Dissertation Proposal
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Trident University International *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
4304
Subject
English
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
10
Uploaded by lavaniyaaditya07
University of Central Lancashire
School of Engineering
Division of Fire Safety Engineering
FV3900 Fire Science Dissertation Proposal Form
FV3500 Fire Studies Dissertation Proposal Form
Read: Breach, M (2009) Dissertation Writing for Engineers & Scientists, Pearson, Prentice Hall,
ISBN 978-1-4058-7278-2
STUDENT'S NAME
: STUDENT'S REGISTRATION NUMBER:
COURSE:
SUBMISSION DATE: You must
complete all three parts
to this form:
Part 1: The Proposal (not to exceed 2,000 words, excluding references)
Part 2: Ethics Checklist
Part 3: Risk Assessment (if carrying out experiments, fieldwork, travel or lone working)
YOU MUST OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR YOUR PROPOSAL, ETHICS
AND RISK ASSESSMENT BEFORE CARRYING OUT ANY DATA
COLLECTION ASSOCIATED WITH YOUR DISSERATION. A
THESIS SUBMITTED WITHOUT FORMAL APPROVAL WILL NOT
BE ASSESSED. Part 1: The Proposal
1.
Proposed Dissertation Title
Assessing the Environmental Impact of Electric Vehicle Fires and Firefighting
Measures
2.
Research Rationale
With the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the introduction of
electric vehicles (EVs) heralds a new age in transportation. EVs' high-voltage
lithium-ion batteries, however, make them particularly vulnerable to fire. Since
the combustion products and firefighting techniques may introduce new
environmental contaminants, it is essential to comprehend how EV fires affect
the environment.
3.
Aim(s) and Objectives
T
O
EVALUATE
THE
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT
OF
EV FIRES
AND
THE
EFFICACY
AND
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPLICATIONS
OF
CURRENT
FIREFIGHTING
MEASURES
.
O
BJECTIVES
:
1. T
O
CHARACTERIZE
THE
EMISSIONS
AND
POLLUTANTS
RESULTING
FROM
EV FIRES
.
2. T
O
ASSESS
THE
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT
OF
SUBSTANCES
USED
IN
EV FIRE
SUPPRESSION
.
3. T
O
IDENTIFY
AND
EVALUATE
THE
EFFECTIVENESS
OF
CURRENT
FIREFIGHTING
PROTOCOLS
FOR
EV FIRES
.
4. T
O
PROPOSE
GUIDELINES
FOR
ENVIRONMENTALLY
RESPONSIBLE
EV FIRE
MANAGEMENT
.
4.
A Brief Literature Review Literature Review: Environmental Impact of Electric Vehicle Fires and
Firefighting Measures
Due in large part to the high voltage lithium-ion batteries they use, the
widespread use of electric vehicles (EVs) as a sustainable replacement for
combustion engine cars has created significant difficulties for emergency
response and safety. Comprehensive research is necessary to address the
growing concern about the possible environmental implications of electric vehicle
fires, including the effects of combustion products and firefighting techniques.
EV Safety and Battery Risks
Though they represent a step toward more environmentally friendly
transportation, electric vehicles (EVs) also raise new safety issues, mainly
because of the lithium-ion batteries they run on. These energy storage devices'
inherent chemical dangers are the focus of current study. Thermal runaway, a
process where elevated battery cell temperature may cause an exothermic
reaction that raises temperature even more and may end in a self-sustaining fire,
is one of the major safety issues that has been found. Wu et al. (2022) have
investigated these risks and shown how these kinds of incidents might release a
mixture of dangerous substances. The complex makeup of these emissions
means that some of their components are recognized to be hazardous to human
health, while the wider environmental effects of others are still little understood.
The extent of these risks is also influenced by the high energy density of lithium-
ion batteries, which is essential to their broad adoption since it gives EVs a
longer range. In the case of a breakdown, a battery's capacity to discharge
energy will increase with density, potentially resulting in more intense and
difficult-to-control flames. By controlling the battery's surroundings and keeping
an eye on cell conditions, battery management systems (BMS) are designed to
reduce these dangers. BMS are complex and usually successful, but they are not
infallible (Huang et al., 2021).
This corpus of work does not go into a thorough analysis of the environmental
effects that arise from fires of this kind; rather, it informs stakeholders about the
first hazards connected to the EV revolution. These findings indicate a research
vacuum that has to be addressed in order to properly understand the
environmental effects of battery fires in electric cars, even while they provide a
basis for comprehending the immediate safety issues. Comprehensive studies of
the long-term environmental impacts of the chemical emissions from electric
vehicle battery fires are desperately needed, according to the literature.
Combustion Products of EV Fires
The toxicological concerns related to the combustion byproducts of electric
vehicle (EV) battery fires have come to light in recent studies into the aftermath
of these incidents. Research spearheaded by Premnath et al. (2022) has shed
light on the variety of gaseous emissions and particulates released during such
thermal incidents. Notably, these emissions are characterized by the presence of
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
heavy metals and a spectrum of other hazardous compounds. The distinction
between the combustion output of EVs and conventional internal combustion
engine vehicles is stark, with EV fires producing a unique set of pollutants that
bear a different profile of environmental toxicity (Petrauskienė et al., 2020).
Despite this growing body of evidence, there remains a paucity of research on
the enduring environmental repercussions of these emissions. The scarcity of
longitudinal studies tracking the ecological footprint of EV fire incidents suggests
a pronounced gap in current scientific literature. This gap underscores the need
for extended research endeavours to thoroughly assess the long-term
environmental outcomes following EV battery combustion events. Understanding
the complete spectrum of environmental impacts from these fires is critical, not
only for public health and safety but also for the formulation of robust EV fire
management strategies.
Environmental Impact Assessment
The methodology for gauging the environmental impact of electric vehicle (EV)
battery fires is still developing. Existing assessment frameworks, originally
designed for chemical spills and industrial accidents, fall short when confronted
with the specialized circumstances of EV fires. The emissions from EV fires
possess a unique composition that existing protocols do not fully encompass.
Moreover, the conditions under which EV fires occur can vary widely, from urban
settings to remote locations, each with distinct environmental considerations.
Hannan et al. (2021) point out that the current models for environmental impact
assessments need significant refinement to adequately capture the range of
pollutants released during EV battery fires. Tailoring these models to the specific
context of EV fires is essential, as is considering the different environments
affected by such incidents. This adjustment will guarantee a more accurate
comprehension of the ecological effects of EV fires, enabling the creation of more
potent mitigation and environmental protection plans.
Firefighting Protocols for EV Fires
The methods used to put out EV fires have changed as our knowledge of the
dangers has grown. Balcombe and Morag (2023) emphasized the necessity for
specialist training and equipment in light of the shortcomings of conventional
firefighting procedures when used to electric vehicle (EV) fires. The possibility of
re-ignition, the need for large volumes of water, and the difficulty of reaching the
battery compartment are some of the special difficulties. According to case
studies, inadequate methods may have a substantial negative influence on the
environment in addition to making it more difficult to contain the fire (Sun et al.,
2020).
Environmental Impact of Firefighting Measures
Interventions in firefighting related to electric vehicle (EV) fires have
consequences that go beyond just putting out the flames right away. The
deployment of chemical suppressants and the substantial water quantities
typically employed can inadvertently introduce new environmental hazards. Such
measures often result in runoff that carries potentially toxic chemicals into
surrounding soil and water systems, raising concerns about the broader
ecological footprint of firefighting efforts. The compounds in these firefighting
agents, while effective in dousing the flames, may themselves be detrimental to
environmental health, potentially affecting ecosystems and human populations
alike. However, the research exploring the enduring effects of these substances
post-firefighting is insufficient. Ponomarenko et al. (2019) have highlighted this
oversight, indicating a clear gap in the understanding of the long-term
environmental consequences of firefighting chemicals used on EV fires. It
emphasizes how important it is to do focused research on the consequences of
these firefighting techniques in order to make sure that extinguishing electric
vehicle fires in an ecologically sound and efficient manner.
Gaps in the Literature
A review of the literature indicates a major deficiency in comprehensive,
interdisciplinary research evaluating the total environmental effect of electric
vehicle fires and firefighting tactics. To provide a comprehensive knowledge of
the effects of EV fires, research integrating the domains of fire chemistry,
environmental toxicity, and emergency response is required. Furthermore,
recommendations for ecologically friendly firefighting techniques tailored to
electric vehicle mishaps are lacking, which is crucial for reducing the
environmental impact of these kinds of occurrences (Mellert et al., 2020).
Conclusion
The literature study emphasizes how difficult and urgent it is to comprehend how
EV fires affect the environment. Despite notable advancements in the
identification of the chemical hazards linked to lithium-ion batteries and the
toxicological characteristics of their combustion products, a large research gap
still exists regarding the evaluation of the environmental implications in a
comprehensive way. Moreover, the development and evaluation of specialized
firefighting protocols for EV fires are critical for mitigating these impacts.
Bridging the identified gaps through multidisciplinary research will be essential
for ensuring that the push towards sustainable transportation does not
inadvertently introduce new environmental hazards.
5.
Element of Originality
This research is original in its holistic approach to evaluating both the direct
emissions from EV fires and the subsequent environmental impact of fire
suppression methods. No existing studies provide a comprehensive
assessment that bridges the gap between fire chemistry and environmental
toxicology within the context of EV fire incidents.
6.
Proposed Programme of Work
Year 1:
Q1-Q2: Data collection on EV fire incidents and firefighting methods.
Q3-Q4: Analysis of soil and water samples from EV fire sites.
Year 2:
Q1-Q2: Laboratory simulation of EV fires and firefighting interventions.
Q3-Q4: Evaluation of environmental impact and development of guidelines.
Methods:
Qualitative analysis of firefighting protocols.
Quantitative chemical analysis of pollutants.
Statistical assessment of environmental data.
7.
Facilities, Equipment and Permissions / Authorisations
Facilities:
1.
Combustion Laboratory:
A facility equipped to simulate EV battery fires safely.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Estimated cost for lab space rental and usage: £15,000 per annum.
2.
Environmental Testing Laboratory:
Access to a lab capable of analysing soil and water samples for
chemical and toxicological content.
Estimated cost for lab space rental and usage: £20,000 per annum.
Equipment:
1.
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS):
For the analysis of organic compounds in fire emissions and soil/water
samples.
Estimated cost: £60,000 for purchase or £10,000 per annum for lease.
2.
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS):
For detecting and quantifying metals.
Estimated cost: £80,000 for purchase or £12,000 per annum for lease.
3.
Toxicity Testing Kits:
To evaluate the ecological and health risks of collected samples.
Estimated cost: £5,000 for a comprehensive set of tests.
4.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE):
For safety during sample collection and laboratory work.
Estimated cost: £2,000 for initial supply and replacements.
5.
GPS and GIS Technology:
For accurate site mapping and sample collection.
Estimated cost: £5,000 for high-quality devices and software licenses.
Permissions/Authorizations:
1.
Access to Fire Incident Sites:
Agreements with local fire departments and property owners to access
sites for sample collection.
Costs may vary, potentially including legal fees for agreements: estimated
at £3,000.
2.
Environmental Sampling Permissions:
Permissions from environmental protection agencies for the collection of
soil and water samples.
No direct cost is assumed, but administrative fees may apply: estimated at
£1,000.
3.
Data Sharing Agreements:
Arrangements with fire departments and environmental agencies for the
sharing of incident reports and environmental data.
Estimated cost for legal and administrative handling: £2,000.
Total Estimated Monetary Costs:
Facility Rental and Usage: £35,000 per annum.
Equipment Purchase or Lease: Up to £140,000 for purchase or £22,000 per
annum for lease.
Testing Kits and PPE: £7,000.
GPS/GIS Technology: £5,000.
Permissions and Legal Fees: £6,000.
Miscellaneous and Contingencies: £5,000.
Overall Total (for Purchasing Equipment): £198,000 + £35,000 (annual facility
rental) + miscellaneous costs.
Overall Total (for Leasing Equipment): £35,000 + £22,000 (annual equipment
lease) + annual costs for testing, technology, permissions, and miscellaneous
expenses.
8. References
Balcombe, E.B. and Morag, N., 2023. What Strategic Adaptation to
Technology Would Benefit Firefighters Responding to and Preparing for
Electric Vehicle Emergencies?.
Hannan, M.A., Al-Shetwi, A.Q., Begum, R.A., Ker, P.J., Rahman, S.A., Mansor,
M., Mia, M.S., Muttaqi, K.M. and Dong, Z.Y., 2021. Impact assessment of
battery energy storage systems towards achieving sustainable development
goals.
Journal of Energy Storage
,
42
, p.103040.
Huang, Y., Yona, A., Takahashi, H., Hemeida, A.M., Mandal, P., Mikhaylov, A.,
Senjyu, T. and Lotfy, M.E., 2021. Energy management system optimization of
drug store electric vehicles charging station operation.
Sustainability
,
13
(11),
p.6163.
Mellert, L.D., Welte, U., Tuchschmid, M., Held, M., Hermann, M., Kompatscher,
M., Tesson, M. and Nachef, L., 2020. Risk minimisation of electric vehicle fires
in underground traffic infrastructures.
Schweizer Verband der Strassen-und
Verkehrsfachleute (VSS)
.
Petrauskienė, K., Skvarnavičiūtė, M. and Dvarionienė, J., 2020. Comparative
environmental life cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles in
Lithuania.
Journal of Cleaner Production
,
246
, p.119042.
Ponomarenko, R., Loboichenko, V., Strelets, V., Gurbanova, M., Morozov, A.,
Kovalov, P., Shevchenko, R. and Kovalova, T., 2019. Review of the
environmental characteristics of fire extinguishing substances of different
composition used for fires extinguishing of various classes.
Premnath, V., Wang, Y., Wright, N., Khalek, I. and Uribe, S., 2022. Detailed
characterization of particle emissions from battery fires.
Aerosol Science and
Technology
,
56
(4), pp.337-354.
Sun, P., Bisschop, R., Niu, H. and Huang, X., 2020. A review of battery fires in
electric vehicles.
Fire technology
,
56
, pp.1361-1410.
Wu, W., Bo, Y., Li, D., Liang, Y., Zhang, J., Cao, M., Guo, R., Zhu, Z., Ci, L., Li,
M. and Zhang, J., 2022. Safe and stable lithium metal batteries enabled by an
amide-based electrolyte.
Nano-Micro Letters
,
14
(1), p.44.
Proposed Supervisor: I agree to supervise this project:
SIGNED DATE DECLARATION
I confirm that the particulars given in this form are correct. I understand that I must prepare my project in English. I declare that all the work done in connection with my
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
project will be my own.
SIGNED
DATE FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Date Received:
Further details required
YES/NO
Approved by Dissertation Committee YES/NO
Supervisor approved YES/NO
Student notified: Date:
Part 2: Ethics Checklist
Part 3: Risk Assessment (if carrying out experiments,
fieldwork, travel or lone working)