HRMD 665---Laughlin

docx

School

Community College of Baltimore County *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

665

Subject

Business

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by Liamsys

Report
HRMD 665 DISCUSSION WEEK 10 We've examined several exciting and thought-provoking human relations themes this semester. Group problem-solving and decision-making resonates with me the most. I now understand how teams work and accomplish objectives because of this philosophy. Team problem-solving and decision-making entail finding, assessing, and choosing the optimal solution or choice. Any team needs this procedure to evaluate all viewpoints and ideas for a better informed and thorough choice. This thought resonated with me since team members contribute varied viewpoints. Laughlin (2010) states that diverse teams are more likely to find innovative solutions and solve challenges than lone individuals. This approach has taught me the significance of team diversity and how each member's talents and experiences contribute to decision-making. The readings have also shown collective problem-solving and decision- making risks. Turner and Pratkanis (n.d.) warn against groupthink, whereas the Saylor Foundation (n.d.) shows how commitment escalation may lead to bad decisions. These books have made me more aware of team decision- making issues. An open and critical conversation might be hindered by conformity pressure or fear of being ridiculed for disagreeing. Understanding these difficulties has helped me design solutions like fostering healthy discussion and speaking up. Groupthink has also been important to me since it illuminates team leadership. Turner and Pratkanis (n.d.) say leadership styles that encourage conformity and suppress disagreement might cause groupthink. This has taught me the value of a leader who promotes diversity and inquiry. A leader who welcomes criticism and various perspectives may foster critical thinking and improved decision-making. I believe every team should understand groupthink and its causes. Groupthink may lead to wrong judgments, lost opportunities, and failure. Teams may prevent groupthink and make better choices by recognizing the warning signals and supporting open communication and varied opinions.
Harvey (1988)'s Abilene paradox also enlightened me. It shows how people may agree to a bad idea, causing inefficiency and dissatisfaction. This thought helped me understand how vital team communication and honesty are. Openly sharing ideas and concerns helps a team avoid spending time and resources on choices that don't align with their aims. Group problem-solving and decision-making have been my favorite concepts this semester. It has taught me about team dynamics, diversity, leadership, and open communication in decision-making. These ideas are essential for teams to succeed and prevent mistakes. Every team should know these notions to improve decision-making and success. Reference Laughlin, P.R. (2010). Group problem solving and decision making. In J. M. Levine & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations [electronic version]. Retrieved from http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/processes/n113.xml Harvey, J. (1988, Summer). The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement. Organizational Dynamics, 17(1), 17–43. Retrieved from http://www.rmastudies.org.nz/documents/AbileneParadoxJerryHarvey.pdf
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help