Lab2_ Voltage Regulators

pdf

School

Toronto Metropolitan University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

404

Subject

Electrical Engineering

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

14

Uploaded by CommodoreOryx4076

Report
Course Title: Electronic Circuits I Course Number: ELE 404 Semester/Year W2024 Instructor: Prof. Fei Yuan Assignment/ Lab Number: Lab 2 Assignment/Lab Title: Voltage Regulators Submission Date: Feb. 10, 2024 Due Date: Feb. 11, 2024 Student LAST Name Student FIRST Name Student Number Section Signature* El-Hage Ali 501167729 12 Pope Pope 501153591 12
Lab Report (Voltage Regulators) By: Justin Pope & Ali El-Hage Date of Preparation: February 01, 2024 Table of Contents 1. Introduction…………..…………..………… .... …………..…………..……R2 2. Objectives..…………..…………..…………..…………..…………..………R2 3. Circuit Under Test..…………..…………..…………..…………..…………R2 4. Experimental Results..…………..………..…………..…………..……...…R5 5. Conclusions and Remarks..………….………..…………..…………..……R6 6. Appendix: Pre-Lab and TA Copy of Results………………………………R9 Page R1
1. Introduction The Voltage Regulators Lab 2 report is presented below. The experiments were conducted on Wednesday, January 31, 2024. The pre-lab report and the TA copy of the experimental results are placed at the end of the report as an Appendix. 2. Objectives The objective of this lab was to examine the three simplest types of voltage regulators. The types of voltage regulators are resistive voltage divider, voltage regulator based on zener diodes, and a voltage regulator that capitalizes on the more-or-less constant and known state voltage drop of the diodes. From these investigations, we will then find the load regulation properties of three types of voltage regulators. 3. Circuit under Test Figure 1 shows the schematic for the circuit of the “load” constructed in the lab. The “load” consists of a 2N3904 Bipolar Junction Transistor (JBT) connected to a potentiometer and 3 resistors (100Ω, 560Ω, and 6.8kΩ). Figure 1. Circuit of the “load” for this lab. Figure 2 shows the first schematic of the circuit constructed; two resistors connected to an adjustable load. Figure 3 is the same circuit but with a 1N4735, 6.2-V Zener diode instead of R2. Figure 4 is also the same circuit, however, in replacement of the R2 resistor, nine 1N4148 diodes are in series. Page R2
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Figure 2. A resistive voltage divider supplying a load. Figure 3. A Zener-diode-based voltage regulator supplying a load. Page R3
Figure 4. A diode-based voltage regulator supplying a load. Figure 5 (a) and (b) shows a screenshot of the Multisim software environment, the same setup used for the circuits in the lab experimentation. (a) (b) Figure 5. (a) A resistive voltage divider supplying a load and (b) a Zener-diode-based voltage regulator. Page R4
4. Experimental Results In the lab, we measured the V o (Output Voltage) based on the V x (The node after the Emitter of the BJT Transistor) produced by the current load (i L ) that was needed to collect our data accurately. In order to collect the different current loads (i L ), we had to turn the potentiometer clockwise in order to reach the value of V x produced to match the current load needed. After measuring the output voltages at each current load, we then inserted the data found into Table E1 . The same procedures were taken for each of the following voltage regulators in order to find the respective V o (Output Voltages) based on the different current loads (i L ) to complete Tables E2 and E3 . Table E1. Output voltage as a function of load current in the circuit of Figure 2 . i L [mA] (v x [V]) 0 (0) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.2) 3 (0.3) 4 (0.4) 5 (0.5) 6 (0.6) 7 (0.7) 8 (0.8) v O [V] 6.055 5.835 5.488 5.151 4.807 4.455 4.112 3.779 3.425 Table E2. Output voltage as a function of load current in the circuit of Figure 3 . i L [mA] (v x [V]) 0 (0) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.2) 3 (0.3) 4 (0.4) 5 (0.5) 6 (0.6) 7 (0.7) 8 (0.8) v O [V] 6.043 6.043 6.035 6.03 6.024 6.018 6.012 6.001 5.517 Table E3. Output voltage as a function of load current in the circuit of Figure 4 . i L [mA] (v x [V]) 0 (0) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.2) 3 (0.3) 4 (0.4) 5 (0.5) 6 (0.6) 7 (0.7) 8 (0.8) v O [V] 6.32 6.28 6.197 6.110 6.004 5.881 5.717 6.024 5.525 Page R5
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
5. Conclusions and Remarks This section answers the questions raised in the lab manual. The questions have been repeated in italic bold font, for the ease of reference. C1. Based on the results of Step P1, and using the relationship ࠵?࠵? = ࠵?࠵? / ࠵?࠵? , calculate the (fictitious) load resistance that corresponds to each of the currents specified in Table P1, and complete Table C1. Based on Table C1, then, explain the relationship that ࠵?࠵? should have with the output resistance (i.e., the Thevenin resistance) of the voltage divider such that the deviation of the output voltage from the no-load output voltage is insignificant. Table C1. Equivalent load resistance for the voltage divider of Figure 5 (a) . i L [mA] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 v O [V] (Table P1) 6.19 5.84 5.50 5.15 4.80 4.46 4.11 3.76 3.42 R L [kΩ] 5.84 2.75 1.72 1.20 0.892 0.685 0.537 0.428 The relationship that R L must have with the output resistance of the voltage divider such that the deviation of the output voltage from the no-load output voltage is insignificant is that R L >> R th . When the load resistance is significantly larger than the Thevenin resistance, the load will then have a small impact on the voltage divider since less current is flowing through it. As a result, the output voltage will remain close to the no-load output voltage. C2. For the voltage divider of Figure 5 (a), compare the calculated output voltages (Table P1) and measured output voltages (Table E2), correspondingly, and calculate the percent error as ࠵?% = ࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵? ࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?−࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵? ࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵? ࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵? ࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵? × 100. Complete Table C2 and comment on the acceptability of and reasons for the errors. Table C2. Percent error between the calculated and measured output voltages of the voltage divider of Figure 5 (a). i L [mA] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 v O [V] (Table P1) 6.19 5.84 5.50 5.15 4.80 4.46 4.11 3.76 3.42 v O [V] (Table E1) 6.055 5.835 5.488 5.151 4.808 4.455 4.112 3.779 3.425 e % 2.23 0.09 0.22 0.02 0.17 0.11 0.05 0.5 0.15 Page R6
All of the data is nearly perfectly collected when comparing the theoretical values to the measured values, with all of the percentage errors being almost 0%. This proves our experimentations were extremely accurate. Like any experiment it is not possible to have exactly 0% error. Reasons for our small deviations are most likely due to the tolerances for the resistors used. C3. For the Zener-diode-based voltage regulator of Figure 5 (b), compare the calculated output voltages (Table P2) and measured output voltages (Table E2), correspondingly. Calculate the percent error and complete Table C3. Additionally, provide comments on the acceptability of and reasons for the errors. Table C3. Percent error between the calculated and measured output voltages of the voltage divider of Figure 5 (b) i L [mA] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 v O [V] (Table P2) 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.64 6.08 5.52 v O [V] (Table E2) 6.043 6.043 6.035 6.030 6.024 6.018 6.012 6.001 5.517 e % 2.60 2.60 2.74 2.74 2.92 3.02 10.46 1.32 0.05 Likewise, all of the data have low percentage errors. This proves our experimentations were accurately conducted. Like any experiment it is not possible to have exactly 0% error. Reasons for our small deviations are most likely due to the tolerances for the resistors used. Also, our calculations would be dependent on how precisely we got the corresponding current to flow through the circuit. We manually adjusted the current flow using the potentiometer, however, it is not possible to get precisely the aimed current flow when adjusting the load. Page R7
C4. Plot the ࠵?࠵? - ࠵?࠵? curves of Graph E1, Graph E2, and Graph E3 on one frame, labeled as Graph C4. Based on Graph C4, comment on the capability of each type of voltage regulator (i.e., voltage divider, diode-based, and Zener-diode-based) in maintaining its output voltage as the load current rises. Graph C4 . V o -i L curves of Table E2, Table E3, and Table E4 Voltage Divider voltage regulators divide the input voltage down to the desired output voltage as the current load increases. However, voltage dividers struggle to maintain a stable output voltage if current load is very high. This is the reason why in Graph C4 , the output voltage is not stable. Diode-based voltage regulators can provide a stable output voltage over a certain range of load current. The Diode-based voltage regulators can sometimes struggle to maintain a constant output voltage at a certain current load due to the diode's forward voltage drop becoming much less under high current loads. That's why in Graph C4 , we see the line is constant up until it reaches the 6mA mark, where it has a drop in output voltage and goes back up. Zener Diodes are the best voltage regulator out of the other two. Zener Diode voltage regulators use its voltage of the zener diode breakdown voltage in order to maintain a steady output voltage. Page R8
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
C5. Aside from their voltage regulation performance, compare the Zener-diode-based voltage regulator of Figure 3 with the diode-based voltage regulator of Figure 4. The Zener-based voltage regulator is a much better voltage regulator compared to the diode-based voltage regulator. This is due to the amount of diodes required for the diode-based voltage regulator needed to maintain a certain output voltage. The Diode-based voltage regulators can struggle to maintain a constant output voltage at a certain current load due to the diode's forward voltage drop becoming much less under high current loads. In summary, the Zener diode voltage regulator offers better voltage regulation compared to the other types of voltage regulators due to its capability to maintain a good voltage regulation over a range of load currents. . 6. Appendix: Pre-Lab and TA Copy of Results Page R9
Lab 2: Voltage Regulators By: Justin Pope Date of Preparation: January 25, 2024 P1: Simulation of the Circuit of Figure 1 using Multisim Figure 1. Multisim circuit schematic for a resistive voltage divider supplying a load ࠵?࠵?࠵? ࠵?࠵? ࠵? ࠵? 10−࠵? ࠵? 560 = ࠵? ࠵? 910 + ࠵? ࠵? ࠵? ࠵? = 130 21 1040 3 ࠵? ࠵? Table P1. Output voltage as a function of load current in the voltage divider of Figure 1. I L [mA] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 V O [V] 6.19 5.84 5.50 5.15 4.80 4.46 4.11 3.76 3.42
Lab 2: Voltage Regulators By: Justin Pope Date of Preparation: January 25, 2024 Graph P1. Output voltage versus load current in the resistive voltage divider of Figure 1. P2: Simulation of the Circuit of Figure 2 using Multisim Figure 2. Multisim circuit schematic for an output voltage as a function of load current in the Zener-diode-based voltage regulator
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Lab 2: Voltage Regulators By: Justin Pope Date of Preparation: January 25, 2024 ࠵?ℎ࠵?࠵? ࠵? ࠵? > 1࠵?࠵?, ࠵? ࠵? = 6. 2࠵? ࠵? ࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵? = 10−6.2 560 = 6. 7࠵?࠵? ࠵? ࠵? = 6. 7࠵?࠵? − ࠵? ࠵? ࠵?ℎ࠵?࠵? ࠵? ࠵? < 1࠵?࠵?, ࠵?ℎ࠵? ࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵? ࠵?࠵? ࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵? ࠵?࠵? ࠵?ℎ࠵? ࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵? ࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵?࠵? 10−࠵? ࠵? 560 = ࠵? ࠵? ࠵? ࠵? = 10 − 560࠵? ࠵? Table P2. Output voltage as a function of load current in the Zener-diode-based voltage regulator of Figure 1. I L [mA] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 V O [V] 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.64 6.08 5.52 Graph P2. Output voltage versus load current in the Zener-diode-based voltage of Figure 2.
Page R10