POD1003_Self_Assessment_2
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Lambton College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1003
Subject
Communications
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by ChiefHeronPerson1074
Self Reflection Activity #2
Key Information
Type: Individual
Weight: 7.5%
Delivery: D2L – Assignment folder
Due Date: Friday, November 24 by 11:59pm
Expectations
You are expected to complete this assignment individually. Please use full sentences and proper formatting in your written response. Ensure that you are using APA citations and reference methodology.
Respect for academic integrity is crucial to your success. Make sure you understand what constitutes acts of academic dishonesty as per your instructor.
Instructions
Based upon the material covered in the POD 1003: Foundations of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion course
to date, please reflect upon the questions answered below, and submit your written personal reflections
to the Self Reflection #2 drop box on D2L. This written activity is intended to be 400 to 700 words in length, and to help you as a student understand and apply the content of this course.
Based upon the Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility (IDEA) survey that was completed as an in-
class activity in Week 11, please answer the self reflection questions below. This assignment will be held as confidential and will not be disclosed to anyone other than the instructor of the course. There are no right or wrong answers, but the assignment is graded based upon the Self Reflection Activity Rubric, and the standards of Academic Integrity of Lambton College.
Questions to be answered within your Self Reflection Activity #2:
1.
Based on the content discussed in class to date, what is your conceptualization of completing IDEA Surveys in the workplace? What do you see as the benefits or drawbacks of using this type of survey in the workplace? (5 points)
2.
Based upon your own identities, privilege(s) and positions of power in relation to the issue(s) discussed in class, how did completing the IDEA survey make you feel? Did you understand the need for the demographic data that was requested? Did it make you uncomfortable? (5 points)
3.
How did the communication about the IDEA Survey, including the compelling reason(s) for the survey, the information relating to the research ethics, data security, anonymity of information, etc. make you feel about completing the survey? (5 points)
4.
Do you feel that you would be able to make a business case for an IDEA Survey in the workplace? (5 points)
Self Reflection Activity Rubric
Criteria
Meets All Expectations
Meets Most of the Expectations
Meets Some of the Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations
Criteria 1: Understanding and Application of Content
Content indicates an in-depth analysis and understanding of the purpose and process of IDEA surveys as well as the benefits and drawbacks involved. Supporting examples and evidence included.
(5 points)
Content is developed and
most analysis is complete, shows understanding of the purpose and process of IDEA surveys. Some analysis of benefits and drawbacks. May
lack sufficient examples.
(4 points)
Content demonstrates a basic understanding of the purpose and process of IDEA surveys, with limited analysis of benefits and drawbacks. May lack supporting examples or evidence. (3 points)
Content is underdeveloped and demonstrates minimal to no understanding of the purpose and process of IDEA surveys. Lacks supporting examples and evidence.
(2 points)
Criteria 2: Reflection and Self-Analysis
Content indicates a deep and thoughtful reflection on IDEA surveys impact on personal identities, privileges, and positions of power. Analysis of demographic data included. Addresses discomfort with depth and insight.
(5 points)
Content indicates a decent reflection on IDEA surveys impact on personal identities, privileges, and positions of power. Addresses the need for demographic data and analysis of discomfort with depth and insight.
(4 points) Content offers a basic reflection on the impact of completing the IDEA survey, with limited analysis of personal identities, privileges, and positions of power. May briefly addresses the need for demographic data. Addresses discomfort but lacks depth.
(3 points)
Content provides minimal or no reflection on the impact of the IDEA survey on personal identities, privileges, and positions of power. Lacks analysis of the need for demographic data and discomfort.
(2 points)
Criteria 3: Evaluation
of Communication
Content provides a comprehensive evaluation of the communication strategy, highlighting importance of research ethics, data security, and anonymity. Offers insightful
reflection on how the communication influenced the individual’s perception/ willingness to participate. (5 points)
Content provides a satisfactory evaluation of the
communication strategy, highlighting some aspects of effectiveness in providing information on research ethics, data security, and anonymity. Presents some reflection on how the communication influenced the individual's perception/ willingness to participate.
(4 points)
Content provides a basic evaluation of the communication strategy, with limited discussion on the effectiveness of the provided information on research ethics, data security, and anonymity. Offers basic reflection on how the communication influenced the
individual's perception/ willingness to participate.
(3 points)
Content provides minimal or no evaluation of the communication strategy. Lacks discussion on the effectiveness of the provided
information on research ethics, data security, and anonymity. Minimal or no reflection on how the communication influenced the individual's perception/ willingness to participate.
(2 points)
Criteria 4: Business Case Development
Content indicates an in-depth analysis and understanding of the purpose and process of Content is developed and
most analysis is complete, demonstrating an Content lacks some development and demonstrates a basic Content is underdeveloped and demonstrates minimal to no understanding of the
IDEA surveys in the workplace as well as the benefits and drawbacks involved. Content is supported by insightful examples and evidence.
(5 points)
understanding of the purpose and process of IEDA surveys. Presents some analysis of the benefits and drawbacks but may lack depth or sufficient examples.
(4 points)
understanding of the purpose and process of IDEA surveys, with limited analysis of benefits and drawbacks. May lack supporting examples or evidence. (3 points)
purpose and process of IEDA surveys, with no analysis of benefits or drawbacks. Lacks supporting examples and evidence.
(2 points)
Total
16 or more points
12 or more points
8 or more points
0 or more points
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help