Website Review--
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Grand Canyon University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
ENG-101
Subject
English
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by 5Deeja
1
Website Review: CHADD Website
Grand Canyon University
Professor Feldbush
ENG-105
2
Website Review: CHADD Website
There exist many websites dedicated to offering information about ADHD. One of these
websites is CHADD. The CHADD Foundation is a well-known organization that supports people
with ADHD. Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. National
Resource Center, a program that provides evidence-based ADHD information, powers the
organization's website. CHADD covers a range of subtopics related to ADHD, such as diagnosis,
treatment, professionals who can treat the condition, and insurance benefits. With such a massive
responsibility in the ADHD community, a website like CHADD should be reliable. The website
embodies integrity and reliability by complying with objectivity, authority, and accuracy criteria.
Objectivity
A health website's objectivity implies that it is not biased. CHADD is not biased about
the topic but focuses on relaying precise information. Even though the site aims to educate
visitors about ADHD, it maintains a neutral stance by sticking to the facts. Advertising policies
are crucial in determining whether a source is biased (Ayani et al., 2020). If a source runs ads on
its website, there should be labels that identify and separate ads from health information (Ayani
et al., 2020). Objectivity is also tied to the purpose of the specific source. CHADD does not
appear to have ulterior motives but focuses on ADHD-related information. Since the CHADD
website has no ads, one can assume its information does not lean on one side. The presence of
ads would imply that the website might exaggerate specific facts to make the website more
appealing to visitors. This manipulative tactic compromises the integrity and reliability of health
websites. Even though biased information is not necessarily wrong, health websites should strive
to be as neutral as possible and stick to the facts. Hence, the CHADD website is relatively
objective.
3
Accuracy
Accuracy is one of the most significant criteria for a health website. Studies have shown
that information quality and accuracy are ranked highest among site visitors (Pauer, 2016). The
accuracy of the information on the CHADD website is relatively high due to the inclusion of
various references and reading materials. Notably, the website has different worksheets on the
various ADHD subtopics. Additionally, the authors include suggested readings and references
that align with the information presented on the site. For instance, the website cites the American
Psychiatric Association when discussing the DSM-5 criteria for diagnosing ADHD. Referencing
allows readers to learn more about the health condition. It also gives visitors a sense of
confidence in the content of the website. At the same time, CHADD has a program dubbed The
National Research Center that provides evidence-based information on ADHD. With such a
powerful resource backing CHADD, it is safe to say that information on the website is right.
Furthermore, some scholars assert that one of the elements of information accuracy is the
availability of original data sources. Hence, the National Research Center acts as CHADD's
original source of information.
Authority
The authority of a source involves several elements. Some things that establish authority
are the author, the source, the sponsors, funding sources, and transparency (Ayani et al., 2020).
The site's domain can also help determine its credibility. The domain for CHADD is. org, which
raises the site's credibility. Websites with this domain are popular for their reliable information.
CHADD has also established itself as a transparent source because it indicates where it collects
its information. For instance, the website discusses the National Resource Center and its role in
providing evidence-based information. The National Resource Center works with ADHD
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
experts, adding to the website's authority. Even though the website does not list the name of the
authors of its articles, one can assume that the National Resource Center is the primary source of
these details. The website also includes sponsors of the website and the National Resource
Center. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Center on Birth
Defects and Developmental Disabilities (NCBDDD) collaborate to fund the activities of the
National Resource Center. At the same time, CHADD is transparent because it does not refer
visitors to specific professionals. The website lists clinicians and allows patients to determine the
best fit. This form of transparency makes the CHADD website reliable because readers can
determine if any conflicts of interest are associated with the sponsors.
Conclusion
The CHADD website is reliable because it aligns with three of the most significant
evaluation criteria: objectivity, accuracy, and authority. This site offers precise information by
including references and suggested further readings for visitors. In addition to that, this source
has authority due to its credible program that researches ADHD. It is also objective because it
does not seem to push its opinions but focuses on facts. The National Research Center plays a
crucial role in ensuring the credibility of CHADD. Overall, CHADD is a credible site that can
benefit people with ADHD and their families.
5
References
The
National Resource Center on ADHD (NRC)
, a program of CHADD
https://chadd.org/about/about-nrc/
Ayani, S., Sadoughi, F., Jabari, R., Moulaei, K., & Ashrafi-Rizi, H. (2020). Evaluation criteria
for health websites: Critical review.
Frontiers in Health Informatics
,
9
(1),
44. https://doi.org/10.30699/fhi.v9i1.235
Pauer, F., Göbel, J., Storf, H., Litzkendorf, S., Babac, A., Frank, M., Lührs, V., Schauer, F.,
Schmidtke, J., Biehl, L., Wagner, T. O., Ückert, F., Graf von der Schulenburg, J., &
Hartz, T. (2016). Adopting quality criteria for websites providing medical information
about rare diseases.
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
,
5
(3),
e24. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.5822