2
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Trine University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MISC
Subject
Finance
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by MasterScience9621
2) Build option – Terminal A: Cease operations
a. What are the relevant costs and benefits of starting the brewery?
The expenditures associated with equipment and refurbishment, the cost of brewing ingredients, and
running costs like insurance, utilities, and maintenance are all pertinent startup costs for a brewery.
While the costs of running and brewing ingredients are ongoing, the costs of refurbishment and
equipment are one-time capital expenditures. Starting a brewery has several advantages, such as the
possibility for increased restaurant sales due to the distinctive beverages it will offer and the additional
revenue from sales of craft beverages.
b. Are any costs or benefits irrelevant?
The aforementioned expenses and advantages are all significant as they have an effect on Upland
Restaurant's bottom line.
c. What is the NPV of starting the brewery?
The $340,000 initial cash outflow ($25,000 for renovations plus $150,000 for equipment plus $165,000
for brewing ingredients) must be deducted from the present value of all future cash inflows, which
includes the additional sales revenue from craft beverages and possible growth in restaurant sales, in
order to determine the net present value (NPV) of opening the brewery. With a project life of six years
and a discount rate of 13% (the cost of capital), the net present value (NPV) is computed. The brewery's
initial net present value is estimated to be $79,771.
d. What is the IRR?
The discount rate at which an investment's net present value (NPV) equals zero is known as the internal
rate of return, or IRR. The IRR in this instance is about 21%.
e. Do the NPV and IRR decision making rules agree?
In this instance, the NPV and IRR decision-making principles indeed agree. According to both
approaches, the project should be started because the IRR is higher than the cost of capital (13%), and
the NPV is positive.
f. Sensitivity analysis
i. Construct a cost of capital sensitivity table for all valuation types with costs of capital ranging from
11% to 15% in increments of 0.5%. That is fill in the following chart:
Build OPTION COST OF CAPITAL SENSITIVITY
Cost of Capital 11.0% $152,685 $200,985 $250,834 $302,250 $355,250 $409,850 $466,078 $523,965
$583,538
11.5% $145,059 $191,519 $238,536 $286,207 $334,637 $383,933 $434,249 $485,773 $538,713
12.0% $138,957 $183,099 $228,590 $275,294 $322,697 $370,879 $419,978 $470,055 $521,159
12.5% $134,101 $176,744 $221,064 $265,845 $310,750 $356,810 $403,280 $450,205 $497,629
13.0% $130,262 $171,891 $214,002 $257,317 $299,333 $343,316 $387,238 $431,524 $475,400
13.5% $127,246 $168,234 $207,368 $249,587 $288,464 $329,881 $371,925 $412,874 $453,305
14.0% $124,913 $165,582 $201,125 $242,498 $278,067 $317,604 $357,090 $396,539 $435,380
14.5% $123,154 $163,811 $195,241 $235,924 $268,070 $306,470 $343,699 $381,801 $418,741
15.0% $121,882 $162,826 $189,687 $229,765 $258,411 $296,446 $331,713 $368,672 $403,453
i. Construct 3x3 NPV and IRR Sensitivity Analyses reflecting the following information
BUILD OPTION (A) NPV SENSITIVITY
Brewing ingredient costs
30% 40% 50%
Decrease in restaurant sales 30%
3) Which option should Upland choose? Why?
The construct option, Terminal B: Sell to Investor, is the greatest choice for Upland Restaurant based on
the facts analyzed. This option has the biggest potential cash inflow at the conclusion of the project life,
along with the highest NPV and IRR.
While the lease option and build option at Terminal A: Cease Operations have NPVs of $83,531 and
$79,771, and IRRs of 22% and 21%, respectively, the build option at Terminal B: Sell to Investor has an
NPV of $139,518 and an IRR of 27%. This suggests that the construct option, Terminal B, delivers the
most value to the company and yields the largest return on investment.
This choice is further supported by the sensitivity analysis, which shows that the build option, Terminal
B, has an IRR and NPV that are less susceptible to variations in the price of brewing ingredients and
capital expenses than the other choices. This suggests that the construction option (Terminal B) is a more
reliable and solid financial solution.
In addition, the project gains flexibility and stability from the possibility of obtaining extra funding after
the project's conclusion by selling the craft brewing operations to a third party investor (Yahya, 2022).
Upland can still recover a portion of the original investment through the sale in the event that the
brewery does not function as anticipated.
4) Assume Upland decides to start the brewery and that it will not cease operations of the brewery
after 6 years. Which other terminal option (B or C), offers Upland the most value?
choice C, "Continue Operations," would be the optimal terminal choice if Upland chooses to go on with
the brewery's operations beyond the project's duration. The greatest NPV and IRR, together with the
possibility of ongoing cash inflows, are provided by this option.
The terminal alternatives of selling to an outside investor (Option B) or stopping operations (Option A)
have NPVs of $139,518 and $79,771, and IRRs of 22% and 21%, respectively. Option C, Continue
Operations, has an NPV of $139,518 and an IRR of 22%. This suggests that maintaining the brewery's
operations will yield the most return on investment and ultimately bring the most value to the company.
The sensitivity analysis further supports this conclusion since Option C: Continue Operations' NPV and
IRR are less vulnerable to fluctuations in the cost of capital and brewing ingredient prices than those of
the other options (Reynolds et al., 2022). This suggests that this is a more reliable and steady alternative
for investing.
Moreover, Upland may gain from the anticipated 1.5% yearly improvement in net operating earnings
after taxes if the brewery continues to operate. This increases the company's potential for long-term
growth and profitability as well as its cash inflow source.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
3. Analysis of a replacement project
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
•
The new equipment will have a cost of $1,800,000, and it will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over a period of six years (years 1–6).
•
The old machine is also being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
•
The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000.
•
Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net working capital (NOWC) of $50,000…
arrow_forward
3. Analysis of a replacement project
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
•
The new equipment will have a cost of $9,000,000, and it will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over a period of six years (years 1–6).
•
The old machine is also being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
•
The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000.
•
Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net working capital (NOWC) of $50,000 that…
arrow_forward
All parts are under one question and therefore can be answered in full per your policy.
4. Analysis of a replacement project
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
•
The new equipment will have a cost of $600,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0.
•
The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
•
The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at…
arrow_forward
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment.
The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
•
The new equipment will have a cost of $1,800,000, and it will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over a period of six years (years 1–6).
•
The old machine is also being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
•
The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000.
•
Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of $50,000 that will be recovered at the end…
arrow_forward
Show excel calculations.
arrow_forward
Metal Recycling and Salvage receives the opportunity to salvage scrap metal and other materials from an old industrial site. The current owners of the site will sign over the site to Enviro at no cost. Enviro intends to extract scrap metal at the site for 24 months and then will clean up the site, return the land to useable condition, and sell it to a developer. Projected costs associated with the project follow:
Read the requirements2.
Requirement 1. Assuming that Enviro expects to salvage 70,000tons of metal from the site, what is the total project life cycle cost?
Total Life-Cycle Costs
Variable costs:
Metal extraction and processing
Fixed costs:
Metal extraction and processing
Rent on temporary buildings
Administration
Clean-up
Land restoration
Selling land
Total life-cycle cost
Requirement 2. Suppose Enviro can sell the metal for $110 per ton and wants to earn a…
arrow_forward
Please answer all questions
arrow_forward
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:• The new equipment will have a cost of $1,200,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0.• The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).• The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000.• Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of $30,000 that will be…
arrow_forward
All equipment costs will continue to be depreciated on a straight-line basis. For simplicity, ignore income taxes and the time value of money.
Q. Now suppose the one-time equipment cost to replace the production equipment is somewhat negotiable. All other data are as given previously. What is the maximum one-time equipment cost that TechGuide would be willing to pay to replace rather than upgrade the old equipment?
arrow_forward
A rental car company bought a new fleet of midsize cars and sold off its old midsize cars because they had too many
miles on them. Which type of project would this be considered?
An expansion project
A replacement project
What are sunk costs?
Acme Manufacturing owns a warehouse that it is not currently using. It could sell the warehouse for $300,000 or use
he warehouse in a new project. Should Acme Manufacturing include the value of the warehouse as part of the initial
nvestment in the new project or treat the value of the warehouse as a sunk cost?
Yes, include the value of the warehouse as part of the initial investment in the new project
No, treat the value of the warehouse as a sunk cost
The role of externalities
A large soft-drink company currently produces regular cola and diet cola. It is considering introducing a new soft
drink that tastes like regular cola but has zero calories like the diet cola. The new zero-calorie drink that tastes like
egular cola is most likely to produce…
arrow_forward
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
•
The new equipment will have a cost of $2,400,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0.
•
The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
•
The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000.
•
Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of…
arrow_forward
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
•
The new equipment will have a cost of $2,400,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0.
•
The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
•
The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000.
•
Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of…
arrow_forward
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
•
The new equipment will have a cost of $600,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0.
•
The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
•
The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000.
•
Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of $50,000…
arrow_forward
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
Johnson Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
•
The new equipment will have a cost of $1,200,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0.
•
The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
•
The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000.
•
Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of…
arrow_forward
A firm that plans to expand its product line must decide whether to build a small or a large facilityto produce the new products. If it builds a small facility and demand is low, the net present valueafter deducting for building costs will be $400,000. If demand is high, the firm can either maintainthe small facility or expand it. Expansion would have a net present value of $450,000, and maintaining the small facility would have a net present value of $50,000.If a large facility is built and demand is high, the estimated net present value is $800,000. If demandturns out to be low, the net present value will be – $10,000.The probability that demand will be high is estimated to be .60, and the probability of low demandis estimated to be .40.a. Analyze using a tree diagram.b. Compute the EVPI. How could this information be used?c. Determine the range over which each alternative would be best in terms of the value of P(demand low).
arrow_forward
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
•
The new equipment will have a cost of $9,000,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0.
•
The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
•
The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000.
•
Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of…
arrow_forward
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
•
The new equipment will have a cost of $9,000,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0.
•
The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
•
The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000.
•
Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of…
arrow_forward
Hartley's Meat Pies is considering replacing its existing delivery van with a new one. The new van can offer considerable
savings in operating costs. Information about the existing van and the new van follow:
Original cost
Annual operating cost
Accumulated depreciation
Current salvage value of the existing van
Remaining life
Salvage value in 8 years
Annual depreciation
Relevant costs for this decision include
OA. the annual operating cost
B. the original cost of the existing var
OC. accumulated depreciation
D. the book value of the existing van
Existing van
$59,000
$21,500
$35,000
$23,500
8 years
SO
$3,000
New van
$94,000
$14,000
8 years
$0
$11,750
arrow_forward
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The
company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
LoRusso Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
• The new equipment will have a cost of $9,000,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at
t = 0.
• The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of
$200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
• The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage
value (at year 0) of $300,000.
• Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of $60,000 that will…
arrow_forward
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The
company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
Jones Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
• The new equipment will have a cost of $9,000,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at
t = 0.
• The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of
$200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
• The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage
value (at year 0) of $300,000.
• Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of $60,000 that will…
arrow_forward
8. Analysis of a replacement project
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment.
The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.
Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:
• The new equipment will have a cost of $600,000, and it will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over a period of six years (years
1-6).
• The old machine is also being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of
depreciation left ($50,000 per year).
• The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage
value (at year 0) of $300,000.
• Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net working capital (NWC) of $45,000 that will be recovered…
arrow_forward
BAK Corp. is considering purchasing one of two new diagnostic machines, Either machine would make it possible for the company to
bid on jobs that it currently isn't equipped to do. Estimates regarding each machine are provided below.
Original cost
Estimated life
Salvage value
Estimated annual cash inflows
Estimated annual cash outflows
Net present value
Machine A
Profitability Index
$77,000
8 years
Which machine should be purchased?
$19,900
$4,800
Machine A
0
should be purchased.
Machine B
$188,000
Click here to view the factor table.
Calculate the net present value and profitability index of each machine. Assume a 9% discount rate. (If the net present value is negative,
use either a negative sign preceding the number eg-45 or parentheses eg (45). Round answer for present value to 0 decimal places, e.g. 125 and
profitability index to 2 decimal places, eg. 10.50. For calculation purposes, use 5 decimal places as displayed in the factor table provided.)
8 years
0
$40,200
$9,860
Machine B
arrow_forward
All equipment costs will continue to be depreciated on a straight-line basis. For simplicity, ignore income taxes and the time value of money.
Q.Assume that the capital expenditures to replace and upgrade the production equipment are as given in the original exercise, but that the production and sales quantity is not known. For what production and sales quantity would TechGuide (i) upgrade the equipment or (ii) replace the equipment?
arrow_forward
Down below is the Chart where the New and Old Backhoes are displayed. Follow these Instructions:
A. Calculate the net present value of the old backhoes and the new backhoes.
B. Discuss the net present value of each, including what the calculations reveal about whether the company should purchase the new backhoes or continue using the old backhoes.
C. Calculate the payback period for keeping the old backhoes and purchasing the new backhoes. (Hint: For the old machines, evaluate the payback of an overhaul.)
D. Discuss the payback method and what the payback periods of the old backhoes and new backhoes reveal about whether the company should purchase new backhoes or continue using the old backhoes. Calculate the profitability index for keeping the old backhoes and purchasing new backhoes.
The following information is available to use in deciding whether to purchase the new backhoes or old backhoes. Using the 8% Present Value of an Annuity of 1.
Old Backhoes
New…
arrow_forward
Down below is the Chart where the New and Old Backhoes are displayed. Follow these Instructions:
A. Calculate the net present value of the old backhoes and the new backhoes.
B. Discuss the net present value of each, including what the calculations reveal about whether the company should purchase the new backhoes or continue using the old backhoes.
C. Calculate the payback period for keeping the old backhoes and purchasing the new backhoes. (Hint: For the old machines, evaluate the payback of an overhaul.)
D. Discuss the payback method and what the payback periods of the old backhoes and new backhoes reveal about whether the company should purchase new backhoes or continue using the old backhoes. Calculate the profitability index for keeping the old backhoes and purchasing new backhoes.
The following information is available to use in deciding whether to purchase the new backhoes or old backhoes. Using the 8% Present Value of an Annuity of 1.
Old Backhoes
New…
arrow_forward
Down below is the Chart where the New and Old Backhoes are displayed. Follow these Instructions:
A. Calculate the net present value of the old backhoes and the new backhoes.
B. Discuss the net present value of each, including what the calculations reveal about whether the company should purchase the new backhoes or continue using the old backhoes.
C. Calculate the payback period for keeping the old backhoes and purchasing the new backhoes. (Hint: For the old machines, evaluate the payback of an overhaul.)
D. Discuss the payback method and what the payback periods of the old backhoes and new backhoes reveal about whether the company should purchase new backhoes or continue using the old backhoes. Calculate the profitability index for keeping the old backhoes and purchasing new backhoes.
The following information is available to use in deciding whether to purchase the new backhoes or old backhoes. Using the 8% Present Value of an Annuity of 1.
Old Backhoes
New…
arrow_forward
Down below is the Chart where the New and Old Backhoes are displayed. Follow these Instructions:
A. Calculate the net present value of the old backhoes and the new backhoes.
B. Discuss the net present value of each, including what the calculations reveal about whether the company should purchase the new backhoes or continue using the old backhoes.
C. Calculate the payback period for keeping the old backhoes and purchasing the new backhoes. (Hint: For the old machines, evaluate the payback of an overhaul.)
D. Discuss the payback method and what the payback periods of the old backhoes and new backhoes reveal about whether the company should purchase new backhoes or continue using the old backhoes. Calculate the profitability index for keeping the old backhoes and purchasing new backhoes.
The following information is available to use in deciding whether to purchase the new backhoes or old backhoes. Using the 8% Present Value of an Annuity of 1.
Old Backhoes
New…
arrow_forward
The Aubey Coffee Company is evaluating the within-plant distribution system for its new roasting, grinding, and packing plant. The two alternatives are (1) a conveyor system with a high initial cost but low annual operating costs and (2) several forklift trucks, which cost less but have considerably higher operating costs. The decision to construct the plant has already been made, and the choice here will have no effect on the overall revenues of the project. The cost of capital for the plant is 7%, and the projects' expected net costs are listed in the following table:
Expected Net Cost
Year
Conveyor
Forklift
0
-$500,000
-$200,000
1
-120,000
-160,000
2
-120,000
-160,000
3
-120,000
-160,000
4
-120,000
-160,000
5
-20,000
-160,000
What is the IRR of each alternative?
The IRR of alternative 1 is -Select-undefined 5% 7% 9% Item 1 .
The IRR of…
arrow_forward
The Aubey Coffee Company is evaluating the within-plant distribution system for its new roasting, grinding, and packing plant. The two alternatives are (1) a conveyor system with a high initial cost but low annual operating costs and (2) several forklift trucks, which cost less but have considerably
higher operating costs. The decision to construct the plant has already been made, and the choice here will have no effect on the overall revenues of the project. The cost of capital for the plant is 12%, and the projects' expected net costs are listed in the following table:
a. What is the IRR of each alternative?
The IRR of alternative 1 is -Select-
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
-Select-
Expected Net Cost
Forklift
-$200,000
-160,000
-160,000
-160,000
-160,000
-160,000
Conveyor
-$500,000
-120,000
-120,000
-120,000
-120,000
-20,000
The IRR of alternative 2 is-Select-
b. What is the present value of costs of each alternative? Do not round Intermediate calculations. Round your answers to the nearest…
arrow_forward
The Aubey Coffee Company is evaluating the within-plant distribution system for its new roasting, grinding, and packing plant. The two alternatives are (1) a conveyor system with a high initial cost but low annual operating costs and (2) several forklift trucks, which cost less but have considerably higher
operating costs. The decision to construct the plant has already been made, and the choice here will have no effect on the overall revenues of the project. The cost of capital for the plant is 6%, and the projects' expected net costs are listed in the following table:
a. What is the IRR of each alternative?
The IRR of alternative 1 is -Select-
Alternative 2: $
Which method should be chosen?
The IRR of alternative 2 is -Select-
b. What is the present value of costs of each alternative? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to the nearest dollar. Use a minus sign to enter negative values, if any.
Alternative 1: $
-Select-
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
should be chosen.
Expected…
arrow_forward
Due to increased product demand, the Jax Company has insufficient floor space in its current production facility. Three alternative solutions have been identified: (A1) do nothing, (A2) rearrange an area of the existing floor space, or (A3) build an addition to the present plant. Analysis is conducted assuming a five-year planning horizon and an MARR of 30%. There is some uncertainty as to whether Jax will face competition for the new business. If alternative A1 is pursued, the estimated Present Worth will be $0. If alternative A2 is chosen, the Present Worth realized will depend on whether competition arises. Under A2, there is a 60% chance of competition occurring. The estimated PW under A2 will be $50,000 if competition arises; $30,000 if there is no competition. Under A3, there is a 20% chance of competition. The estimated PW under A3 will be -$100,000 if competition arises; $90,000 if there is no competition. (a) Based on expected PW, what course should Jax follow? (b)…
arrow_forward
1.
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:9780134897264
Author:KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...
Finance
ISBN:9781337395250
Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i...
Finance
ISBN:9780077861759
Author:Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Related Questions
- 3. Analysis of a replacement project At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company. Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following: • The new equipment will have a cost of $1,800,000, and it will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over a period of six years (years 1–6). • The old machine is also being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year). • The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000. • Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net working capital (NOWC) of $50,000…arrow_forward3. Analysis of a replacement project At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company. Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following: • The new equipment will have a cost of $9,000,000, and it will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over a period of six years (years 1–6). • The old machine is also being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year). • The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000. • Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net working capital (NOWC) of $50,000 that…arrow_forwardAll parts are under one question and therefore can be answered in full per your policy. 4. Analysis of a replacement project At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company. Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following: • The new equipment will have a cost of $600,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0. • The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year). • The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at…arrow_forward
- At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company. Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following: • The new equipment will have a cost of $1,800,000, and it will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over a period of six years (years 1–6). • The old machine is also being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year). • The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000. • Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of $50,000 that will be recovered at the end…arrow_forwardShow excel calculations.arrow_forwardMetal Recycling and Salvage receives the opportunity to salvage scrap metal and other materials from an old industrial site. The current owners of the site will sign over the site to Enviro at no cost. Enviro intends to extract scrap metal at the site for 24 months and then will clean up the site, return the land to useable condition, and sell it to a developer. Projected costs associated with the project follow: Read the requirements2. Requirement 1. Assuming that Enviro expects to salvage 70,000tons of metal from the site, what is the total project life cycle cost? Total Life-Cycle Costs Variable costs: Metal extraction and processing Fixed costs: Metal extraction and processing Rent on temporary buildings Administration Clean-up Land restoration Selling land Total life-cycle cost Requirement 2. Suppose Enviro can sell the metal for $110 per ton and wants to earn a…arrow_forward
- Please answer all questionsarrow_forwardAt times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:• The new equipment will have a cost of $1,200,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0.• The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).• The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000.• Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of $30,000 that will be…arrow_forwardAll equipment costs will continue to be depreciated on a straight-line basis. For simplicity, ignore income taxes and the time value of money. Q. Now suppose the one-time equipment cost to replace the production equipment is somewhat negotiable. All other data are as given previously. What is the maximum one-time equipment cost that TechGuide would be willing to pay to replace rather than upgrade the old equipment?arrow_forward
- A rental car company bought a new fleet of midsize cars and sold off its old midsize cars because they had too many miles on them. Which type of project would this be considered? An expansion project A replacement project What are sunk costs? Acme Manufacturing owns a warehouse that it is not currently using. It could sell the warehouse for $300,000 or use he warehouse in a new project. Should Acme Manufacturing include the value of the warehouse as part of the initial nvestment in the new project or treat the value of the warehouse as a sunk cost? Yes, include the value of the warehouse as part of the initial investment in the new project No, treat the value of the warehouse as a sunk cost The role of externalities A large soft-drink company currently produces regular cola and diet cola. It is considering introducing a new soft drink that tastes like regular cola but has zero calories like the diet cola. The new zero-calorie drink that tastes like egular cola is most likely to produce…arrow_forwardAt times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company. Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following: • The new equipment will have a cost of $2,400,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0. • The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year). • The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000. • Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of…arrow_forwardAt times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company. Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following: • The new equipment will have a cost of $2,400,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0. • The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year). • The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000. • Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Essentials Of InvestmentsFinanceISBN:9781260013924Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.Publisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
- Foundations Of FinanceFinanceISBN:9780134897264Author:KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. WilliamPublisher:Pearson,Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...FinanceISBN:9781337395250Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. HoustonPublisher:Cengage LearningCorporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i...FinanceISBN:9780077861759Author:Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:9780134897264
Author:KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...
Finance
ISBN:9781337395250
Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i...
Finance
ISBN:9780077861759
Author:Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education