Assessment Traits

docx

School

Grand Canyon University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

108

Subject

Communications

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by ChiefGazelleMaster833

Assessment Traits Requires Lopeswrite Assessment Description Knowing what your strengths and weaknesses are will help you understand steps you should take to improve as a student. GCU would like to assist you in improving your study habits and notetaking. Evaluate your study skills and habits by completing the “Academic Skills Worksheet.” After completing the self-evaluation, reflect on your evaluation. This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Attachments UNV-108_T2-AcademicSkillsAssessment.docx SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu Academic Skills Assessment and Reflection - Rubric LISTGRID PRINT TO PDF Rubric Criteria Collapse All Rubric Criteria Collapse All Part 1: Self-Evaluation 3 points Criteria Description Part 1: Self-Evaluation 5. Target 3 points Self-evaluation is complete. Responses to all of the questions are highlighted clearly. 4. Acceptable 2.55 points Self-evaluation is complete. 3. Approaching 2.25 points Some responses on the self-evaluation are unclear. 2. Insufficient 1.95 points Self-evaluation is incomplete. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. Part 2: Reflection (Learning Style) 15 points Criteria Description Part 2: Reflection (Learning Style) 5. Target 15 points

Learning style is thoroughly specified and explained, and example creatively demonstrate the learning style. 4. Acceptable 12.75 points Learning style is properly specified and explained, and example logically demonstrate the learning style. 3. Approaching 11.25 points Learning style is specified and example basically demonstrate the learning style. 2. Insufficient 9.75 points Learning style is vaguely specified; example that demonstrate the learning style are underdeveloped. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. Part 2: Reflection (Intelligence Type) 15 points Criteria Description Part 2: Reflection (Intelligence Type) 5. Target 15 points Intelligence type is specifically identified. Explanation of why this intelligence type applies to the student is proficient and examples are insightful. 4. Acceptable 12.75 points Intelligence type is clearly identified. Explanation of why this intelligence type applies to the student is reasonable and examples are relevant. 3. Approaching 11.25 points Intelligence type is identified. Explanation of why this intelligence type applies to the student is adequate and examples are elementary. 2. Insufficient 9.75 points Intelligence type is vaguely identified. Why this intelligence type applies to the student is incomprehensible. Examples are irrelevant. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Part 2: Reflection (Correlation between Learning Style and Intelligence Type) 15 points Criteria Description Part 2: Reflection (Correlation between Learning Style and Intelligence Type) 5. Target 15 points How student success is affected by knowing learning style and intelligence type is extensively explained. 4. Acceptable 12.75 points How student success is affected by knowing learning style and intelligence type is soundly explained. 3. Approaching 11.25 points How student success is affected by knowing learning style and intelligence type is simply explained. 2. Insufficient 9.75 points How student success is affected by knowing learning style and intelligence type is minimally explained. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. Organization 6 points Criteria Description Organization 5. Target 6 points The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. 4. Acceptable 5.1 points The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. 3. Approaching 4.5 points

The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. 2. Insufficient 3.9 points An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 6 points Criteria Description Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5. Target 6 points Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. 4. Acceptable 5.1 points Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. 3. Approaching 4.5 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader; or inconsistent language or word choice is present; or sentence structure could be more varied. 2. Insufficient 3.9 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. 1. No Submission 0 points Not addressed. Total 60 points

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Assessment Traits

Related Documents