual rate after April 1 until closing.
P
GDT
= $76.22 (
+8.2%
). P
BSX = $23.90 (
– 5.2%
).
GDT states acceptance
. BSX gives GDT a deadline, 1/25. GDT gives JNJ a deadline, 1/24.
1/25/2006: JNJ will not raise
its bid. Says it would not be in the best interest of its SHs.
GDT accepts BSX offer
of $
80
. (Effective Cost: $82 because of TF). Requires SH approval in both
firms.
Requires regulatory
approval.
BSX plans to become “world leader in cardiovascular devices.”
P
GDT
= $75.30 (–1.9%). P
BSX = –1.7%. P
JNJ
= –1.7%.
6
1/26/2006: The FDA sends BSX a warning
letter on “serious regulatory problems” at three of its facilities.
BSX price drops.
BSX’s stock offer, $38, includes a collar.
Lower range at P
BSX = $22.62
.
Info in SEC filing: breakup fee of $
800m
(both ways). On 1/30, P
BSX
= $20.90. P
GDT
= $72.26.
2/1/2006: Regulatory approval
of the deal is not
guaranteed because of BSX’s regulatory problems with the FDA.
Analysts: JNJ
may come back
with a higher offer
than its previous $71/shr if BSX price falls significantly. (Bus. Week).
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
7
2/6/2006: BSX filed notification with the DoJ and the FTC of its intention to acquire GDT. GDT also files its notification.
BSX reimbursed GDT $705m
breakup fee paid by GDT to JNJ.
If the deal breaks up, GDT will have to reimburse BSX this amount. Info in filing: pro forma EPS estimated at $1.52-$1.66 for 2007
, $1.98-$2.17 for 2008, $2.24-$2.54 for 2009, $2.61-$3.02 for 2010 and $3.13-$3.59 for 2011
.
EPS, ttm: BSX -- $0.70. GDT -- $1.24.
Analyst: Regulatory
approval is uncertain
because Abbott – which buys the stent business – is a small player, BSX may have too much power.
2/13/2006: Moody’s downgrades BSX debt
, which will grow from $2B to $
9.6
B.
“Even if the deal is not completed, it signals BSX management’s intention to increase leverage.”
BSX will have to borrow roughly $9B.
3/20/2006: Institutional SH Service (ISS), a leading proxy advisory firm, recommends approval
of the BSX-GDT deal. SH meeting scheduled for 3/31.
GDT rises to $78.82 (+1.2%).
3/23/2006: BSX makes antitrust commitments to the European commission to resolve potential antitrust issues.
3/27/2006: EU investigation may delay the closing of the deal.
8
3/31/2006: Merger is approved by SHs
of GDT (99%) and BSX (97%). Deal awaits antitrust
clearance in the U.S. and Europe. (Both granted in April.)
Analysts: BSX will not see earnings gain from deal until 2010.
4/21/2006: Closing
of both the merger and the ABT deal. The deal ends up being for $
78.88
/share, total value: $
27B
. (+$
705
breakup fee) S&P lowers the debt rating
of BSX from A to BBB+.
Moody’s and Fitch also lower their rating
of BSX’s debt.
Late 6/2006: BSX recalls
50,000 Guidant’s cardiac devices. It could take two years to fix its safety problems.
9/21/2006: BSX issues a profit warning
.
Since offer in 12/2005, BSX lost 46%.
JNJ
offer would be higher
(if its stock price were unaffected).
BSX CEO spends two days a week at GDT HQs fixing problems and containing damage.
9
9/27/2006: J&J sues
BSX, GDT and ABT for $5.5 billion in damages. Claims: the three companies illegally shared information
on their way to scuttling GDT’s agreement to sell itself to J&J.
The winning bid and side deal (sale of the stent division to ABT) would not have been feasible if GDT had not allowed ABT to review proprietary information about the units that it later bought. GDT had no right to allow ABT such a review; it violated the “
no solicitation
” clause
in their agreement.
1-31-2007: BSX earnings fell 17% due to higher expenses related to its acquisition of GDT
.
2/1/2007: Moody’s affirms BSX debt as Baa3
but changes outlook to negative
.
7/25/2007: Moody’s downgrades
BSX debt from Baa3 to Ba2
(“junk”) as the company’s cash flow no longer supports comfortably its debt level. 8/3/2007: S&P’s, Fitch downgrade
BSX’s debt below
investment grade (junk).
BSX’s 5-year CDS
trade at 315
b.p. up 31% from 8/1. Was 51 b.p. a month ago.
Price of BSX bonds
: -3%
. Stock P
BSX
= $13.09, -2.5% (RM: -2%).
BSX debt: $9B
. Cash from operations in Q2: $211M
. BSX may need to use revolving credit.
Debt includes $5B
of bank
loans (taken to buy GDT). Variable rates
.
BSX has problems with sales of old GDT cardiovascular products
, and with its coated stents
. Potential lawsuits. BSX plans to sell 25% of its endo-surgery division, other assets.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
10
10/18/2007: BSX announces a layoff
of 2,300 employees (about 12% of its workforce) that will reduce its annual expenses by about $525M in 2008. It expects to cut its 2009 expenses by additional $25M-$50M.
Layoffs will result in pre-tax charge of $450-$475M.
BSX will sell
some of its operations, and will restructure and integrate some of its cardiac divisions.
BSX paid in July about $
195m
to settle law suits
tied to faulty defibrillators
.
Sales
of defibrillators and drug-coated stents declined
due to safety concerns. This led to the downgrading of bonds below investment-grade
status.
11/20/2007: BSX reports a Q3/2007 loss
.
EPS: -$0.18. But includes $0.29 charge related to the purchase of Remron Medical Technologies and planned divestitures
of some assets.
EPS Q3/2006: $0.05. Drug-coated stents’ sales dropped
22% (safety concerns).(
J&J sales fell by more
.) BSX market share rose to 56
%.
Implantable heart defibrillators’ sales rose 18% as Medtronic (a competitor) announced a recall
of its defibrillators. P
BS: +4.1% to $14.42. End of 2007
: BSX
stock capitalization: $
9.4B
. Debt: $8.2B. Cash: $1.2B. EBITDA (ttm): $2.2B.
11
9/2009: Research shows that Abbott
’s stent
(acquired from BSX, following the merger with Guidant) is superior
to that of BSX. ABT’s stent is leader
in market share.
9/29/2009: BSX
will pay $716M to JNJ
to settle 14 patent infringement lawsuits related to stents.
BSX’s capitalization: $16B. Debt: $6.3B. NI: -$2.3B. EBITDA: $2.1B.
BSX still faces problems with its acquisition of Guidant.
9/20/2010: BSX
acquires Asthmatx, a privately-owned medical-device maker to treat asthma and bronchial problems that are not solved by drugs. Deal will be dilutive to EPS until 2013. Deal consists of a $193.5m in cash + $250m which is dependent on revenue-
based milestones through 2019. (“Earnout” agreement.)
From day -1 to +2, P
BSX
rises by 3.7%
5/15/2014: BSX agrees to acquire Bayer’s division of intervention cardiovascular products for $
415m
in cash.
12
2/17/2015: BSX
will pay J&J $600m
to settle a $7B lawsuit. J&J accused Guidant of breaking that deal. (This is in addition to the $705m
breakup fee.)
JNJ’s lawsuit claimed that GDT violated the merger agreement – which allowed it to consider competing bids but not to solicit them -- by providing due diligence directly to Abbott, thus enabling BSX’s offer.
BSX’s capitalization: $22B
.
6-11-2018: Stryker (SYK) makes a takeover approach to BSX.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/11/boston-scientific-shares-halted-on-report-that-stryker-has-made-a-takeover-approach-for-company.html
S
SYK
: $65B.
S
BSX
: $48B.
SYK is a medical device company.
Earlier -- 10-28-2010 -- SYK acquired the neurovascular division of BSX $1.5B. 6-13-2018: SYK denies report it’s in talks to acquire BSX.
P
BSX
: 6-1: $30.59.
6-12: $33.84. 6-29: $
32.70.
(S&P500 – flat)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
13
12-1-2020: BSX to sell BTG Specialty Pharmaceuticals for $
800M
in cash to affiliates of European specialty pharmaceutical group SERB.
1-21-2021: BSX acquires Preventice Solutions
(privately-held) for $
925M
in cash
+ earnout
agreement -- up to an add’l $300M in a potential commercial milestone payment.
BSX holds 22
% of Preventice; the required outlay is $
720M
.
Preventice’s Sales in 2020: $158M.
Preventice offers mobile cardiac health solutions and services, ranging from ambulatory cardiac monitors (short and long-term Holter monitors) and cardiac event monitors and mobile cardiac telemetry.
P
BSX
: +2.3%, +$1.2B. S
BSX
= $
52B
. Acquisition completed on 3-2-2021.
3-3-2021: BSX will acquire Lumenis from an affiliate of Baring Private Equity Asia (BPEA) for $1.07B in Cash. Lumenis produces premier laser systems, fibers and accessories used for urology and otolaryngology procedures.
BSX: Lumenis’s laser technology, paired with our LithoVue Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope and kidney stone management portfolio, will enable execution of our strategy for our stone franchise.
The acquisition will expand our global footprint throughout Europe and Asia.
14
6-24-2021: BSX exercises Option to Acquire Farapulse, Inc.
BSX has invested in Farapulse since 2014. Holds 27% of the company.
Terms: $295M in cash (for 73%) + up to $92M upon achievement of certain clinical and regulatory milestones, and additional revenue-based payments for the next 3 yrs.
Related Documents
Related Questions
-)
Hanse, Incorporated, has the following two mutually exclusive projects available.
Year
0
Project R
-$ 47,000
Project S
-$ 71,000
17,000
1234
17,000
23,000
5
9,000
5,000
18,000
18,000
33,000
29,000
7,000
a. What is the crossover rate for these two projects?
Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.
b. What is the NPV of each project at the crossover rate?
Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.
S
a. Crossover rate
b. Project R
Project S
%
arrow_forward
5
Hanse, Inc., has the following two mutually exclusive projects available.
15:58
Year
012345
Project R
-$78,500
Project S
-$98,800
27,400
24,700
26,400
24,700
24,400
39,700
18,400
11,300
34,700
13,700
a. What is the crossover rate for these two projects? (Do not round intermediate
calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g
32.16.
b. What is the NPV of each project at the crossover rate? (Do not round intermediate
calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.)
a.
Crossover rate
b.
NPV Project R
NPV Project S
%
arrow_forward
Ch 5. ABC Company has the following mutually exclusive projects.
Year
Project A
Project B
0
-$19,520
-$16,800
1
11,500
9,500
2
8,750
7,100
3
2,500
3,500
If the company uses the Profitability Index to rank these two projects, which project should be chosen if the appropriate discount rate is 15 percent?
Group of answer choices
Project B
Both projects
Project A
Neither projects
arrow_forward
Compute the Pl statistic for Project Q if the appropriate cost of capital is 12 percent. (Do not round intermediate calculations and
round your final answer to 2 decimal places.)
Project Q
Time:
1
4.
Cash flow:
-$11,300
$3,500
$4,330
$1,670
$2,300
PI
Should the project be accepted or rejected?
O rejected
O accepted
...
MacBook Air
arrow_forward
Profitaility Index
Please solve for the profitiability index and explain. The information is attached.
** The previous person answered it incorrectly***
The only answer that was correct was Project B 1.5
PLEASE ENURE ACCURACY
arrow_forward
A firm with a WACC of 10% is considering the following mutually exclusive projects:
0
1
2
Project 1
-$250 $75
Project 2
-$400
$350
Which project would you recommend?
$75
$350
3
$75
$120
4
5
$165
$165
$120 $120
Select the correct answer.
Oa. Neither Project 1 nor 2, since each project's NPV 0.
Oc. Project 2, since the NPV₂ > NPV1.
Od. Both Projects 1 and 2, since both projects have IRR's > 0.
Oe. Project 1, since the NPV₁ > NPV2.
arrow_forward
Check
Compute the IRR statistic for Project F. The appropriate cost of capital is 13 percent. (Do not round intermediate calculations and
round your final answer to 2 decimal places.)
Project F
Time:
1
2
3
4
Cash flow:
-$12,000 $4,350 $5,180 $2,520 $3,150
IRR
%
Should the project be accepted or rejected?
O accepted
O rejected
MacBook Air
arrow_forward
Chec
Compute the Pl statistic for Project Z if the appropriate cost of capital is 6 percent. (Do not round intermediate calculations and round
your final answer to 2 decimal places.)
Project z
Time:
Cash flow:
1
3
4
5
-$1,500
$450
$580
$750
$400
$200
PI
Should the project be accepted or rejected?
O rejected
O accepted
arrow_forward
The Weiland Computer Corporation is trying to choose between the following mutually exclusive design projects, P1 and P2:Year 0123 Cash flows (P1) -$53,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 Cash flow (P2) -$16,000 9,100 9,100 9,100a. If the discount rate is 10 percent and the company applies the profitability index (PI) decision rule, which project should the firm accept?b. If the firm applies the Net Present Value (NPV) decision rule, which project should it take?c. Are your answers in (a) and (b) different? Explain why?
arrow_forward
Hanse, Incorporated, has the following two mutually exclusive projects available.
Project R
-$ 80,500
28,200
Project S
-$ 100,400
25, 100
25, 100
27,200
Year
0
1
2
3
4
25,200
19,200
10,900
40,100
35,100
14,100
a. What is the crossover rate for these two projects?
Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.
b. What is the NPV of each project at the crossover rate?
Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.
a. Crossover rate
b. NPV Project R
NPV Project S
%
arrow_forward
Please help with this question and work out by step cuz most responses are wrong
arrow_forward
6.43 Caroline received the analysis below from an employee concerning four revenue proposals.
Ai*, When
Compared with Proposal
Initial
Overall
Proposal Investment, S
i*, %
A
B
C
ABCD
-40,000
29
-75,000
15
-100,000
16
-200,000
14
564
916
7
10
13
20
225
12
a. If the proposals are independent, which one(s) should she select at MARR = 15.5% per year?
b. If the proposals are mutually exclusive, which one should she select at MARR = 10% per year?
c. If the proposals are mutually exclusive, which one should she select at MARR = 14% per year?
arrow_forward
need step by step answer
arrow_forward
How do I answer (c)?
arrow_forward
Your Question : Please introduction and correct and incorrect option explain!
arrow_forward
note : please you dont use excel.
arrow_forward
The answer is B but I don’t understand from where they got 36Mn and specially from where they got the 6mn?
please help clearly so that I can understand it. please explain in detail why other options are wrong
arrow_forward
A company is thinking of investing in one of two potential new products for sale. The projections are as follows:
Year Revenue/cost £ (Product A) Revenue/cost £ (Product B)0 (150,000) outlay (150,000) outlay 1 24,000 12,0002 24,000 25,3333 44,000 52,0004 84,000 63,333
Calculate the IRR for Product B only using 3% and 15% to 2 d.p.
arrow_forward
Can you show me how this is done?
Kepner Inc, is considering a capital investment project. that will provide annual cash flows of $31,248, requires an initial investment of $62,241, and the PV of cash flows is $106,796.
What is the profitability index of the project? Round your answer 2 decimal places
Selected Answer:
76
Correct Answer:
1.72 ± 0.01
arrow_forward
Nn1.
Account
arrow_forward
Please correct answer and don't used hand raiting
arrow_forward
Ch 5. ABC Company has the following mutually exclusive projects.
Year
Project A
Project B
0
-$19,520
-$16,800
1
11,500
9,500
2
8,750
7,100
3
2,500
3,500
If the company uses the NPV method to rank these two projects, which project should be chosen if the appropriate discount rate is 15 percent?
Group of answer choices
Project A
Project B
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3af85/3af85b2072752fa2ee75350776ed7516aa4b373d" alt="Text book image"
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Finance
ISBN:9781337514835
Author:MOYER
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Related Questions
- -) Hanse, Incorporated, has the following two mutually exclusive projects available. Year 0 Project R -$ 47,000 Project S -$ 71,000 17,000 1234 17,000 23,000 5 9,000 5,000 18,000 18,000 33,000 29,000 7,000 a. What is the crossover rate for these two projects? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16. b. What is the NPV of each project at the crossover rate? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16. S a. Crossover rate b. Project R Project S %arrow_forward5 Hanse, Inc., has the following two mutually exclusive projects available. 15:58 Year 012345 Project R -$78,500 Project S -$98,800 27,400 24,700 26,400 24,700 24,400 39,700 18,400 11,300 34,700 13,700 a. What is the crossover rate for these two projects? (Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g 32.16. b. What is the NPV of each project at the crossover rate? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) a. Crossover rate b. NPV Project R NPV Project S %arrow_forwardCh 5. ABC Company has the following mutually exclusive projects. Year Project A Project B 0 -$19,520 -$16,800 1 11,500 9,500 2 8,750 7,100 3 2,500 3,500 If the company uses the Profitability Index to rank these two projects, which project should be chosen if the appropriate discount rate is 15 percent? Group of answer choices Project B Both projects Project A Neither projectsarrow_forward
- Compute the Pl statistic for Project Q if the appropriate cost of capital is 12 percent. (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your final answer to 2 decimal places.) Project Q Time: 1 4. Cash flow: -$11,300 $3,500 $4,330 $1,670 $2,300 PI Should the project be accepted or rejected? O rejected O accepted ... MacBook Airarrow_forwardProfitaility Index Please solve for the profitiability index and explain. The information is attached. ** The previous person answered it incorrectly*** The only answer that was correct was Project B 1.5 PLEASE ENURE ACCURACYarrow_forwardA firm with a WACC of 10% is considering the following mutually exclusive projects: 0 1 2 Project 1 -$250 $75 Project 2 -$400 $350 Which project would you recommend? $75 $350 3 $75 $120 4 5 $165 $165 $120 $120 Select the correct answer. Oa. Neither Project 1 nor 2, since each project's NPV 0. Oc. Project 2, since the NPV₂ > NPV1. Od. Both Projects 1 and 2, since both projects have IRR's > 0. Oe. Project 1, since the NPV₁ > NPV2.arrow_forward
- Check Compute the IRR statistic for Project F. The appropriate cost of capital is 13 percent. (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your final answer to 2 decimal places.) Project F Time: 1 2 3 4 Cash flow: -$12,000 $4,350 $5,180 $2,520 $3,150 IRR % Should the project be accepted or rejected? O accepted O rejected MacBook Airarrow_forwardChec Compute the Pl statistic for Project Z if the appropriate cost of capital is 6 percent. (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your final answer to 2 decimal places.) Project z Time: Cash flow: 1 3 4 5 -$1,500 $450 $580 $750 $400 $200 PI Should the project be accepted or rejected? O rejected O acceptedarrow_forwardThe Weiland Computer Corporation is trying to choose between the following mutually exclusive design projects, P1 and P2:Year 0123 Cash flows (P1) -$53,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 Cash flow (P2) -$16,000 9,100 9,100 9,100a. If the discount rate is 10 percent and the company applies the profitability index (PI) decision rule, which project should the firm accept?b. If the firm applies the Net Present Value (NPV) decision rule, which project should it take?c. Are your answers in (a) and (b) different? Explain why?arrow_forward
- Hanse, Incorporated, has the following two mutually exclusive projects available. Project R -$ 80,500 28,200 Project S -$ 100,400 25, 100 25, 100 27,200 Year 0 1 2 3 4 25,200 19,200 10,900 40,100 35,100 14,100 a. What is the crossover rate for these two projects? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16. b. What is the NPV of each project at the crossover rate? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16. a. Crossover rate b. NPV Project R NPV Project S %arrow_forwardPlease help with this question and work out by step cuz most responses are wrongarrow_forward6.43 Caroline received the analysis below from an employee concerning four revenue proposals. Ai*, When Compared with Proposal Initial Overall Proposal Investment, S i*, % A B C ABCD -40,000 29 -75,000 15 -100,000 16 -200,000 14 564 916 7 10 13 20 225 12 a. If the proposals are independent, which one(s) should she select at MARR = 15.5% per year? b. If the proposals are mutually exclusive, which one should she select at MARR = 10% per year? c. If the proposals are mutually exclusive, which one should she select at MARR = 14% per year?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3af85/3af85b2072752fa2ee75350776ed7516aa4b373d" alt="Text book image"
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Finance
ISBN:9781337514835
Author:MOYER
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT